Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Mean-zero pressure recovery from a solenoidal residual

Statement

Assume Countable Choice and use the Stokes spaces V=H01(D;Rd) and Q=L02(D) of Stokes velocity and pressure spaces and weak forms: D⊂Rd is nonempty, bounded, connected and Lipschitz, with d∈{2,3}. Fix 0<T<∞. If 1<s<∞ and R∈Ls(0,T;V∗) satisfies R(t)(v)=0 for every v∈Vσ=ker⁡(div⁡:V→L02(D)) outside one common null set, then there is a unique p∈Ls(0,T;L02(D)) such that R(t)(v)=b(v,p(t)) for every v∈V almost everywhere. Moreover, ∥p∥LsL2≤Cdiv(D)∥R∥LsV∗.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, V=H01(D)d, Q=L02(D), a bounded divergence right inverse BD:Q→V, and a Bochner functional R∈Ls(0,T;V∗) annihilating Vσ.

[F1]

Every q∈Q has BDq∈V with div⁡BDq=q and ∥BDq∥V≤Cdiv(D)∥q∥2. (Divergence right inverse on bounded connected Lipschitz domains)

[F2]

Every v∈V has div⁡v∈Q. (Zero mean of the divergence of a zero-boundary field)

[F3]

The pressure gauge is Q=L02(D) and b(v,p)=−∫Dp div⁡v. (Stokes velocity and pressure spaces and weak forms)

[F4]

Every bounded linear functional on the real Hilbert space Q is represented by a unique L2 inner-product vector. (Riesz representation for Hilbert spaces)

[A1]

Countable Choice is assumed by the divergence-lift and Hilbert Riesz suppliers, including the Bochner measurability of the represented pressure. (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), Divergence right inverse on bounded connected Lipschitz domains, Riesz representation for Hilbert spaces)

Proof

1.1A1F1F4givenconstruct

For almost every t, define a bounded linear functional ℓt on Q by ℓt(q)=R(t)(BDq). From [F1], ∥ℓt∥Q∗≤Cdiv(D)∥R(t)∥V∗. By [F4], there is a unique p^(t)∈Q such that (p^(t),q)L2=ℓt(q) for all q∈Q. The map R(t)↦p^(t) is bounded linear, so p^∈Ls(0,T;Q) with the corresponding norm bound.

2.1F1F2F3step 1.1algebra

For v∈V, put q=div⁡v∈Q by [F2]. Then v−BDq∈Vσ, so the annihilator assumption gives R(t)(v)=R(t)(BDq)=(p^(t),q)L2=−b(v,p^(t)). Set p=−p^ to obtain R(t)(v)=b(v,p(t)).

3.1F1F3step 2.1algebra∎

If p1,p2∈Q both represent the same residual, then b(BDq,p1−p2)=0 for every q∈Q. By [F1], div⁡BDq=q, so (p1−p2,q)L2=0 for all q∈Q; choosing q=p1−p2 proves equality. This also confirms uniqueness in the zero-mean gauge.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources