How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
, , and satisfying
Example
The first few powers of are
and each is strictly larger than the one before ( and ; and for exponentiation is strictly increasing with , clause (b)). Iterating the exponential produces the -tower
so , , and so on. Its supremum
is a limit ordinal satisfying
so it is a fixed point of . This is exhibited here by hand: the tower is written down, its supremum is taken, and the fixed point equation is proved from continuity at limits. No fixed-point theorem is used, and none that this library proves applies here: every fixed-point theorem on disk is stated for a set carrying an order or a metric, whereas is a class operation on the ordinals, which are not a set.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The ordinals with the operations of Ordinal multiplication and Ordinal exponentiation , with the conventions and , and the least limit ordinal ( is the least limit ordinal, The natural numbers (von Neumann)).
, , and for limit (Ordinal exponentiation , with the conventions and ).
For : implies ; and for every nonempty with (claims (b) and (c) of and ; and for exponentiation is strictly increasing with ). Also (claim (a) of the same).
Recursion along the ordinals: a class rule defined on functions with ordinal domain determines exactly one class function on the ordinals (Transfinite recursion along the ordinals: a class rule determines exactly one operation defined at every ordinal).
is an ordinal and the least upper bound of a set of ordinals; iff or ; ; and iff (Basic closure properties of ordinals, Trichotomy and well-ordering of the ordinals, Ordinal (von Neumann)).
is a limit ordinal, closed under successor, with , and every ordinal in is or a successor ( is the least limit ordinal, Successor and limit ordinals); every ordinal is exactly one of , a successor, or a limit (Successor and limit ordinals).
Induction on : a subset of containing and closed under equals , and (The principle of mathematical induction, The natural numbers (von Neumann)).
Verification
by [L2]; by [L1]; and , since gives by [L2] with base .
Define a class function on functions with ordinal domain by if , if , and if is a limit; the three cases are exhaustive and exclusive by [L5], so [L3] gives a unique class function on the ordinals with and . Write for ; then , , and is a set by Replacement.
for every : let ; then , because by step 1.1 and step 1.2; and implies , because applying [L2] with base to gives , that is ; so by [L7].
is an ordinal by [L4]; each satisfies by step 2.1 and [L4], so and is nonempty with ; because ; and is not a successor, since would put for some , whence by [L4], which [L4] forbids; so is a limit ordinal by [L5].
: by [L2] with base applied to the nonempty with , one gets by step 1.2; and that supremum is , because each while conversely for every by step 2.1 and [L4], so the union over the shifted family contains .
So , the tower , is strictly increasing, and its supremum is a limit ordinal with .
Remarks
Why Transfinite recursion along the ordinals: a class rule determines exactly one operation defined at every ordinal and not the recursion theorem over . The published The recursion theorem builds from a function on a set . Here the step is , a class operation with no set-sized codomain available at this point, so the recursion theorem does not apply as stated. Transfinite recursion along the ordinals: a class rule determines exactly one operation defined at every ordinal is exactly the class-valued version, and Replacement then makes the range a set.
What is proved and what is not. That is a fixed point of is proved above. That it is the least such fixed point is true and is not proved here; it would follow from the observation that any fixed point is closed under the tower, and it needs nothing new, but nothing on these pages uses it. No general theory of normal functions or of the Veblen hierarchy is developed, and none is needed for the statement above.
and the Cantor normal form. By Cantor normal form: every nonzero ordinal is with and each a nonzero natural number, in exactly one way every nonzero ordinal has a unique base- normal form. For that form is , whose exponent is itself, so the normal form does not reduce to strictly smaller data. Below it always does, and that is the sense in which is where base- notation runs out.
Cardinality is a separate question, and this page does not settle it. Nothing above says how large or is as a set. Showing them at most countable would need the countable ordinals to be closed under ordinal exponentiation, which is not proved anywhere in this library; the natural route runs through Assuming countable choice: every at most countable subset of is bounded below , so no at most countable subset of is cofinal in it, and a supremum of at most countably many at most countable ordinals is at most countable and a transfinite induction that no item here carries out. What the tower demonstrates is growth in order type, which is the invariant this page is about.
Depends on
- Ordinal exponentiation $\alpha^{\beta}$, with the conventions $\alpha^{0} = 1$ and $0^{0} = 1$
- Ordinal multiplication $\alpha \cdot \beta$
- $\alpha^{\beta+\gamma} = \alpha^{\beta}\cdot\alpha^{\gamma}$ and $(\alpha^{\beta})^{\gamma} = \alpha^{\beta\cdot\gamma}$; and for $\alpha > 1$ exponentiation is strictly increasing with $\beta \le \alpha^{\beta}$
- Monotonicity of ordinal $+$ and $\cdot$: strictly increasing and continuous in the right argument, weakly increasing in the left, with left cancellation, and the identities $0 + \beta = \beta$ and $1 \cdot \beta = \beta$
- Transfinite recursion along the ordinals: a class rule determines exactly one operation defined at every ordinal
- The principle of mathematical induction
- Cantor normal form: every nonzero ordinal is $\omega^{\beta_0}\cdot c_0 + \cdots + \omega^{\beta_{k-1}}\cdot c_{k-1}$ with $\beta_0 > \cdots > \beta_{k-1}$ and each $c_i$ a nonzero natural number, in exactly one way
- Successor and limit ordinals
- $\omega$ is the least limit ordinal
- Basic closure properties of ordinals
- Trichotomy and well-ordering of the ordinals
- The natural numbers $\mathbb{N}$ (von Neumann)
- Ordinal (von Neumann)
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 58 results over 26 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Epsilon number (mathematics) (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ordinal arithmetic (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- T. Jech, Set Theory, 3rd millennium ed., Ch. 2 (Ordinal numbers) (standard reference, not scraped)
- A. Marks, Set Theory (standard reference, not scraped)