Alphabeta Math
Session-authored (Fable 5 assisted)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

6 results · all verified · 0 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 6 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

The Total Derivative: Examples and Counterexamples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-02Open item page →

The polynomial map (x,y)(1+x+2y+x2,2x+3y+xy)(x,y)\mapsto(1+x+2y+x^2,\,2x+3y+xy) and its Jacobian

Example

Let F(x,y)=(1+x+2y+x2,2x+3y+xy)F(x,y)=(1+x+2y+x^2,\,2x+3y+xy). Then FF is totally differentiable everywhere and

DF(x,y)=JF(x,y)=(1+2x22+y3+x).DF(x,y)=JF(x,y)=\begin{pmatrix}1+2x&2\\2+y&3+x\end{pmatrix}.

Facts & Assumptions

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

The four partial derivatives are 1+2x1+2x, 22, 2+y2+y, and 3+x3+x, by [L1] and derivative algebra.

L1L2
2.1

These polynomial partial derivatives are continuous everywhere, so [L2] gives total differentiability and identifies the derivative with the displayed Jacobian.

step 1.1L2algebra
3.1

Directly, the increment remainder is (h12,h1h2)(h_1^2,h_1h_2), whose norm divided by (h1,h2)2\|(h_1,h_2)\|_2 tends to zero, agreeing with step 2.1.

step 1.1step 2.1
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-02Open item page →

xy/(x2+y2)xy/(x^2+y^2) has both partial derivatives at the origin but is discontinuous there

Statement refuted

If both partial derivatives of a real function exist at a point, then the function is continuous there.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The function f(0,0)=0f(0,0)=0 and f(x,y)=xy/(x2+y2)f(x,y)=xy/(x^2+y^2) when (x,y)(0,0)(x,y)\ne(0,0).

[L1]

Partial derivatives are directional derivatives in the standard basis directions (Directional derivatives and partial derivatives of a map URmRnU\subseteq\mathbb{R}^m\to\mathbb{R}^n).

[L2]

A map is continuous at aa if its values tend to f(a)f(a) as the input tends to aa (Continuity of a map between metric spaces, at a point and globally, in the ε\varepsilon-δ\delta form).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

Both axis restrictions of ff are identically zero, so [L1] gives xf(0,0)=yf(0,0)=0\partial_xf(0,0)=\partial_yf(0,0)=0.

L1L2
2.1

On the punctured diagonal (t,t)(t,t), f(t,t)=1/2f(t,t)=1/2.

step 1.1L2algebra
3.1

As (t,t)(0,0)(t,t)\to(0,0) but the values in step 2.1 do not tend to f(0,0)=0f(0,0)=0, [L2] shows that ff is discontinuous at the origin.

step 1.1step 2.1
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-02Open item page →

x2y/(x4+y2)x^2y/(x^4+y^2) tends to zero on every line through the origin but not along y=x2y=x^2

Statement refuted

If a function tends to its proposed value along every straight line through a point, then it is continuous at that point.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: f(0,0)=0f(0,0)=0 and f(x,y)=x2y/(x4+y2)f(x,y)=x^2y/(x^4+y^2) away from the origin.

[L1]

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

On a line (x,y)=(ta,tb)(x,y)=(ta,tb) with b0b\ne0, f(ta,tb)=ta2b/(t2a4+b2)0f(ta,tb)=t a^2b/(t^2a^4+b^2)\to0; for b=0b=0 the restriction is identically zero.

L1
2.1

Along the parabola (x,y)=(t,t2)(x,y)=(t,t^2) with t0t\ne0, f(t,t2)=1/2f(t,t^2)=1/2.

step 1.1algebra
3.1

The nonlinear path tends to the origin but its values do not tend to 00, so [L1] shows that ff is not continuous there despite all straight-line tests.

step 1.1step 2.1
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-02Open item page →

x2y/(x2+y2)x^2y/(x^2+y^2) has every directional derivative at the origin but is not totally differentiable there

Statement refuted

If every directional derivative of a real function exists at a point, then the function is totally differentiable there.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: f(0,0)=0f(0,0)=0 and f(x,y)=x2y/(x2+y2)f(x,y)=x^2y/(x^2+y^2) away from the origin.

[L1]

The directional derivative is the derivative of tf(a+tv)t\mapsto f(a+tv) at zero (Directional derivatives and partial derivatives of a map URmRnU\subseteq\mathbb{R}^m\to\mathbb{R}^n).

[L2]

A total derivative computes every directional derivative, so vDvf(a)v\mapsto D_vf(a) would be the linear map Df(a)Df(a) applied to vv (A total derivative computes every directional derivative, and its matrix is the Jacobian).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

For v=(a,b)0v=(a,b)\ne0, f(ta,tb)=ta2b/(a2+b2)f(ta,tb)=t\,a^2b/(a^2+b^2), so [L1] gives Dvf(0,0)=a2b/(a2+b2)D_vf(0,0)=a^2b/(a^2+b^2); for v=0v=0 it is 00.

L1L2
2.1

This direction map has value 00 at (1,0)(1,0) and (0,1)(0,1) but value 1/21/2 at their sum (1,1)(1,1), so it is not additive.

step 1.1L2algebra
3.1

By [L2], total differentiability would make the directional-derivative map linear, contradicting step 2.1. Thus ff is not totally differentiable at the origin.

step 1.1step 2.1
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-02Open item page →

The map y(x2+y2)/xy(x^2+y^2)/x off the line x=0x=0, extended by zero on that line, has every directional derivative zero at the origin but is discontinuous there

Statement refuted

If every directional derivative at a point is zero, then the function is continuous there.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: f(x,y)=y(x2+y2)/xf(x,y)=y(x^2+y^2)/x for x0x\ne0, and f(0,y)=0f(0,y)=0.

[L1]

The directional derivative is the derivative of tf(a+tv)t\mapsto f(a+tv) at zero (Directional derivatives and partial derivatives of a map URmRnU\subseteq\mathbb{R}^m\to\mathbb{R}^n).

[L2]

Total differentiability gives a local O(h2)O(\|h\|_2) increment bound and therefore continuity (Total differentiability gives a local O(h2)O(\|h\|_2) increment bound and therefore continuity).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

Along (ta,tb)(ta,tb), the restriction is t2b(a2+b2)/at^2b(a^2+b^2)/a when a0a\ne0 and is 00 when a=0a=0; [L1] therefore gives zero directional derivative in every direction.

L1L2
2.1

Along the curve (x,y)=(t3,t)(x,y)=(t^3,t) with t0t\ne0, f(t3,t)=1+t41f(t^3,t)=1+t^4\to1.

step 1.1L2algebra
3.1

Thus ff is discontinuous at the origin, and by [L2] it cannot be totally differentiable there either.

step 1.1step 2.1
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-02Open item page →

A locally constant step map on the disconnected open set R{0}\mathbb{R}\setminus\{0\} has zero total derivative but is not globally Lipschitz

Statement refuted

A uniform total-derivative bound on every open domain implies a global Lipschitz bound on that domain.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: U=R{0}U=\mathbb R\setminus\{0\} and f:URf:U\to\mathbb R defined by f(x)=0f(x)=0 for x<0x<0 and f(x)=1f(x)=1 for x>0x>0.

[L1]

In the total-derivative definition, the normalized remainder tends to zero as hh tends to zero (The total (Fréchet) derivative Df(a)Df(a) as the linear first-order approximation with o(h2)o(\|h\|_2) remainder).

[L2]

A map is Lipschitz with constant LL when f(x)f(y)Lxy|f(x)-f(y)|\le L|x-y| for every pair of points in its domain (Lipschitz map, α\alpha-Hölder map for rational 0<α10 < \alpha \le 1, and contraction).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

Each xUx\in U has a small interval contained in its own component of UU, on which ff is constant; hence Df(x)=0Df(x)=0 by [L1].

L1L2
2.1

For any L0L\ge0, take t=1/(2(L+1))t=1/(2(L+1)). The points t,tU-t,t\in U satisfy f(t)f(t)=1>2Lt=Lt(t)|f(t)-f(-t)|=1>2Lt=L|t-(-t)|, so [L2] fails for that LL.

step 1.1L2algebra
3.1

The segment from t-t to tt contains 0U0\notin U, so UU is not convex; this is exactly the omitted hypothesis of the mean-value inequality.

step 1.1step 2.1

Sources