Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Qubitization and Near-Optimal Hamiltonian Simulation — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

The two-dimensional example computes the clean block and signal complement at x=0 and x=±1. The degree-two Chebyshev example separates the real-even and imaginary-odd terms and applies the certified Bessel-tail bound. The two-bit path example lists all four input paths, checks their endpoint parity, computes the sparse normalization, and verifies the time-π transfer by a finite matrix calculation.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Two-dimensional Hermitian block-encoding signal

Example

Fix α>0, x∈[−1,1], s=1−x2, and take one-dimensional system H=C with K=[αx]. On a one-qubit ancilla define Ux=(xss−x),Jz=∣0⟩z,Π=∣0⟩⟨0∣. This is an exact Hermitian block encoding of K/α=[x]. Its signal complement has amplitude s; at x=0 the signal matrix is X, while at x=±1 the clean line is invariant and the normalized complement is not defined or needed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: α>0, x∈[−1,1], and the standard orthonormal ancilla basis ∣0⟩,∣1⟩.

[F1]

Hermitian block-encoding signal subspaces: for a normalized Hermitian block eigenvalue x, the non-endpoint signal matrix has entries x,1−x2, and the endpoint complement is absent without division by zero.

Proof

Given: As in Facts & Assumptions.

1.1givenalgebra

Since s2=1−x2, direct multiplication gives Ux∗=Ux and Ux2=I. Also J∗UxJ=[x]=K/α, so Ux is unitary and has the claimed block encoding. Its clean and complementary components are Ux∣0⟩=x∣0⟩+s∣1⟩.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra

If ∣x∣<1, then s>0, so the normalized complement defined in [F1] is ∣1⟩; both input and output paired bases are (∣0⟩,∣1⟩), and the matrix is exactly Ux. At x=0, s=1, hence U0=X, confirming that zero is a regular two-dimensional signal plane.

3.1F1step 1.1algebra∎

If x=1 or x=−1, then s=0 and Ux∣0⟩=x∣0⟩=Ux∗∣0⟩. No complement vector is normalized in these cases; this verifies the endpoint convention and the encoded eigenvalue λ/α=x.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedOpen item page →

Two-bit parity path and sparse normalization

Example

For n=2, both path weights are 1/2. Starting from ∣0,0⟩, the four input strings give xweighted pathparity⁡(x)00∣0,0⟩  −  ∣1,0⟩  −  ∣2,0⟩001∣0,0⟩  −  ∣1,0⟩  −  ∣2,1⟩110∣0,0⟩  −  ∣1,1⟩  −  ∣2,1⟩111∣0,0⟩  −  ∣1,1⟩  −  ∣2,0⟩0 Each displayed edge has matrix entry 1/2. The sparse normalization of Correctness and access cost of sparse block encoding is αsp=2/2=2, and at time t=π the endpoint state is −∣2,parity⁡(x)⟩.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The path family of Sparse parity-path transfer and norm with n=2.

[F1]

Sparse parity-path transfer and norm: the path weights are wi=i(n+1−i)/n, and the exact time-πn/2 evolution sends ∣0,0⟩ to (−i)n∣n,parity⁡(x)⟩.

[F2]

Correctness and access cost of sparse block encoding: a dH-row-sparse Hermitian matrix with maximum entry magnitude hmax⁡>0 has sparse normalization dHhmax⁡.

[F3]

Sparse Hamiltonian no-fast-forwarding: the dyadically rounded path family has at-most-two sparsity, constant sparse normalization, and an Ω(n) simulation lower bound at time πn/2 in the specified row-location/value XOR-oracle model.

Proof

Given: As in Facts & Assumptions.

1.1F1givenalgebra

Substituting n=2 gives w1=w2=2/2. For b∈{0,1}, edge 1 joins ∣0,b⟩ to ∣1,b⊕x1⟩, and edge 2 joins ∣1,b⟩ to ∣2,b⊕x2⟩. Starting with b=0, these two edges produce the four paths in the table; each endpoint bit is x1⊕x2. Each internal path vertex has degree two and each endpoint degree one.

2.1F2F3step 1.1algebra

Therefore dH=2 and hmax⁡=1/2, so [F2] gives αsp=dHhmax⁡=2. This exact-weight example illustrates the path underlying [F3], whose lower bound instead uses rounded weights: at n=2 its grid exponent is b=5, so its two weights are 23/32 and its sparse normalization is 23/16. Thus [F3] does not identify this exact matrix with its rounded family or supply a lower bound for arbitrary block-encoding access.

3.1F1step 1.1algebra∎

In the parity-free basis, the path matrix is H0=12(010101010),H02=12(101020101). Its eigenvalues are 1,0,−1, so spectral functional calculus gives e−iπH0=I−2H02, which sends ∣0⟩ to −∣2⟩. The prefix-parity basis permutation of [F1] restores the endpoint bit x1⊕x2; equivalently, [F1] gives (−i)2=−1 times the same endpoint.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedOpen item page →

Low-degree Chebyshev simulation polynomial

Example

For real τ, truncate the Jacobi–Anger expansion at degree d=2. The resulting complex polynomial is P2(x)=J0(τ)−2J2(τ)T2(x)−2iJ1(τ)T1(x)=J0(τ)−2J2(τ)(2x2−1)−2iJ1(τ)x. Its real part is even and its imaginary part is odd. Its uniform remainder is bounded by 2∑k>2∣Jk(τ)∣, and by the displayed factorial bound of Jacobi–Anger Chebyshev truncation when ∣τ∣/8<1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Bessel series, Chebyshev recurrence, and real parameter τ of Hamiltonian-simulation polynomial target.

[F1]

Hamiltonian-simulation polynomial target: Jk(τ)=∑j≥0(−1)j(τ/2)2j+k/(j!(j+k)!), T0(x)=1, T1(x)=x, and Tk+1=2xTk−Tk−1 for k≥1.

[F2]

Jacobi–Anger Chebyshev truncation: truncating at degree d has error at most 2∑k>d∣Jk(τ)∣, with the factorial bound when its ratio condition holds.

Proof

Given: As in Facts & Assumptions.

1.1F1givenalgebra

The recurrence gives T2(x)=2xT1(x)−T0(x)=2x2−1. The k=0 term of the Chebyshev expansion is J0; the k=1 coefficient is 2(−i)J1=−2iJ1; and the k=2 coefficient is 2(−i)2J2=−2J2. Therefore the degree-two truncation is exactly the displayed P2.

2.1F1F2step 1.1algebra

The series in [F1] is real for real τ, so J0,J1,J2 are real. Since T2 is even and T1 is odd, Re⁡P2=J0−2J2T2 is even and Im⁡P2=−2J1T1 is odd. Applying [F2] with d=2 gives the uniform tail 2∑k>2∣Jk(τ)∣; its factorial denominator condition is ∣τ∣/[2(2+2)]=∣τ∣/8<1.

3.1F1F2step 1.1algebra∎

At τ=0, the series gives J0(0)=1 and J1(0)=J2(0)=0, so P2(x)=1=e0. At x=±1, T1(x)=x and T2(x)=1, and the same tail bound from [F2] applies without an endpoint exception.

Sources