How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The reentrant sector singularity has an explicit Sobolev threshold
Example
Assume Countable Choice. Let , let be the reentrant sector, let , and let . Then in , vanishes on the two radial edges and , and for every integer in particular and each additional whole derivative beyond is unavailable exactly by the deficit . For noninteger with integer and , define the intrinsic Slobodeckij scale here by requiring and finite seminorm for each weak derivative with . With this convention, for every real , . The integer threshold follows from polar-coordinate integrals; the fractional threshold follows from a dyadic-shell estimate and a matching scaled-pair lower bound.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , the sector above, , and .
A class in is a local weak solution of on if for every . (Local weak solutions of a divergence-form operator)
For every function on the punctured plane, the chain rule gives in polar coordinates; in particular on the sector. (The chain rule for total derivatives: , Weak derivative of a locally integrable function)
Polar integration on the sector is . (Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma)
A class lies in for an integer exactly when all its weak partial derivatives of order lie in ; the weak derivatives of the smooth function on are the classical ones, and on the sector the classical derivatives are bounded by constant multiples of . Along each fixed ray , the radial derivative satisfies ; since , if all Cartesian derivatives of order lie in , then this radial derivative also lies in . (Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms, Weak derivative of a locally integrable function)
The reentrant sector is a bounded Lipschitz domain that fails the boundary-chart condition at its vertex, and is a local weak solution of on it with . (Boundary regularity needs domain regularity)
Let on this sector, where and is smooth on . For , the intrinsic seminorm is finite if . To see this, put and . The angular formula extends smoothly to a slightly larger interval because , so near pairs in comparable shells satisfy ; integrating such pairs gives . Separated pairs in comparable shells give the same bound from and . For noncomparable shells with , ; integrating the two terms and in and summing over gives at most , with the inner sum geometric since . The final sum over converges exactly when .
For , choose two small disjoint balls compactly contained in , centered at the same radius and at angles and . Their gradient values differ because the direction-angle difference is ; shrinking the balls gives on . By homogeneity , the order- seminorm integral over is at least . These product sets are pairwise disjoint as varies, so their sum diverges for .
Verification
Harmonicity and edge vanishing. By [F2] the polar Laplacian of is , so is harmonic and on ; and shows that vanishes on both radial edges.
Membership below the threshold. Since for the classical derivatives by [F4], [F3] gives , which is finite whenever , that is . Hence every weak derivative of order lies in whenever the integer satisfies , and then by [F4].
Non-membership at and above the threshold. Let be an integer, so because , and put . Differentiating along a fixed ray gives . Since and , [F3] gives By [F4], membership in would force this radial derivative to lie in , so .
The integer threshold. Steps 1.2 and 1.3 give, for every integer ,
The stated particular cases. For the criterion gives because , so ; for it gives , which fails because and ; hence . These conclusions agree with the local weak-solution statement of [F5], which records the same function as the reentrant-corner witness and with [F1]'s definition of a local weak solution.
Fractional membership below the threshold. Let be noninteger with or and . If , then by step 1.2 and [F6] applies with , giving finite seminorm since . If , then and each component of has the form in [F6] with degree ; its seminorm is finite when , exactly when .
Fractional nonmembership and all higher orders. For , put . By [F7], has infinite order- seminorm, so the defining condition for fails. For , membership in the defined real-order scale entails membership in , which step 2.2 rules out; is covered by . Together with step 2.3 and the integer criterion of step 2.1, this proves exactly when .
Scope note
The real-order statement uses the intrinsic Slobodeckij convention specified in the statement; this fixes the fractional scale on the reentrant sector and does not rely on an unstated extension or boundary regularity theorem.
Source notes
Teschl's Example 10.1 (printed p. 242) is the source for the harmonic model function and the failure of in a reentrant sector. The quantitative threshold for integer orders follows from the explicit derivative bounds, the polar integral, and the directional-derivative bound in [F4].
Depends on
- Boundary $H^2$ regularity needs domain regularity
- Local weak solutions of a divergence-form operator
- Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms
- Weak derivative of a locally integrable function
- Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma
- The chain rule for total derivatives: $D(g\circ f)(a)=Dg(f(a))\circ Df(a)$
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
43 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Gerald Teschl, Partial Differential Equations: From Classical to Modern (2025 archived author manuscript, complete 392 pages) (standard reference, not scraped)