How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Reciprocal Gamma has order one and characteristic of size
Example
Let be the reciprocal Gamma function. Its zeros are simple and are exactly , and it has no poles. For every sufficiently large , Consequently its Nevanlinna order and lower order are both one.
Verification
Given: The characteristic and order conventions for meromorphic functions, the reciprocal-Gamma product, Gamma's meromorphic continuation, and the sectorial Stirling formula.
[F1] , where is the circular mean of (Counting, chordal proximity and characteristic).
[F2] The order and lower order are the limsup and liminf of for all sufficiently large with (Order and lower order from the Nevanlinna characteristic).
[F3] The reciprocal Gamma product converges locally uniformly on (The Weierstrass product for reciprocal Gamma).
[F4] For fixed , on the closed sector , with the principal logarithm in , as (Stirling's formula for Gamma).
[F5] Gamma is meromorphic on with simple poles exactly at the nonpositive integers (Meromorphic continuation of Gamma).
By [F3], the product defines an entire function . On every compact , for all large the series for is bounded by uniformly on , so the product tail is the exponential of a locally uniformly convergent sum and is nowhere zero. The finitely many factors then give simple zeros exactly at ; [F5] identifies these with the simple poles of the meromorphic continuation of , and has no poles.
Fix and . At a product zero the upper bound is immediate; otherwise . For , the summands are at most , with total . For , satisfies , so ; the tail is at most . Since , this gives uniformly on the circle, and hence .
Set and , a fixed arc in the closed sector . For with , [F3] identifies with and [F4] applies uniformly: writing its error as , . Since , , and , this is at least for all sufficiently large , uniformly on . This closed arc meets the exact sector hypotheses in [F4].
Integrating the lower bound of step 1.3 over the arc of length gives for all sufficiently large .
Since is entire, [F1] gives . The pointwise inequality gives . Steps 1.2 and 2.1 prove , so eventually. By [F2], , proving both order assertions.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Goldberg–Ostrovskii, Value Distribution of Meromorphic Functions, Ch. 2 §5, reciprocal-Gamma exercise, printed pp. 80–81 (standard reference, not scraped)
- K. Chandrasekharan, Lectures on the Riemann Zeta-Function, Lecture 7 §6, Stirling formula, printed pp. 60–62 (standard reference, not scraped)