How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Normal, oblique, and grazing impedance reflection
Example
Write for . The reflected amplitude is It is at normal incidence, equals at , and tends to at grazing incidence.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , , and the reflection theorem [F1].
Verification
Given: , , and [F1].
Divide numerator and denominator of [F1] by to obtain . At , this is ; at , and it is .
As , continuity of cosine gives and the denominator tends to , so and . The endpoint is a limit; the propagating theorem assumed .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
2 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Galkowski, Lafontaine, and Spence, Local absorbing boundary conditions on fixed domains give order-one errors for high-frequency waves (standard reference, not scraped)