How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Multivariate iid central limit theorem
Statement
Assume AC and let be a finite integer. Let be iid -valued random vectors with , mean m and covariance Sigma. Then The covariance may be singular.
Facts & Assumptions
The scalar iid CLT applies in each positive-variance projection. Lindeberg-Levy iid central limit theorem.
The Gaussian target with a positive semidefinite covariance exists, including singular covariance. Multivariate normal law, including singular covariance.
Convergence of every projection to those of a specified Borel probability implies vector weak convergence. Cramer wold device.
A nonnegative measurable function of integral zero vanishes almost everywhere. A nonnegative measurable function has integral exactly when it vanishes almost everywhere.
Finite means and covariance expansions obey linearity. The Lebesgue integral is linear on .
The Euclidean Cauchy–Schwarz inequality bounds a projection by the vector norm. Cauchy-Schwarz with its equality case, the triangle inequality for , the parallelogram law and polarisation.
Continuous scalar scaling preserves convergence in distribution. Continuous mapping theorem.
Proof
Given: Assume AC and let be a finite integer. Let be iid -valued random vectors with , mean m and covariance Sigma. Then The covariance may be singular.
For each fixed set . These are iid: inverse images under the continuous projection preserve the finite independence identities and the common law. By [F6], ; the latter is integrable since . Each centered coordinate product is integrable by , and symmetry of these products gives . Finite linearity gives and . Because this holds for every , the symmetric matrix is positive semidefinite. Consequently [F2] supplies the target law .
If v>0, [F1] gives . Scaling by is continuous; [F7] gives , which is the u-projection of G by [F2]. If v=0, [F4] applied to gives almost surely for each k. For each fixed n the union of the finitely many exceptional null sets is null, so the projected row sum is zero almost surely and has exactly the law N(0,0). Thus the same projection convergence holds without dividing by v.
The preceding convergence holds for every fixed u to the projections of the same specified probability G. [F3] therefore proves the vector conclusion. AC is inherited in the scalar CLT, Gaussian construction and Cramer–Wold theorem. A common null set across all u is neither claimed nor needed. When Sigma=0 all projections are in the zero-variance case. For d=1 this agrees with the scalar result after scaling.
Depends on
- Lindeberg-Levy iid central limit theorem
- Multivariate normal law, including singular covariance
- Cramer wold device
- A nonnegative measurable function has integral $0$ exactly when it vanishes almost everywhere
- The Lebesgue integral is linear on $L^1(\mu)$
- Cauchy-Schwarz $\lvert\langle x,y\rangle\rvert \le \lVert x\rVert_2\lVert y\rVert_2$ with its equality case, the triangle inequality for $\lVert\cdot\rVert_2$, the parallelogram law and polarisation
- Continuous mapping theorem
- Moments, variance, and covariance on a probability space
- Convergence in distribution of random elements
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
62 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Durrett, Probability: Theory and Examples, Theorem 3.10.7 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Aldous and Chewi, Probability Theory notes, Theorem 8.4 (standard reference, not scraped)