How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The projective-line diagonal from the bihomogeneous equation
Example
For every scheme , the diagonal of is the closed subscheme of cut out by the bihomogeneous equation , read in the two pairs of homogeneous coordinates and . On the four products of standard charts the equation becomes which is the equality of the two chart coordinates on the overlap in each case. Over for a field this is the classical description of the diagonal of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A scheme , the relative projective line with its two standard charts and coordinates on , on , the second factor with charts and coordinates , , and the diagonal of .
The charts are affine and cover ; on an affine base one has , and , all compatible with base change. (Relative projective space from standard charts)
For the restriction of to is the closed immersion of the affine overlap cut out in the chart-product coordinate ring by and for ; for the chart form is the difference of the two coordinates. These generators are dehomogenized forms of . (The relative projective-space diagonal is closed)
For ring maps , the fibre product of the affine spectra is . (Affine fibre products are spectra of tensor products)
Verification
Over an affine base the four products of charts are affine by [F3]: , , , .
The equation is bihomogeneous of bidegree , so its restriction to each product of charts is obtained by dividing by the two chosen coordinates; this gives the four displayed equations in the order .
On the equation becomes , which is the difference of the two copies of the coordinate ; by [F2] this is the chart form of the diagonal, and , , exhibits it as a closed immersion with image the diagonal copy of .
On the equation becomes , exactly [F2]'s mixed-chart generator up to sign, with and ; the quotient is via , so the diagonal over this chart product is the closed subscheme isomorphic to the overlap .
The remaining two products are obtained from steps 2.1 and 2.2 by swapping the two factors: on the equation becomes , and on it becomes .
Both sides are compatible with base change along any by [F1], so the four chart computations glue: on every standard chart product the diagonal is the closed subscheme cut out by , which is the assertion.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Schemes, Example 26.21.8 (tag 01KQ), printed p.41 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ravi Vakil, The Rising Sea, Proposition 11.3.8, printed pp.309-310 (standard reference, not scraped)