Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-29
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

ω2\omega^{2}, ωω\omega^{\omega}, and ε0=sup{ω,ωω,ωωω,}\varepsilon_0 = \sup\{\omega, \omega^{\omega}, \omega^{\omega^{\omega}}, \dots\} satisfying ωε0=ε0\omega^{\varepsilon_0} = \varepsilon_0

Example

The first few powers of ω\omega are

ω1=ω,ω2=ωω,ωω=sup{ωn:0<n<ω},\omega^{1} = \omega, \qquad \omega^{2} = \omega \cdot \omega, \qquad \omega^{\omega} = \sup\{\, \omega^{n} : 0 < n < \omega \,\},

and each is strictly larger than the one before (αβ+γ=αβαγ\alpha^{\beta+\gamma} = \alpha^{\beta}\cdot\alpha^{\gamma} and (αβ)γ=αβγ(\alpha^{\beta})^{\gamma} = \alpha^{\beta\cdot\gamma}; and for α>1\alpha > 1 exponentiation is strictly increasing with βαβ\beta \le \alpha^{\beta}, clause (b)). Iterating the exponential produces the ω\omega-tower

t0=ω,tn+1=ωtn,t_0 = \omega, \qquad t_{n+1} = \omega^{t_n},

so t1=ωωt_1 = \omega^{\omega}, t2=ωωωt_2 = \omega^{\omega^{\omega}}, and so on. Its supremum

ε0  :=  sup{tn:nω}\varepsilon_0 \;:=\; \sup\{\, t_n : n \in \omega \,\}

is a limit ordinal satisfying

ωε0=ε0,\omega^{\varepsilon_0} = \varepsilon_0,

so it is a fixed point of βωβ\beta \mapsto \omega^{\beta}. This is exhibited here by hand: the tower is written down, its supremum is taken, and the fixed point equation is proved from continuity at limits. No fixed-point theorem is used, and none that this library proves applies here: every fixed-point theorem on disk is stated for a set carrying an order or a metric, whereas βωβ\beta \mapsto \omega^{\beta} is a class operation on the ordinals, which are not a set.

Facts & Assumptions

[L1]

α0=1\alpha^{0} = 1, αδ+=αδα\alpha^{\delta^{+}} = \alpha^{\delta} \cdot \alpha, and αλ=sup{αβ:0<β<λ}\alpha^{\lambda} = \sup\{\alpha^{\beta} : 0 < \beta < \lambda\} for limit λ\lambda (Ordinal exponentiation αβ\alpha^{\beta}, with the conventions α0=1\alpha^{0} = 1 and 00=10^{0} = 1).

[L2]

For α>1\alpha > 1: β<γ\beta < \gamma implies αβ<αγ\alpha^{\beta} < \alpha^{\gamma}; and αλ=sup{αη:ηD}\alpha^{\lambda} = \sup\{\alpha^{\eta} : \eta \in D\} for every nonempty DλD \subseteq \lambda with supD=λ\sup D = \lambda (claims (b) and (c) of αβ+γ=αβαγ\alpha^{\beta+\gamma} = \alpha^{\beta}\cdot\alpha^{\gamma} and (αβ)γ=αβγ(\alpha^{\beta})^{\gamma} = \alpha^{\beta\cdot\gamma}; and for α>1\alpha > 1 exponentiation is strictly increasing with βαβ\beta \le \alpha^{\beta}). Also α1=α\alpha^{1} = \alpha (claim (a) of the same).

[L3]

Recursion along the ordinals: a class rule defined on functions with ordinal domain determines exactly one class function on the ordinals (Transfinite recursion along the ordinals: a class rule determines exactly one operation defined at every ordinal).

[L4]

A\bigcup A is an ordinal and the least upper bound of a set AA of ordinals; μν\mu \subseteq \nu iff μν\mu \in \nu or μ=ν\mu = \nu; μμ\mu \notin \mu; and μ<ν\mu < \nu iff μ+ν\mu^{+} \le \nu (Basic closure properties of ordinals, Trichotomy and well-ordering of the ordinals, Ordinal (von Neumann)).

[L5]

ω\omega is a limit ordinal, closed under successor, with 1ω1 \in \omega, and every ordinal in ω\omega is 00 or a successor (ω\omega is the least limit ordinal, Successor and limit ordinals); every ordinal is exactly one of 00, a successor, or a limit (Successor and limit ordinals).

[L7]

Induction on N\mathbb{N}: a subset of N\mathbb{N} containing 00 and closed under σ\sigma equals N\mathbb{N}, and σ(n)=n+\sigma(n) = n^{+} (The principle of mathematical induction, The natural numbers N\mathbb{N} (von Neumann)).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

ω1=ω\omega^{1} = \omega by [L2]; ω2=ω1+=ω1ω=ωω\omega^{2} = \omega^{1^{+}} = \omega^{1} \cdot \omega = \omega \cdot \omega by [L1]; and ω<ωω\omega < \omega^{\omega}, since 1<ω1 < \omega gives ω=ω1<ωω\omega = \omega^{1} < \omega^{\omega} by [L2] with base ω>1\omega > 1.

L1L2L5L6
1.2

Define a class function GG on functions hh with ordinal domain β\beta by G(h)=ωG(h) = \omega if β=0\beta = 0, G(h)=ωh(δ)G(h) = \omega^{h(\delta)} if β=δ+\beta = \delta^{+}, and G(h)=0G(h) = 0 if β\beta is a limit; the three cases are exhaustive and exclusive by [L5], so [L3] gives a unique class function FF on the ordinals with F(0)=ωF(0) = \omega and F(δ+)=ωF(δ)F(\delta^{+}) = \omega^{F(\delta)}. Write tn=F(n)t_n = F(n) for nωn \in \omega; then t0=ωt_0 = \omega, tn+=ωtnt_{n^{+}} = \omega^{t_n}, and T={tn:nω}T = \{t_n : n \in \omega\} is a set by Replacement.

L3L5construct
2.1

tn<tn+t_n < t_{n^{+}} for every nωn \in \omega: let S={nω:tn<tn+}S = \{n \in \omega : t_n < t_{n^{+}}\}; then 0S0 \in S, because t0=ω<ωω=t0+t_0 = \omega < \omega^{\omega} = t_{0^{+}} by step 1.1 and step 1.2; and nSn \in S implies σ(n)=n+S\sigma(n) = n^{+} \in S, because applying [L2] with base ω>1\omega > 1 to tn<tn+t_n < t_{n^{+}} gives ωtn<ωtn+\omega^{t_n} < \omega^{t_{n^{+}}}, that is tn+<t(n+)+t_{n^{+}} < t_{(n^{+})^{+}}; so S=ωS = \omega by [L7].

step 1.1step 1.2L2L7
3.1

ε0:=T\varepsilon_0 := \bigcup T is an ordinal by [L4]; each tnt_n satisfies tn<tn+ε0t_n < t_{n^{+}} \subseteq \varepsilon_0 by step 2.1 and [L4], so Tε0T \subseteq \varepsilon_0 and TT is nonempty with supT=ε0\sup T = \varepsilon_0; ε00\varepsilon_0 \ne 0 because t0=ωε0t_0 = \omega \in \varepsilon_0; and ε0\varepsilon_0 is not a successor, since ε0=μ+\varepsilon_0 = \mu^{+} would put μtn\mu \in t_n for some nn, whence μ+tn<tn+ε0=μ+\mu^{+} \le t_n < t_{n^{+}} \le \varepsilon_0 = \mu^{+} by [L4], which [L4] forbids; so ε0\varepsilon_0 is a limit ordinal by [L5].

step 2.1step 1.2L4L5
4.1

ωε0=ε0\omega^{\varepsilon_0} = \varepsilon_0: by [L2] with base ω>1\omega > 1 applied to the nonempty D=Tε0D = T \subseteq \varepsilon_0 with supT=ε0\sup T = \varepsilon_0, one gets ωε0=sup{ωtn:nω}=sup{tn+:nω}\omega^{\varepsilon_0} = \sup\{\omega^{t_n} : n \in \omega\} = \sup\{t_{n^{+}} : n \in \omega\} by step 1.2; and that supremum is ε0\varepsilon_0, because each tn+ε0t_{n^{+}} \subseteq \varepsilon_0 while conversely tntn+t_n \subseteq t_{n^{+}} for every nn by step 2.1 and [L4], so the union over the shifted family contains T=ε0\bigcup T = \varepsilon_0.

step 3.1step 2.1step 1.2L2L4
5.1

So ω2=ωω\omega^{2} = \omega \cdot \omega, the tower t0=ωt_0 = \omega, tn+=ωtnt_{n^{+}} = \omega^{t_n} is strictly increasing, and its supremum ε0\varepsilon_0 is a limit ordinal with ωε0=ε0\omega^{\varepsilon_0} = \varepsilon_0.

step 4.1step 3.1step 2.1step 1.1

Remarks

Why Transfinite recursion along the ordinals: a class rule determines exactly one operation defined at every ordinal and not the recursion theorem over N\mathbb{N}. The published The recursion theorem builds g:NAg : \mathbb{N} \to A from a function f:AAf : A \to A on a set AA. Here the step is βωβ\beta \mapsto \omega^{\beta}, a class operation with no set-sized codomain available at this point, so the recursion theorem does not apply as stated. Transfinite recursion along the ordinals: a class rule determines exactly one operation defined at every ordinal is exactly the class-valued version, and Replacement then makes the range {tn:nω}\{t_n : n \in \omega\} a set.

What is proved and what is not. That ε0\varepsilon_0 is a fixed point of βωβ\beta \mapsto \omega^{\beta} is proved above. That it is the least such fixed point is true and is not proved here; it would follow from the observation that any fixed point is closed under the tower, and it needs nothing new, but nothing on these pages uses it. No general theory of normal functions or of the Veblen hierarchy is developed, and none is needed for the statement above.

ε0\varepsilon_0 and the Cantor normal form. By Cantor normal form: every nonzero ordinal is ωβ0c0++ωβk1ck1\omega^{\beta_0}\cdot c_0 + \cdots + \omega^{\beta_{k-1}}\cdot c_{k-1} with β0>>βk1\beta_0 > \cdots > \beta_{k-1} and each cic_i a nonzero natural number, in exactly one way every nonzero ordinal has a unique base-ω\omega normal form. For ε0\varepsilon_0 that form is ωε01\omega^{\varepsilon_0} \cdot 1, whose exponent is ε0\varepsilon_0 itself, so the normal form does not reduce ε0\varepsilon_0 to strictly smaller data. Below ε0\varepsilon_0 it always does, and that is the sense in which ε0\varepsilon_0 is where base-ω\omega notation runs out.

Cardinality is a separate question, and this page does not settle it. Nothing above says how large ωω\omega^{\omega} or ε0\varepsilon_0 is as a set. Showing them at most countable would need the countable ordinals to be closed under ordinal exponentiation, which is not proved anywhere in this library; the natural route runs through Assuming countable choice: every at most countable subset of ω1\omega_1 is bounded below ω1\omega_1, so no at most countable subset of ω1\omega_1 is cofinal in it, and a supremum of at most countably many at most countable ordinals is at most countable and a transfinite induction that no item here carries out. What the tower demonstrates is growth in order type, which is the invariant this page is about.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 58 results over 26 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources