Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Two-bit parity path and sparse normalization

Example

For n=2, both path weights are 1/2. Starting from ∣0,0⟩, the four input strings give xweighted pathparity⁡(x)00∣0,0⟩  −  ∣1,0⟩  −  ∣2,0⟩001∣0,0⟩  −  ∣1,0⟩  −  ∣2,1⟩110∣0,0⟩  −  ∣1,1⟩  −  ∣2,1⟩111∣0,0⟩  −  ∣1,1⟩  −  ∣2,0⟩0 Each displayed edge has matrix entry 1/2. The sparse normalization of Correctness and access cost of sparse block encoding is αsp=2/2=2, and at time t=π the endpoint state is −∣2,parity⁡(x)⟩.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The path family of Sparse parity-path transfer and norm with n=2.

[F1]

Sparse parity-path transfer and norm: the path weights are wi=i(n+1−i)/n, and the exact time-πn/2 evolution sends ∣0,0⟩ to (−i)n∣n,parity⁡(x)⟩.

[F2]

Correctness and access cost of sparse block encoding: a dH-row-sparse Hermitian matrix with maximum entry magnitude hmax⁡>0 has sparse normalization dHhmax⁡.

[F3]

Sparse Hamiltonian no-fast-forwarding: the dyadically rounded path family has at-most-two sparsity, constant sparse normalization, and an Ω(n) simulation lower bound at time πn/2 in the specified row-location/value XOR-oracle model.

Proof

Given: As in Facts & Assumptions.

1.1F1givenalgebra

Substituting n=2 gives w1=w2=2/2. For b∈{0,1}, edge 1 joins ∣0,b⟩ to ∣1,b⊕x1⟩, and edge 2 joins ∣1,b⟩ to ∣2,b⊕x2⟩. Starting with b=0, these two edges produce the four paths in the table; each endpoint bit is x1⊕x2. Each internal path vertex has degree two and each endpoint degree one.

2.1F2F3step 1.1algebra

Therefore dH=2 and hmax⁡=1/2, so [F2] gives αsp=dHhmax⁡=2. This exact-weight example illustrates the path underlying [F3], whose lower bound instead uses rounded weights: at n=2 its grid exponent is b=5, so its two weights are 23/32 and its sparse normalization is 23/16. Thus [F3] does not identify this exact matrix with its rounded family or supply a lower bound for arbitrary block-encoding access.

3.1F1step 1.1algebra∎

In the parity-free basis, the path matrix is H0=12(010101010),H02=12(101020101). Its eigenvalues are 1,0,−1, so spectral functional calculus gives e−iπH0=I−2H02, which sends ∣0⟩ to −∣2⟩. The prefix-parity basis permutation of [F1] restores the endpoint bit x1⊕x2; equivalently, [F1] gives (−i)2=−1 times the same endpoint.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources