Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

An interior stationary point adds a Fresnel-scale term

Example

For f(x)=1, g(x)=x2/2 on [−1,1], and ω≥1, the integral has an interior contribution of order ω−1/2 in addition to its order-ω−1 endpoint term: Iω(1,g;[−1,1])=2πωeiπ/4+2eiω/2iω+Rω,∣Rω∣≤Cω−3/2. The nonstationary expansion cannot be applied on the full interval because g′(0)=0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: f(x)=1, g(x)=x2/2 on [−1,1], and ω≥1.

[F1]

Stationary-phase expansion at one simple interior critical point: a single simple interior stationary point contributes f(x0)eiωg(x0)2π/∣ωg′′(x0)∣eisgn⁡(ωg′′(x0))π/4, with the endpoint term and an O(∣ω∣−3/2) remainder.

[F2]

Repeated integration by parts for a nonstationary oscillatory integral: the nonstationary branch requires ∣g′∣≥c>0 on the whole interval to which it is applied.

[F3]

The complex modulus is subadditive, ∣z+w∣≤∣z∣+∣w∣ (Conjugation is an involutive real-field automorphism, zz‾=∣z∣2, and modulus is definite, multiplicative, and subadditive).

Verification

1.1givenF1algebra

Here g′(x)=x, g′′(0)=1, and g(±1)=1/2. Applying [F1] at x0=0 gives the stationary term 2π/ωeiπ/4, while the endpoint bracket is 1iω(eiω/21−eiω/2−1)=2eiω/2iω. The remainder bound is the one in [F1].

2.1givenF1F2F3step 1.1algebra∎

Since g′(0)=0, no c>0 satisfies [F2] on [−1,1]. By [F3], the endpoint term and remainder together are bounded by 2/ω+Cω−3/2, both smaller than the stationary term's magnitude 2π/ω by a factor tending to zero. Thus the leading scale is ω−1/2, not the nonstationary integer-power expansion.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources