Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Repeated integration by parts for a nonstationary oscillatory integral

Statement

Let a<b, r≥1, ω∈R∖{0}, g∈Cr+1[a,b] be real-valued with ∣g′∣≥c>0, and h∈Cr[a,b] be complex-valued. With Tgh=(h/g′)′ and Tg0h=h as in Finite-interval oscillatory integral and phase convention, one has Iω(h,g;[a,b])=∑j=0r−1(−1)j(iω)j+1[Tgjh(x)g′(x)eiωg(x)]ab+(−1)r(iω)rIω(Tgrh,g;[a,b]). Consequently, ∣Iω(h,g;[a,b])−∑j=0r−1(−1)j(iω)j+1[Tgjh(x)g′(x)eiωg(x)]ab∣≤b−a∣ω∣r∥Tgrh∥∞. For fixed h,g,r, the remainder is O(∣ω∣−r); the constant is the displayed derivative norm, not a frequency-uniform assertion about varying h or g.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: a<b, the hypotheses in the Statement, and the componentwise complex Riemann integral from Finite-interval oscillatory integral and phase convention.

[F1]

Derivative of a complex oscillatory phase: (eiωg)′=iωg′eiωg.

[F2]

If u,v are differentiable on [a,b] with u′,v′ integrable, then ∫abuv′=u(b)v(b)−u(a)v(a)−∫abu′v: for real C1 functions u,v on a closed interval, ∫uv′=[uv]−∫u′v. Applying this to real and imaginary components gives the componentwise complex identity.

[F4]

For continuous complex z on [a,b], the componentwise definition of Finite-interval oscillatory integral and phase convention and the conjugation and modulus laws Conjugation is an involutive real-field automorphism, zz‾=∣z∣2, and modulus is definite, multiplicative, and subadditive give ∣∫abz∣≤∫ab∣z∣. If Z=∫z≠0, set ζ=Z‾/∣Z∣, so ∣ζ∣=1 and ∣Z∣=∫Re⁡(ζz). Since Re⁡(ζz)≤∣z∣, monotonicity from Linearity, monotonicity, the absolute-value estimate and coordinate-slice additivity for the Riemann integral in Rm proves the bound; the zero case is immediate.

Proof

1.1givenF1F2F3algebra

Since g′ is continuous and nowhere zero, [F3] makes h/g′ differentiable with derivative Tgh. Apply [F2] componentwise with u=h/g′ and v=eiωg. By [F1], v′=iωg′v, so rearranging gives Iω(h,g)=[(h/g′)v]ab/(iω)−Iω(Tgh,g)/(iω).

2.1givenF1F4step 1.1algebra∎

Apply step 1.1 successively to h,Tgh,…,Tgr−1h. At each application the final integral receives one further factor −1/(iω) and the next endpoint term receives the matching alternating sign, yielding the displayed finite sum and remainder. Since ∣eiωg(x)∣=1, [F4] bounds the remainder modulus by ∣ω∣−r∫ab∣Tgrh(x)∣ dx≤(b−a)∣ω∣−r∥Tgrh∥∞.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

41 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources