Alphabeta Math
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 6 results · all verified · 0 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 6 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

The Total Derivative: Examples and Counterexamples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-02Open item page →

The polynomial map (x,y)↦(1+x+2y+x2, 2x+3y+xy) and its Jacobian

Example

Let F(x,y)=(1+x+2y+x2, 2x+3y+xy). Then F is totally differentiable everywhere and

DF(x,y)=JF(x,y)=(1+2x22+y3+x).

Facts & Assumptions

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

The four partial derivatives are 1+2x, 2, 2+y, and 3+x, by [L1] and derivative algebra.

L1L2
2.1

These polynomial partial derivatives are continuous everywhere, so [L2] gives total differentiability and identifies the derivative with the displayed Jacobian.

step 1.1L2algebra
3.1

Directly, the increment remainder is (h12,h1h2), whose norm divided by ∥(h1,h2)∥2 tends to zero, agreeing with step 2.1.

step 1.1step 2.1∎
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-02Open item page →

xy/(x2+y2) has both partial derivatives at the origin but is discontinuous there

Statement refuted

If both partial derivatives of a real function exist at a point, then the function is continuous there.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The function f(0,0)=0 and f(x,y)=xy/(x2+y2) when (x,y)≠(0,0).

[L1]

Partial derivatives are directional derivatives in the standard basis directions (Directional derivatives and partial derivatives of a map U⊆Rm→Rn).

[L2]

A map is continuous at a if its values tend to f(a) as the input tends to a (Continuity of a map between metric spaces, at a point and globally, in the ε-δ form).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

Both axis restrictions of f are identically zero, so [L1] gives ∂xf(0,0)=∂yf(0,0)=0.

L1L2
2.1

On the punctured diagonal (t,t), f(t,t)=1/2.

step 1.1L2algebra
3.1

As (t,t)→(0,0) but the values in step 2.1 do not tend to f(0,0)=0, [L2] shows that f is discontinuous at the origin.

step 1.1step 2.1∎
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-02Open item page →

x2y/(x4+y2) tends to zero on every line through the origin but not along y=x2

Statement refuted

If a function tends to its proposed value along every straight line through a point, then it is continuous at that point.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: f(0,0)=0 and f(x,y)=x2y/(x4+y2) away from the origin.

[L1]

A vector-valued map is continuous at a when its limit at a equals its value there (Vector-valued functions f:A→Rm, their limits and continuity, with the dictionary to the metric notions).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

On a line (x,y)=(ta,tb) with b≠0, f(ta,tb)=ta2b/(t2a4+b2)→0; for b=0 the restriction is identically zero.

L1
2.1

Along the parabola (x,y)=(t,t2) with t≠0, f(t,t2)=1/2.

step 1.1algebra
3.1

The nonlinear path tends to the origin but its values do not tend to 0, so [L1] shows that f is not continuous there despite all straight-line tests.

step 1.1step 2.1∎
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-02Open item page →

x2y/(x2+y2) has every directional derivative at the origin but is not totally differentiable there

Statement refuted

If every directional derivative of a real function exists at a point, then the function is totally differentiable there.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: f(0,0)=0 and f(x,y)=x2y/(x2+y2) away from the origin.

[L1]

The directional derivative is the derivative of t↦f(a+tv) at zero (Directional derivatives and partial derivatives of a map U⊆Rm→Rn).

[L2]

A total derivative computes every directional derivative, so v↦Dvf(a) would be the linear map Df(a) applied to v (A total derivative computes every directional derivative, and its matrix is the Jacobian).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

For v=(a,b)≠0, f(ta,tb)=t a2b/(a2+b2), so [L1] gives Dvf(0,0)=a2b/(a2+b2); for v=0 it is 0.

L1L2
2.1

This direction map has value 0 at (1,0) and (0,1) but value 1/2 at their sum (1,1), so it is not additive.

step 1.1L2algebra
3.1

By [L2], total differentiability would make the directional-derivative map linear, contradicting step 2.1. Thus f is not totally differentiable at the origin.

step 1.1step 2.1∎
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-02Open item page →

The map y(x2+y2)/x off the line x=0, extended by zero on that line, has every directional derivative zero at the origin but is discontinuous there

Statement refuted

If every directional derivative at a point is zero, then the function is continuous there.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: f(x,y)=y(x2+y2)/x for x≠0, and f(0,y)=0.

[L1]

The directional derivative is the derivative of t↦f(a+tv) at zero (Directional derivatives and partial derivatives of a map U⊆Rm→Rn).

[L2]

Total differentiability gives a local O(∥h∥2) increment bound and therefore continuity (Total differentiability gives a local O(∥h∥2) increment bound and therefore continuity).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

Along (ta,tb), the restriction is t2b(a2+b2)/a when a≠0 and is 0 when a=0; [L1] therefore gives zero directional derivative in every direction.

L1L2
2.1

Along the curve (x,y)=(t3,t) with t≠0, f(t3,t)=1+t4→1.

step 1.1L2algebra
3.1

Thus f is discontinuous at the origin, and by [L2] it cannot be totally differentiable there either.

step 1.1step 2.1∎
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-02Open item page →

A locally constant step map on the disconnected open set R∖{0} has zero total derivative but is not globally Lipschitz

Statement refuted

A uniform total-derivative bound on every open domain implies a global Lipschitz bound on that domain.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: U=R∖{0} and f:U→R defined by f(x)=0 for x<0 and f(x)=1 for x>0.

[L1]

In the total-derivative definition, the normalized remainder tends to zero as h tends to zero (The total (Fréchet) derivative Df(a) as the linear first-order approximation with o(∥h∥2) remainder).

[L2]

A map is Lipschitz with constant L when ∣f(x)−f(y)∣≤L∣x−y∣ for every pair of points in its domain (Lipschitz map, α-Hölder map for rational 0<α≤1, and contraction).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

Each x∈U has a small interval contained in its own component of U, on which f is constant; hence Df(x)=0 by [L1].

L1L2
2.1

For any L≥0, take t=1/(2(L+1)). The points −t,t∈U satisfy ∣f(t)−f(−t)∣=1>2Lt=L∣t−(−t)∣, so [L2] fails for that L.

step 1.1L2algebra
3.1

The segment from −t to t contains 0∉U, so U is not convex; this is exactly the omitted hypothesis of the mean-value inequality.

step 1.1step 2.1∎

Sources