How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Random-mapping representation for a finite transition matrix
Statement
Assume Choice. Let be finite and ordered and let be a transition matrix. There is a measurable such that, for uniform , has law . If is an -valued random element and are fresh IID uniforms, independent of , then is the -chain.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Choice, the finite ordered state space, transition matrix, and, for the chain assertion, the -valued random element and fresh uniforms in the statement.
Disjoint blocks of an independent family generate independent sigma-algebras. (Disjoint groups of an independent sigma-algebra family remain independent)
The bounded-function conditional identity characterizes a Markov chain. (Bounded-function form of the Markov property)
Verification
Suppose first that with . For each row put [given] Then . Define These intervals partition with a fixed endpoint convention, even when some row entries vanish. Since is finite, every inverse image is a finite union of measurable slices, so is measurable.
Uniform interval lengths give [step 1.1] The possible singleton endpoint at has probability zero, so the last closed endpoint does not change this calculation. It covers row probabilities zero and one and the one-state case .
Let ; then is [F1, F2, step 1.1, step 2.1] -measurable and [F1] makes independent of . For each , where is the row interval from step 1.1. Conditioning term by term and using step 2.1 gives . Summing over proves the transition identity for every , hence [F2] gives the -chain. Empty/full and time zero are included. Choice is used only for conditional expectations and, if a canonical realization is requested, by its path-law supplier.
Together with steps 1.1--3.1, consider : the unique map [given, step 1.1, step 2.1, step 3.1] satisfies the row-law assertion vacuously, but no probability initial law—and hence no chain—exists on .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Levin, Peres, Wilmer, Markov Chains and Mixing Times, Section 1.2 (standard reference, not scraped)