Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The quasiprimitive Serre element in type A2

Statement

In the Drinfeld–Jimbo algebra of type A2 (the Cartan datum I={1,2}, A=(2−1−12), d1=d2=1, so q1=q2=q) the Serre elements

Serre12+=E12E2−[2]qE1E2E1+E2E12,Serre12−=F12F2−[2]qF1F2F1+F2F12,[2]q=q+q−1,

are quasiprimitive with explicit grouplike factors:

Δ(Serre12+)=Serre12+⊗K1−2K2−1+1⊗Serre12+,Δ(Serre12−)=Serre12−⊗1+K12K2⊗Serre12−.

In particular every mixed bidegree term cancels. The polynomial positive Serre expression at q=1 is the classical Serre bracket [e1,[e1,e2]]=0 of type A2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Cartan matrix has a12=a21=−1 and symmetrizer d1=d2=1, so q1=q2=q and the toral actions are those in Symmetrizable Cartan data for quantum groups and The Drinfeld-Jimbo quantized enveloping algebra by generators and relations. The Drinfeld–Jimbo definition supplies the two Serre words; the coproduct/Serre lemma supplies the positive and negative toral-action Borel maps, and their images give the formulas in the Drinfeld–Jimbo quotient. Tensor-product multiplication is as stated in The coproduct preserves the positive and negative quantum Serre ideals and The tensor product of R-algebras has multiplication (a⊗b)(a′⊗b′)=aa′⊗bb′.

[F2]

If yx=qi2xy, then (x+y)N=∑r=0Nqir(N−r)(Nr)ixryN−r (The quantum binomial expansion for q-commuting elements).

[F3]

The normalized positive coproduct assignment is an algebra map on the toral-action Borel (The coproduct preserves the positive and negative quantum Serre ideals).

[F4]

For every i≠j, the normalized negative coproduct formula is Δ−(Serreij−)=Serreij−⊗1+KimijKj⊗Serreij− (The coproduct preserves the positive and negative quantum Serre ideals).

[F5]

In the classical Kac–Moody algebra, the Serre presentation imposes (ad⁡ei)1−aijej=0 (Serre presentation of a kac moody algebra).

[F6]

Tensor-product multiplication is (a⊗b)(c⊗d)=ac⊗bd (The tensor product of R-algebras has multiplication (a⊗b)(a′⊗b′)=aa′⊗bb′).

[F7]

The toral action is KhEiKh−1=q⟨αi,h⟩Ei (The Drinfeld-Jimbo quantized enveloping algebra by generators and relations).

[F8]

The quantum Cartan datum fixes qi=qdi, so d1=d2=1 gives q1=q2=q (Symmetrizable Cartan data for quantum groups).

[F9]

The positive and negative Serre words are the sums in the Drinfeld–Jimbo presentation (The Drinfeld-Jimbo quantized enveloping algebra by generators and relations).

Proof

technique · Expand the positive three-letter words by choosing, at each position, a left coproduct term or a right coproduct term, and collect the six mixed tensor words
1.1F3F6F7F8algebra

The toral rules give K1E1K1−1=q2E1, K1E2K1−1=q−1E2, K2E1K2−1=q−1E1, and K2E2K2−1=q2E2. For xi=Ei⊗Ki−1 and yi=1⊗Ei, these imply yixi=q2xiyi.

1.2F4given

Here m12=2, so [F4] gives Δ(Serre12−)=Serre12−⊗1+K12K2⊗Serre12−; thus the negative expansion has no mixed bidegree terms either.

2.1step 1.1F2F3F6algebra

Applying [F2] at N=2 gives Δ(Ei)2=Ei2⊗Ki−2+(1+q2)Ei⊗Ki−1Ei+1⊗Ei2.

3.1F1F3F6F7F9step 2.1algebra

To collect the positive expansion, for each original word choose L for a position sent to Ei⊗Ki−1 and R for one sent to 1⊗Ei. The left word preserves the L letters; the right word preserves the R letters, followed by the K−1 factors from L. Moving a Ki−1 across a later Ej contributes q−aij. In bidegree (2,1) the coefficients of E1E2⊗E1K1−1K2−1, E12⊗E2K1−2, and E2E1⊗E1K1−1K2−1 are respectively 1+q−2−[2]qq−1, q2−[2]qq+1, and −[2]q+q+q−1.

3.2F1F3F6F7F9step 1.1step 2.1algebra

In bidegree (1,2) the coefficients of E1⊗E1E2K1−1, E2⊗E12K2−1, and E1⊗E2E1K1−1 are respectively q−1+q−[2]q, 1−[2]qq+q2, and −[2]qq−1+q−2+1. These six coefficient groups exhaust the non-extreme splits of the three-letter Serre words.

4.1F1step 3.1step 3.2F6algebra

Substituting [2]q=q+q−1 makes all six coefficients in steps 3.1–3.2 zero. The all-left and all-right choices contribute exactly Serre12+⊗K1−2K2−1 and 1⊗Serre12+, proving the positive formula.

5.1F5algebra∎

At q=1, the positive Serre polynomial becomes e12e2−2e1e2e1+e2e12=[e1,[e1,e2]], which vanishes by the classical type-A2 Serre relation [F5]. This is the specialization of the polynomial Serre expression only; it does not assert specialization of the whole algebra over Q(q).

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources