Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Neumann Laplacian has a zero constant mode

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice for the Sobolev interfaces. On (0,π), the real coefficient case of the divergence-form Laplacian (Uniformly elliptic divergence-form operators and their sesquilinear forms) has Neumann form aN(u,v)=∫0πu′v′ on H1(0,π;R) (Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms). The constant function u0≡1 satisfies aN(u0,v)=0=0⋅∫0πu0v for every v∈H1(0,π;R), so (0,1) is a weak Neumann eigenpair (The Neumann spectrum and the constant zero mode). For every integer k≥1, uk(x)=cos⁡(kx) is a weak Neumann eigenfunction with eigenvalue k2. The Neumann form is nonnegative and the constant mode has Rayleigh quotient 0, so the lowest weak Neumann eigenvalue on H1(0,π;R) is 0. On the mean-zero subspace {u∈H1(0,π;R):∫0πu=0} the first Rayleigh value is positive by Poincare--Wirtinger and at most 1, witnessed by cos⁡x. The constant mode is exactly the zero mode removed by the mean-zero restriction, in contrast with the Dirichlet problem, where constants are not admissible.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice; the interval (0,π); the Neumann form aN(u,v)=∫0πu′v′ on H1(0,π;R); the functions uk(x)=cos⁡(kx) for integers k≥0; and v∈H1(0,π;R).

[F1]

One-dimensional representatives: every class in H1(0,π) has an absolutely continuous representative v∗ on [0,π] with (v∗)′=v′ almost everywhere, and the fundamental theorem of calculus holds for it (One-dimensional W1,p functions have unique absolutely continuous representatives, Fundamental theorem of calculus for absolutely continuous functions, Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms).

[F3]

Neumann form and its zero mode: the natural Neumann weak identity has no boundary condition on the test function, the constant functions are weak Neumann eigenfunctions with eigenvalue 0, and the form is nonnegative with kernel the componentwise constants (The Neumann spectrum and the constant zero mode, Uniformly elliptic divergence-form operators and their sesquilinear forms, Zero-boundary Sobolev space as a norm closure).

[F4]

Mean-zero positivity: on the mean-zero subspace of a bounded connected extension domain the first Neumann Rayleigh value is positive, by Poincare--Wirtinger, and is characterised variationally (The first positive Neumann eigenvalue has the mean-zero Rayleigh characterisation, Poincare-Wirtinger on bounded connected extension domains by Rellich compactness, Dirichlet Laplacian eigenpairs on an interval).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1F1F2F3givenalgebra

The weak Neumann identities. By [F2], uk′ is continuously differentiable on [0,π], hence absolutely continuous (its derivative is bounded); with [F1], The product of two absolutely continuous functions is absolutely continuous makes uk′v∗ absolutely continuous with derivative uk′′v∗+uk′v′ almost everywhere, and the fundamental theorem [F1] gives ∫0πuk′v′=[uk′v∗]0π−∫0πuk′′v∗=0+k2∫0πukv, because the boundary term vanishes by [F2]. Thus aN(uk,v)=k2∫0πukv for every v∈H1(0,π;R); for k=0 this reads 0=0, giving the constant zero mode, and for k≥1 it says that cos⁡(kx) is a weak Neumann eigenfunction with eigenvalue k2.

2.1F3step 1.1givenalgebra

Lowest eigenvalue on all of H1. The form is aN(u,u)=∥u′∥L22≥0 with aN(u0,u0)=0 for the nonzero constant u0, so the infimum of the Rayleigh quotient over H1(0,π)∖{0} is 0, attained at the constants; in particular the lowest weak Neumann eigenvalue on H1(0,π) is 0.

3.1F3F4step 1.1givenalgebra∎

The mean-zero restriction. On the mean-zero subspace V={u:∫0πu=0} Poincare--Wirtinger [F4] gives a positive constant C with ∥u∥L2≤C∥u′∥L2, so the Rayleigh quotient on V∖{0} is bounded below by C−2>0, and by [F4] its infimum is the first positive Neumann Rayleigh value. Taking v=cos⁡x in step 1.1 gives aN(cos⁡x,cos⁡x)=∫0πsin⁡2x dx=π/2 while ∫0πcos⁡2x dx=π/2, so this value is at most 1; the constant mode is exactly the element removed by the mean-zero restriction, in contrast with the Dirichlet problem where constants are excluded by the zero-trace domain.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

100 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources