Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A weakly damped truncated layer can produce a resonant cavity response

Example

Consider the one-dimensional interval 0≤x≤L with Dirichlet endpoints, source point x0=L/2, and a PML beginning at x0, so X(x0)=x0 and X(L)=L+iS with S>0. For kL=(2m+1)π, m∈N0, the Green function of −d2/dX2−k2 at the source has magnitude ∣G(x0,x0)∣=coth⁡(kS)k∼1k2S(S↓0). When S=0, sin⁡(kx) is a nonzero homogeneous Dirichlet mode, so the real-frequency problem is resonant. This is a single interval example, not a universal stability claim about PMLs.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: L,k>0, integer m≥0, the stretched coordinate [F1], and the scalar Helmholtz Green equation [A1].

[F1]

Cartesian complex-stretch PML for a homogeneous Helmholtz mode: the coordinate is X=x+iS(x) with S≥0 and X(x0)=x0.

[F2]

Exact reflected-mode error from a finite Dirichlet-terminated PML: a finite Dirichlet-terminated layer has two-way reflected amplitude magnitude e−2qS for a propagating mode q>0.

[A1]

On a stretched interval of endpoint XL with Dirichlet conditions, the Green function solves (−d2/dX2−k2)G(X,X′)=δX′ and has derivative jump ∂XG(X′+,X′)−∂XG(X′−,X′)=−1.

Verification

Given: The interval data and [F1]–[F2], [A1].

1.1F1A1algebra

Parameterize the stretched contour by the real physical coordinate x∈[0,L]. For a source at x′, set x<=min⁡(x,x′), x>=max⁡(x,x′), and X<=X(x<), X>=X(x>). The functions y1(X)=sin⁡(kX) and y2(X)=sin⁡(k(XL−X)) solve the homogeneous equation and vanish at the respective endpoints; their Wronskian in the order y1y2′−y1′y2 is the constant −ksin⁡(kXL). Thus G(x,x′)=sin⁡(kX<)sin⁡(k(XL−X>))ksin⁡(kXL) has the endpoint conditions and solves the homogeneous equation away from x=x′. The real parameter orders the two sides of the contour, and the one-sided derivatives in the contour coordinate satisfy ∂XG∣x→x′+−∂XG∣x→x′−=−1, as required by [A1].

2.1givenF2step 1.1algebra∎

At X′=x0=L/2, XL=L+iS, and kL=(2m+1)π, the numerator magnitude is cosh⁡(kS) and the denominator magnitude is ksinh⁡(kS); this follows from sin⁡((m+1/2)π)=(−1)m and ∣sin⁡(nπ+it)∣=sinh⁡(t) for integer n and t>0. Hence ∣G(x0,x0)∣=coth⁡(kS)/k. Since sinh⁡t∼t and cosh⁡t→1 as t↓0, this is asymptotic to 1/(k2S). At S=0, sin⁡(kL)=0 and sin⁡(kx) satisfies both homogeneous Dirichlet conditions, proving resonance. The same damping parameter in [F2] gives round-trip reflected amplitude e−2kS→1, so the growing cavity response accompanies vanishing attenuation.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources