How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Measurable coefficients with a Holder-regular weak solution
Example
Example. On the annulus let Then is measurable, bounded and uniformly elliptic on with and , and is continuous across but has a discontinuous radial derivative there (it drops from to ), so . The a.e. flux has the smooth representative on , which is divergence-free, and it realizes as a weak solution of in the local sense of Local weak solutions of a divergence-form operator. The coefficient is not continuous, yet is Holder continuous of every exponent , in accordance with De Giorgi-Nash interior Holder regularity for divergence-form equations; the example also shows that this conclusion cannot be improved to .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice; the annulus ; the radial coefficient equal to for and for ; and the radial function defined by the two displayed formulas.
Uniform ellipticity and boundedness: is measurable, on , and the matrix satisfies for all , so the ellipticity constant is and the coefficient bound is in the convention of Uniformly elliptic divergence-form operators and their sesquilinear forms (The notation and the reserved zero-boundary symbol).
Regularity of the pieces: on each of the open annuli and the function is smooth and radial, with and on , on ; the glued function lies in with these a.e. gradients. Indeed , where for , for , and for . This is a globally -Lipschitz scalar function. Since is smooth on with gradient and belongs to , the Sobolev chain rule establishes the asserted membership and gradient (Chain rule for globally Lipschitz scalar maps of Sobolev functions) (Weak derivative of a locally integrable function, Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases).
Continuity and differentiability across the interface: at the first formula gives and the second gives , so is continuous there; the radial derivative is from the inner side and from the outer side, so the derivative is discontinuous and , while is bounded away from the origin in polar coordinates, so is Lipschitz and hence Holder of every exponent (Local Hölder and scaled C-two-alpha norms on balls).
The flux: a.e. on , because for both branches of and of ; the field is smooth on , there, and (Local weak solutions of a divergence-form operator).
Local weak solutions: is a local weak solution of when for every ; the De Giorgi-Nash theorem gives, for such a solution with measurable uniformly elliptic coefficients, a Holder representative with exponent depending only on (Local weak solutions of a divergence-form operator, De Giorgi-Nash interior Holder regularity for divergence-form equations).
Verification
The coefficient satisfies the structural hypotheses. By [F1] the coefficient is measurable, bounded by and bounded below by , so the associated divergence-form operator with is uniformly elliptic with and ; in particular the hypotheses of the De Giorgi-Nash theorem are satisfied although is not continuous.
The flux is divergence-free and realizes the weak equation. By [F2]-[F4], a.e. on . This smooth field has divergence . For , integration by parts therefore gives . Approximate an arbitrary by these compact smooth tests; Cauchy--Schwarz passes the integral because . Thus the identity holds for every test; hence is a local weak solution of in the sense of [F5].
The conclusions about regularity. Since is Lipschitz on by [F3], it is Holder continuous of every exponent , consistently with the De Giorgi-Nash conclusion but with no regularity: the radial derivative jumps from to at , so ; the example therefore exhibits a weak solution whose regularity comes from the structure constants alone, while the measurable coefficient fails to be continuous. All verifications use the explicit formulas and the cited interface items, with no choice principle beyond the declared Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice.
Depends on
- De Giorgi-Nash interior Holder regularity for divergence-form equations
- Local weak solutions of a divergence-form operator
- Uniformly elliptic divergence-form operators and their sesquilinear forms
- Local Hölder and scaled C-two-alpha norms on balls
- The notation $H^k$ and the reserved zero-boundary symbol
- Weak derivative of a locally integrable function
- Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- The Axiom of Choice
- Chain rule for globally Lipschitz scalar maps of Sobolev functions
- Zero-boundary Sobolev space as a norm closure
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
83 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Bozhidar Velichkov, Elliptic PDEs: Teorema di De Giorgi (Universita di Pisa; complete 7-page note, in Italian) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Brian Krummel, DeGiorgi-Nash lecture notes (15 March 2016; complete 9-page notes) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Leon Simon, Lectures on Partial Differential Equations (Stanford University; complete author scan, 118 sheets reproducing the 223 printed pages of the manuscript, two logical pages per sheet) (standard reference, not scraped)