How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Poisson's equation with data gains two interior derivatives
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice where the existence of the weak solution is invoked; the regularity conclusion itself uses only Countable Choice. Let be a bounded open set, let , and let be a weak solution of the Dirichlet problem , that is, for every with (Weak Dirichlet solutions for a divergence-form operator). Assuming the Axiom of Choice, existence and uniqueness of such a are supplied by Existence and uniqueness for the weak Dirichlet Poisson problem when is nonempty; if , the zero class is the unique weak solution directly. The verification below uses only that is a weak solution. Then , and for every open there is with data gain two interior derivatives for the constant-coefficient Laplacian, and no boundary regularity of enters the interior conclusion.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice (for the existence statement only); a bounded open set ; ; and a weak solution of in the sense of Weak Dirichlet solutions for a divergence-form operator.
For with bounded, the weak Dirichlet formulation reads for every ; every such is a local weak solution of on , because and the local definition tests the smaller class. (Weak Dirichlet solutions for a divergence-form operator, Local weak solutions of a divergence-form operator)
The Laplacian is the divergence-form operator with , , : the coefficients are constant, hence in with and , uniformly elliptic with , and , . (Uniformly elliptic divergence-form operators and their sesquilinear forms)
Assume Countable Choice. Let be open and let be as in Uniformly elliptic divergence-form operators and their sesquilinear forms with , , and . If is a local weak solution of on , then and for every pair of open sets the theorem gives the interior estimate of Interior regularity for divergence-form equations. When , the estimate on is bounded by the global-norm estimate displayed in the statement because ; its constant may be written after fixing such an intermediate from and .
Assume the Axiom of Choice. If is nonempty, every has exactly one weak solution of the Dirichlet problem with zero boundary values; for with this supplies existence and uniqueness in the example. If , then and the zero class is the unique weak solution directly. (Existence and uniqueness for the weak Dirichlet Poisson problem)
Verification
Hypothesis check for [F3]. By [F2] the Laplacian has constant coefficients and , so it is admissible with , , and ; since is bounded and , also ; and by [F1] the weak solution is a local weak solution of on .
Fix any open and choose an open with . By step 1.1 the solution satisfies the hypotheses of [F3], so the theorem gives and Since , both local norms are bounded by the global norms in the statement. Fixing the intermediate set as a function of and therefore gives ; for the Laplacian all coefficient parameters are absolute and , so . Boundary regularity of is not part of the hypotheses of [F3], so it is not used; existence of is the only place the Axiom of Choice enters, through [F4] (with the empty-domain case handled directly). This proves the claimed two-derivative interior gain.
Source notes
Hunter's motivating computation for the Laplacian and Theorem 4.27 (printed pp. 110-114, read in full) state the interior estimate with and no boundary hypothesis; Laugesen's Theorem 5.6 (printed p. 108) is the same interior statement. The example isolates the constant-coefficient case: the coefficient constants in the estimate are absolute, so the constant depends only on , and the estimate does not improve when is smoother.
Depends on
- Interior $H^2$ regularity for divergence-form equations
- Local weak solutions of a divergence-form operator
- Weak Dirichlet solutions for a divergence-form operator
- Existence and uniqueness for the weak Dirichlet Poisson problem
- Uniformly elliptic divergence-form operators and their sesquilinear forms
- The Axiom of Choice
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
42 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John K. Hunter, Notes on Partial Differential Equations (UC Davis, revised 18 June 2014, complete 242-page two-quarter graduate notes) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Richard S. Laugesen, Linear Analysis and Partial Differential Equations (University of Illinois, 2020, complete 158-page graduate notes) (standard reference, not scraped)