How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
is both connected and anticonnected
Statement
The path is connected and anticonnected. Indeed, .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: with vertices and edges .
A graph is anticonnected when its complement is connected (Anticonnected graphs and anticonnected components).
Complement edges are precisely the nonedges between distinct vertices (Graph isomorphisms, automorphisms and graph complements).
Verification
The graph is connected.
Its complement has edges , which form the path . Thus and is connected.
Therefore is anticonnected as well as connected.
Remarks
\draw[<->,line width=.9pt] (4.2,0)--node[above,font=\scriptsize] {complement} (5.7,0);
\node[vertex] (b3) at (6.15,0) {$3$}; \node[vertex] (b1) at (7.4,0) {$1$}; \node[vertex] (b4) at (8.65,0) {$4$}; \node[vertex] (b2) at (9.9,0) {$2$}; \draw[edge] (b3)--(b1)--(b4)--(b2); \node[caption] at (8.025,-.7) {$\overline{P_4}$: edges $13,14,24$}; \end{tikzpicture} ```
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Cographs survey (Princeton PDF) (standard reference, not scraped)