Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The polynomial map (x,y)(1+x+2y+x2,2x+3y+xy)(x,y)\mapsto(1+x+2y+x^2,\,2x+3y+xy) and its Jacobian

Example

Let F(x,y)=(1+x+2y+x2,2x+3y+xy)F(x,y)=(1+x+2y+x^2,\,2x+3y+xy). Then FF is totally differentiable everywhere and

DF(x,y)=JF(x,y)=(1+2x22+y3+x).DF(x,y)=JF(x,y)=\begin{pmatrix}1+2x&2\\2+y&3+x\end{pmatrix}.

Facts & Assumptions

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

The four partial derivatives are 1+2x1+2x, 22, 2+y2+y, and 3+x3+x, by [L1] and derivative algebra.

L1L2
2.1

These polynomial partial derivatives are continuous everywhere, so [L2] gives total differentiability and identifies the derivative with the displayed Jacobian.

step 1.1L2algebra
3.1

Directly, the increment remainder is (h12,h1h2)(h_1^2,h_1h_2), whose norm divided by (h1,h2)2\|(h_1,h_2)\|_2 tends to zero, agreeing with step 2.1.

step 1.1step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 99 results over 23 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources