Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Random-mapping representation for a finite transition matrix

Statement

Assume Choice. Let S be finite and ordered and let p be a transition matrix. There is a measurable F:S×[0,1]S such that, for uniform U, F(x,U) has law p(x,). If X0 is an S-valued random element and U1,U2, are fresh IID uniforms, independent of X0, then Xn+1=F(Xn,Un+1) is the p-chain.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Choice, the finite ordered state space, transition matrix, and, for the chain assertion, the S-valued random element and fresh uniforms in the statement.

[F1]

Disjoint blocks of an independent family generate independent sigma-algebras. (Disjoint groups of an independent sigma-algebra family remain independent)

[F2]

The bounded-function conditional identity characterizes a Markov chain. (Bounded-function form of the Markov property)

Verification

1.1

Suppose first that S={s1,,sd} with d1. For each row put [given] c0(x)=0,cj(x)=k=1jp(x,sk),1jd. Then cd(x)=1. Define F(x,u)=sjwhen{cj1(x)u<cj(x),j<d,cd1(x)u1,j=d. These intervals partition [0,1] with a fixed endpoint convention, even when some row entries vanish. Since S is finite, every inverse image is a finite union of measurable slices, so F is measurable.

given
2.1

Uniform interval lengths give [step 1.1] P(F(x,U)=sj)=cj(x)cj1(x)=p(x,sj). The possible singleton endpoint at 1 has probability zero, so the last closed endpoint does not change this calculation. It covers row probabilities zero and one and the one-state case d=1.

step 1.1
3.1

Let Hn=σ(X0,U1,,Un); then Xn is [F1, F2, step 1.1, step 2.1] Hn-measurable and [F1] makes Un+1 independent of Hn. For each sj, 1{F(Xn,Un+1)=sj}=i=1d1{Xn=si}1{Un+1Iij}, where Iij is the row interval from step 1.1. Conditioning term by term and using step 2.1 gives p(Xn,sj). Summing over sjA proves the transition identity for every AS, hence [F2] gives the p-chain. Empty/full A and time zero are included. Choice is used only for conditional expectations and, if a canonical realization is requested, by its path-law supplier.

F1F2step 1.1step 2.1
4.1

Together with steps 1.1--3.1, consider S=: the unique map [given, step 1.1, step 2.1, step 3.1] ×[0,1] satisfies the row-law assertion vacuously, but no probability initial law—and hence no chain—exists on S.

givenstep 1.1step 2.1step 3.1

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources