Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Sample variance from a multivariate delta method

Example

Assume AC. Let X1,X2,… be iid real random variables with E∣X1∣4<∞. Put μj=E[X1j] for 1≤j≤4, σ2=μ2−μ12, Xˉn=n−1∑iXi, Qn=n−1∑iXi2, and Sn2=Qn−Xˉn2. Then n(Sn2−σ2)⇒N1(0,τ2),τ2=Var⁡((X1−μ1)2)=E[(X1−μ1)4]−σ4=μ4−4μ1μ3+8μ12μ2−4μ14−μ22. Here σ4=(σ2)2 and τ2=Var⁡((X1−μ1)2).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, iid real observations, and the finite fourth absolute moment.

[A1]

AC is assumed so the library's multivariate iid central limit theorem and multivariate normal law apply.

[A2]

E∣X1∣4<∞.

[F1]

Identical distribution and IID families: iid means a common law and mutual independence of the whole family.

[F2]

Measurable coordinatewise functions preserve independence: measurable coordinatewise maps of an independent family remain independent.

[F3]

Multivariate iid central limit theorem: iid finite-dimensional vectors with finite second moment have a centered Gaussian weak limit with their covariance, under AC.

[F4]

Multivariate normal law, including singular covariance: every scalar projection of a centered multivariate normal law is normal with the projected covariance.

[F5]

First- and second-order delta method for random vectors: a first-order expansion of a map at the target transfers a vector weak limit through its derivative.

[F6]

The Axiom of Choice: AC states that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function.

[F7]

Moments, variance, and covariance on a probability space: for square-integrable W, Var⁡(W)=E[(W−EW)2]; covariance is defined by the corresponding centered product.

Verification

Given: The data, moments, sample variance, and assumptions in the example.

1.1A1A2F1F2F3F6

Let Yi=(Xi,Xi2). The map x↦(x,x2) is Borel, so [F1]–[F2] show that (Yi) is iid. By [A2], E∥Y1∥2=μ2+μ4<∞, with mean (μ1,μ2) and covariance C=(μ2−μ12μ3−μ1μ2μ3−μ1μ2μ4−μ22). By [A1] and [F3], n{(Xˉn,Qn)−(μ1,μ2)}⇒Z∼N2(0,C).

2.1F5step 1.1givenalgebra

The map g(x,y)=y−x2 has g(μ1,μ2)=σ2 and derivative (u,v)↦−2μ1u+v. Apply [F5] to step 1.1 to get n(Sn2−σ2)⇒−2μ1Z1+Z2.

3.1F4F7step 1.1step 2.1givenalgebra∎

By [F4], the limit is centered normal with variance (−2μ1,1)C(−2μ1,1)T=4μ12(μ2−μ12)−4μ1(μ3−μ1μ2)+μ4−μ22=μ4−4μ1μ3+8μ12μ2−4μ14−μ22. Expanding E[(X1−μ1)4]−(μ2−μ12)2 gives the same expression. By [F7], it is Var⁡((X1−μ1)2), so the displayed τ2 is exactly the limit variance.

Remarks

The cited Duchi sample-variance example supplies the setup and covariance matrix, but its printed final variance μ4−μ22 omits the nonzero-mean terms. Step 3.1 derives the corrected variance directly; the printed expression agrees with it when μ1=0.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

32 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources