Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The double-edge Serre relation for the cyclic affine type A1(1)

Statement

For the double edge a12=a21=−2 (the Cartan matrix (2−2−22) of the cyclic affine type A1(1), with d1=d2=1) the quantum Serre relation has m=1−a12=3:

Serre12+=E13E2−[3]qE12E2E1+[3]qE1E2E12−E2E13,[3]q=q2+1+q−2,

and it is quasiprimitive:

Δ(Serre12+)=Serre12+⊗K1−3K2−1+1⊗Serre12+,Δ(Serre12−)=Serre12−⊗1+K13K2⊗Serre12−.

The Gaussian coefficients satisfy ∑r=03(−1)rq2r(3r)q=0. The polynomial positive Serre expression at q=1 is the classical cubic relation ad⁡(e1)3e2=0 for this Cartan matrix.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The matrix has a12=a21=−2, symmetrizer d1=d2=1, and the Drinfeld–Jimbo positive and negative Serre words use m=3. The prescribed coproduct on the positive and negative toral-action Borels is as in The coproduct preserves the positive and negative quantum Serre ideals.

[F1]

qi=qdi, so q1=q2=q (Symmetrizable Cartan data for quantum groups).

[F3]

If yx=qi2xy, then (x+y)N=∑r=0Nqir(N−r)(Nr)ixryN−r (The quantum binomial expansion for q-commuting elements).

[F4]

∑r=03(−1)rq2r(3r)q=0 (The quantum Pascal recurrences, the Gauss product formula and Gaussian integrality).

[F5]

The normalized positive coproduct is an algebra map on the toral-action Borel (The coproduct preserves the positive and negative quantum Serre ideals).

[F6]

The normalized negative formula is Δ−(Serreij−)=Serreij−⊗1+KimijKj⊗Serreij− (The coproduct preserves the positive and negative quantum Serre ideals).

[F7]

The toral action is KhEiKh−1=q⟨αi,h⟩Ei (The Drinfeld-Jimbo quantized enveloping algebra by generators and relations).

[F8]

The classical Kac–Moody presentation imposes (ad⁡ei)1−aijej=0 (Serre presentation of a kac moody algebra).

[F9]

Tensor-product multiplication is (a⊗b)(c⊗d)=ac⊗bd (The tensor product of R-algebras has multiplication (a⊗b)(a′⊗b′)=aa′⊗bb′).

[F10]

The positive and negative Serre words have Gaussian coefficients and powers 1−aij (The Drinfeld-Jimbo quantized enveloping algebra by generators and relations).

Proof

technique · Use the q-binomial expansion for $\Delta(E_1)^3$, enumerate left/right choices in each four-letter Serre word, and collect the twelve mixed tensor words by bidegree
1.1F1F5F7F9algebra

For i,j∈{1,2} the toral relations give KiEiKi−1=q2Ei and KiEjKi−1=q−2Ej when i≠j. For x1=E1⊗K1−1 and y1=1⊗E1, this gives y1x1=q2x1y1.

1.2F6given

Since m12=3, [F6] gives Δ(Serre12−)=Serre12−⊗1+K13K2⊗Serre12−, so the negative expansion also has no mixed bidegree terms.

2.1step 1.1F1F3F5F9algebra

Applying [F3] at N=3 gives Δ(E1)3=E13⊗K1−3+(1+q2+q4)E12⊗K1−2E1+(1+q2+q4)E1⊗K1−1E12+1⊗E13.

3.1F2F5F7F9F10step 2.1algebra

For each position of a positive Serre word, choose L for Ei⊗Ki−1 or R for 1⊗Ei. The left word preserves the L letters and the right word preserves the R letters, followed by the toral factors from L. Moving Ki−1 past a later Ej contributes q−2 when i=j and q2 when i≠j. In bidegree (3,1) the coefficients, for E13⊗E2K1−3, E12E2⊗E1K1−2K2−1, E1E2E1⊗E1K1−2K2−1, and E2E12⊗E1K1−2K2−1, are respectively q6−[3]qq4+[3]qq2−1, 1+q−2+q−4−[3]qq−2, −[3]q(1+q−2)+[3]q(1+q−2), and [3]q−(q2+1+q−2).

3.2F2F5F7F9F10step 2.1algebra

In bidegree (2,2) the coefficients, for E12⊗E1E2K1−2, E12⊗E2E1K1−2, E1E2⊗E12K1−1K2−1, and E2E1⊗E12K1−1K2−1, are respectively q4+q2+1−[3]q(q2+1)+[3]q, −[3]q+[3]q(1+q−2)−(1+q−2+q−4), 1+q−2+q−4−[3]q(1+q−2)+[3]q, and −[3]q+[3]q(q2+1)−(q4+q2+1).

3.3F2F5F7F9F10step 2.1algebra

In bidegree (1,3) the coefficients, for E1⊗E12E2K1−1, E1⊗E1E2E1K1−1, E1⊗E2E12K1−1, and E2⊗E13K2−1, are respectively [3]q−[3]q, −[3]q(1+q−2)+[3]q(1+q−2), [3]qq−2−(1+q−2+q−4), and 1−[3]qq2+[3]qq4−q6. These are all remaining mixed bidegrees.

4.1F2F4F10step 3.1step 3.2step 3.3F9algebra

Substituting [3]q=q2+1+q−2 makes all twelve mixed coefficients in steps 3.1–3.3 zero; the last coefficient in step 3.3 is the alternating Gaussian identity [F4]. The all-left and all-right choices give exactly Serre12+⊗K1−3K2−1 and 1⊗Serre12+. Thus the positive element is quasiprimitive.

5.1F8algebra∎

At q=1, [3]q=3 and the positive Serre polynomial becomes e13e2−3e12e2e1+3e1e2e12−e2e13=ad⁡(e1)3e2, which vanishes by [F8]. This specializes the polynomial Serre expression only, not the entire Q(q)-algebra.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

28 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources