How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The diagonal of the affine line
Example
Let be a commutative unital ring and , and let with structure morphism . Then the diagonal is a closed immersion into whose ideal is . Consequently is separated, and for this is the diagonal of . If instead is an arbitrary scheme and , then on each affine open the same equation cuts out the diagonal, so the formula glues over an arbitrary base.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative unital ring , the affine scheme , the affine line over with structure morphism , and the diagonal .
For every morphism the diagonal is the unique morphism with . (The diagonal morphism)
For ring maps and there is an isomorphism , with the projections corresponding to and . (Affine fibre products are spectra of tensor products)
For a ring , closed immersions are, up to unique isomorphism over , precisely the morphisms for ideals . (Closed immersions into affine schemes are quotient spectra)
A morphism is a closed immersion if and only if its restriction to every member of an open cover of the target is a closed immersion. (Closed immersions are local on the target)
For a base change of , the diagonal of is the base change of along ; in particular it is determined on each open of the target by . (The diagonal commutes with base change)
For any two schemes with morphisms to a common scheme the fibre product exists, so is a scheme over ; over it is by [F2]. (Existence of all scheme fibre products)
Verification
By [F2] applied to twice, , and the latter is with corresponding to and to .
By [F1] the diagonal corresponds, under the identification of step 1.1, to a ring map with and , namely the multiplication , .
The map is surjective, and its kernel is : writing with , the map is the -algebra map sending to , whose kernel is the principal ideal .
By [F3] the closed subscheme of with ideal is presentable as , and , , , is an isomorphism of -algebras; hence the diagonal is exactly the closed subscheme and in particular a closed immersion.
Now let be arbitrary and as in [F6], and let be an affine open. Base changing along produces the affine line over , whose diagonal is cut out by as computed in step 4.1, and by [F5] these local diagonal conditions are the restrictions to the open subscheme of the product. Since these products over an affine open cover of cover , [F4] shows that the diagonal of is a closed immersion cut out by on each such piece, and by [F1] and [F3] its ideal in the chart ring is .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Schemes, Lemma 26.21.1 (tag 01KI) and Definition 26.21.3, printed pp.39-40 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ravi Vakil, The Rising Sea, Proposition 11.3.1, printed pp.306-307 (standard reference, not scraped)