Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The reentrant sector singularity has an explicit Sobolev threshold

Example

Assume Countable Choice. Let π<ω<2π, let Sω={(rcos⁡θ,rsin⁡θ):0<r<1, 0<θ<ω} be the reentrant sector, let α=π/ω∈(0,1), and let u(r,θ)=rαsin⁡(αθ). Then Δu=0 in Sω, u vanishes on the two radial edges θ=0 and θ=ω, and for every integer m≥0 u∈Hm(Sω)  ⟺  m<1+α=1+πω; in particular u∈H1(Sω)∖H2(Sω) and each additional whole derivative beyond H1 is unavailable exactly by the deficit 1−π/ω. For noninteger s=m+t with integer m≥0 and 0<t<1, define the intrinsic Slobodeckij scale here by requiring u∈Hm(Sω) and finite seminorm ∫Sω∫Sω∣Dβu(x)−Dβu(y)∣2∣x−y∣2+2t dx dy for each weak derivative with ∣β∣=m. With this convention, for every real s≥0, u∈Hs(Sω)  ⟺  s<1+α=1+πω. The integer threshold follows from polar-coordinate integrals; the fractional threshold follows from a dyadic-shell estimate and a matching scaled-pair lower bound.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ω∈(π,2π), the sector Sω above, α=π/ω∈(0,1), and u(r,θ)=rαsin⁡(αθ).

[F1]

A class in H1(Sω) is a local weak solution of −Δu=0 on Sω if ∫Sω∇u⋅∇v‾ dx=0 for every v∈Cc∞(Sω). (Local weak solutions of a divergence-form operator)

[F2]

For every C2 function w on the punctured plane, the chain rule gives Δw=wrr+r−1wr+r−2wθθ in polar coordinates; in particular Δ(rαsin⁡(αθ))=0 on the sector. (The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘Df(a), Weak derivative of a locally integrable function)

[F3]

Polar integration on the sector is ∫Sωf dx=∫0ω∫01f(rcos⁡θ,rsin⁡θ) r dr dθ. (Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma)

[F4]

A class u lies in Hm(Sω) for an integer m≥0 exactly when all its weak partial derivatives of order ≤m lie in L2(Sω); the weak derivatives of the smooth function u on Sω∖{0} are the classical ones, and on the sector r>0 the classical derivatives Dju are bounded by constant multiples of rα−j. Along each fixed ray x=rer, the radial derivative satisfies ∂rmu(r,θ)=Dmu(rer)[er,…,er]; since ∣er∣=1, if all Cartesian derivatives of order m lie in L2, then this radial derivative also lies in L2. (Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms, Weak derivative of a locally integrable function)

[F5]

The reentrant sector is a bounded Lipschitz domain that fails the C1 boundary-chart condition at its vertex, and u is a local weak solution of −Δu=0 on it with u∈H1(Sω)∖H2(Sω). (Boundary H2 regularity needs domain regularity)

[F6]

Let w(r,θ)=rγΨ(θ) on this sector, where γ>−1 and Ψ is smooth on [0,ω]. For 0<t<1, the intrinsic seminorm ∫Sω∫Sω∣w(x)−w(y)∣2∣x−y∣2+2t dx dy is finite if t<γ+1. To see this, put Aj={2−j−1<r<2−j,0<θ<ω} and λj=2−j. The angular formula extends smoothly to a slightly larger interval because ω<2π, so near pairs in comparable shells satisfy ∣w(x)−w(y)∣≤Cλjγ−1∣x−y∣; integrating such pairs gives Cλj2γ+2−2t. Separated pairs in comparable shells give the same bound from ∣w∣≤Cλjγ and ∣x−y∣≥cλj. For noncomparable shells Aj,Ak with k≥j+2, ∣x−y∣≥cλj; integrating the two terms λj2γ and λk2γ in ∣w(x)−w(y)∣2 and summing over k gives at most Cλj2γ+2−2t, with the inner sum geometric since γ>−1. The final sum over j converges exactly when t<γ+1.

[F7]

For Du=∇u=αrα−1(sin⁡((α−1)θ),cos⁡((α−1)θ)), choose two small disjoint balls A,B compactly contained in {1/2<r<1, 0<θ<ω}, centered at the same radius and at angles ω/4 and 3ω/4. Their gradient values differ because the direction-angle difference is (α−1)ω/2=(π−ω)/2≠0; shrinking the balls gives ∣Du(x)−Du(y)∣≥c>0 on A×B. By homogeneity Du(λx)=λα−1Du(x), the order-t seminorm integral over 2−jA×2−jB is at least c′2−j(2α−2t). These product sets are pairwise disjoint as j varies, so their sum diverges for t≥α.

Verification

1.1F2algebragiven

Harmonicity and edge vanishing. By [F2] the polar Laplacian of w=rαsin⁡(αθ) is (α(α−1)+α−α2)rα−2sin⁡(αθ)=0, so u is harmonic and C∞ on Sω; and sin⁡(α⋅0)=sin⁡(π)=0=sin⁡(αω) shows that u vanishes on both radial edges.

1.2F3F4algebra

Membership below the threshold. Since ∣Dju(r,θ)∣≤Cjrα−j for the classical derivatives by [F4], [F3] gives ∫Sω∣Dju∣2dx≤Cj2∫0ω∫01r2α−2jr dr dθ=Cj′ ⁣∫01r2α−2j+1dr, which is finite whenever 2α−2j+1>−1, that is j<α+1. Hence every weak derivative of order j≤m lies in L2(Sω) whenever the integer m satisfies m<1+α, and then u∈Hm(Sω) by [F4].

1.3F3F4algebra

Non-membership at and above the threshold. Let m≥α+1 be an integer, so m≥1 because α<1, and put cm:=α(α−1)⋯(α−m+1)≠0. Differentiating along a fixed ray gives ∂rmu=cmrα−msin⁡(αθ). Since 2α−2m+1≤−1 and ∫0ωsin⁡2(αθ) dθ>0, [F3] gives ∫Sω∣∂rmu∣2 dx=cm2(∫0ωsin⁡2(αθ) dθ)(∫01r2α−2m+1 dr)=+∞. By [F4], membership in Hm would force this radial derivative to lie in L2, so u∉Hm(Sω).

2.1step 1.2step 1.3

The integer threshold. Steps 1.2 and 1.3 give, for every integer m≥0, u∈Hm(Sω)  ⟺  m<1+α.

2.2F1F5step 1.2algebra

The stated particular cases. For m=1 the criterion gives 1<1+α because α>0, so u∈H1(Sω); for m=2 it gives 2<1+α, which fails because α<1 and ω>π; hence u∉H2(Sω). These conclusions agree with the local weak-solution statement of [F5], which records the same function as the reentrant-corner witness and with [F1]'s definition of a local weak solution.

2.3F6step 1.2algebra

Fractional membership below the threshold. Let s=m+t be noninteger with m=0 or m=1 and 0<t<1. If m=0, then u∈L2 by step 1.2 and [F6] applies with γ=α, giving finite Ht seminorm since t<1<1+α. If m=1, then u∈H1 and each component of Du has the form in [F6] with degree γ=α−1; its Ht seminorm is finite when t<γ+1=α, exactly when s=1+t<1+α.

3.1F7step 2.1step 2.2algebra∎

Fractional nonmembership and all higher orders. For 1+α≤s<2, put t=s−1≥α. By [F7], Du has infinite order-t seminorm, so the defining condition for Hs fails. For s≥2, membership in the defined real-order scale entails membership in H2(Sω), which step 2.2 rules out; s=0 is covered by u∈L2. Together with step 2.3 and the integer criterion of step 2.1, this proves u∈Hs(Sω) exactly when s<1+α.

Scope note

The real-order statement uses the intrinsic Slobodeckij convention specified in the statement; this fixes the fractional scale on the reentrant sector and does not rely on an unstated extension or boundary regularity theorem.

Source notes

Teschl's Example 10.1 (printed p. 242) is the source for the harmonic model function and the failure of H2 in a reentrant sector. The quantitative threshold for integer orders follows from the explicit rα−j derivative bounds, the polar integral, and the directional-derivative bound in [F4].

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

43 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources