Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Parallelizable tori have trivial stable normal class

Example

Assume AC. For n≥1 the torus Tn=Rn/Zn has trivial tangent bundle: left translations trivialize it, and the images of a basis of TeTn under the left-invariant framing form a global frame (Left-invariant vector fields evaluate isomorphically at the identity, Local and global frames of a vector bundle, A vector bundle is trivial if and only if it has a global frame; for n=2 see the two-dimensional torus The two-dimensional torus T2=(R/Z)2). Hence wˉ(Tn)=1 and pˉ(Tn)=1 (Parallelizable manifolds have no stable characteristic-class obstruction to Euclidean immersion): no Stiefel-Whitney or Pontryagin class test of this page obstructs an immersion of a torus into Euclidean space, and indeed Tn immerses in Rn+1 and hence in every Rn+k with k≥1. The example says nothing about embeddability: it exhibits a Euclidean formal immersion with trivial normal class, not an embedding theorem.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An integer n≥1, the torus Tn=Rn/Zn as the product of n copies of the circle group R/Z (a compact connected abelian Lie group), and AC.

[F1]

The product of n copies of the circle group is a compact connected abelian Lie group of dimension n, hence a torus in the sense of the Lie-group definition; for n=2 this is the two-dimensional torus T2=(R/Z)2 (Tori and maximal tori, The two-dimensional torus T2=(R/Z)2).

[F2]

Left-invariant vector fields on a Lie group evaluate isomorphically at the identity; equivalently the map carrying a vector v∈TeG to the left-invariant field with that value is an isomorphism onto the space of left-invariant fields (Left-invariant vector fields evaluate isomorphically at the identity).

[F3]

A global frame of a smooth rank-r bundle trivializes it: a bundle is trivial if and only if it has a global frame, and the frame determines the trivialization (Local and global frames of a vector bundle, A vector bundle is trivial if and only if it has a global frame).

[F4]

For a closed smooth M with trivial tangent bundle, the trivial bundle is a rank-k stable normal inverse for every k≥1, M immerses in Rm+k, and the normal classes vanish: wˉ(M)=1 and pˉ(M)=1 (Parallelizable manifolds have no stable characteristic-class obstruction to Euclidean immersion). The relevant countable choice is implied by AC (AC implies DC implies countable choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), The Axiom of Choice).

[F5]

A trivial positive-rank bundle has a nowhere-zero constant section, so its Euler class vanishes (A nowhere-zero section forces the Euler class to vanish).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1F1F2

By [F1] the torus Tn is a compact connected abelian Lie group of dimension n. Choose a basis v1,…,vn of the tangent space TeTn at the identity; by [F2] the corresponding left-invariant vector fields X1,…,Xn are smooth global sections of TTn whose values at e form a basis, and left invariance carries this basis to a basis of every tangent space TgTn (translation by g is a diffeomorphism and identifies TeTn with TgTn). Hence (X1,…,Xn) is a global frame of TTn, smooth by [F2].

2.1F2F3step 1.1

By [F3] the existence of the global frame of step 1.1 makes TTn trivial: TTn≅εn over Tn, with the trivialization determined by the frame.

3.1F4step 2.1

By [F4] applied to the closed manifold Tn with trivial tangent bundle, the trivial bundle is a rank-k stable normal inverse of Tn for every k≥1; consequently Tn immerses in Rn+k for every k≥1, in particular in Rn+1, and its normal classes are trivial: wˉ(Tn)=w(TTn)−1=1−1=1,pˉ(Tn)=p(TTn)−1=1−1=1.

4.1F4F5step 2.1step 3.1∎

Therefore no Stiefel-Whitney or Pontryagin class test of this page obstructs a Euclidean immersion of Tn: every class wˉi(Tn), pˉi(Tn) with i≥1 vanishes, and the Euler class of the trivial normal bundle vanishes as well. The example exhibits a Euclidean formal immersion with trivial normal class and says nothing about embeddability of tori; in particular it does not assert that Tn embeds in Rn+1 or in any other specific Euclidean space, nor does it identify a minimal immersion dimension below n+1. The only choice used is the AC assumed by the parallelizable-manifold proposition and its countable-choice input.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

39 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources