How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A one-dimensional form attains the Lax--Milgram bound
Example
On with the standard inner product and , let and let for a fixed . Then is bounded with , coercive with the same constant , and the Lax--Milgram solution of for all is since for all forces . The solution operator has norm exactly : and , so Hence the bound of The Lax--Milgram solution operator has norm at most is attained and cannot be improved uniformly over coercive forms; this is the plan’s sharpness example and the one-dimensional model of the general estimate.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A real ; the Hilbert space with its usual inner product and modulus; the form ; and the functional for a fixed .
is sesquilinear, bounded with , and coercive with the same constant: and (Bounded, coercive and symmetric sesquilinear forms, Real and imaginary parts, complex conjugation, and modulus, Hilbert space).
Every conjugate-linear functional on has the form ; testing at directly determines the unique solution. The abstract comparison is The Lax--Milgram solution operator has norm at most , but no choice principle is needed for this scalar computation.
Operator norm: and (The operator norm as the least bound and as the unit-sphere or unit-ball supremum).
Proof
Direct solution: the equation reads for every . Testing with forces , that is ; conversely this satisfies the equation for every . The scalar equation also proves uniqueness directly.
Boundedness and coercivity constants: from the least bound is , and coercivity holds with since ; no larger coercivity constant can work at .
Norms: by [F3], and has modulus , so for every ; hence , attaining the bound of the corollary.
Conclusion: the estimate is sharp and cannot be improved uniformly over bounded coercive forms on a fixed Hilbert space; the one-dimensional computation is the model of the general constant.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Haim Brezis, Functional Analysis, Sobolev Spaces and Partial Differential Equations (Springer Universitext, 2011, complete 614-page text) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Leon Simon, Lectures on Partial Differential Equations (Stanford, complete 223-page author scan) (standard reference, not scraped)