Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Multivariate iid central limit theorem

Statement

Assume AC and let d1 be a finite integer. Let (Xk)k1 be iid Rd-valued random vectors with EX12<, mean m and covariance Sigma. Then n1/2k=1n(Xkm)Nd(0,Σ). The covariance may be singular.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

The scalar iid CLT applies in each positive-variance projection. Lindeberg-Levy iid central limit theorem.

[F2]

The Gaussian target with a positive semidefinite covariance exists, including singular covariance. Multivariate normal law, including singular covariance.

[F3]

Convergence of every projection to those of a specified Borel probability implies vector weak convergence. Cramer wold device.

[F4]

A nonnegative measurable function of integral zero vanishes almost everywhere. A nonnegative measurable function has integral 0 exactly when it vanishes almost everywhere.

[F5]

Finite means and covariance expansions obey linearity. The Lebesgue integral is linear on L1(μ).

[F7]

Continuous scalar scaling preserves convergence in distribution. Continuous mapping theorem.

Proof

Given: Assume AC and let d1 be a finite integer. Let (Xk)k1 be iid Rd-valued random vectors with EX12<, mean m and covariance Sigma. Then n1/2k=1n(Xkm)Nd(0,Σ). The covariance may be singular.

1.1

For each fixed uRd set Yk=u(Xkm). These are iid: inverse images under the continuous projection preserve the finite independence identities and the common law. By [F6], Yk2u2Xkm2; the latter is integrable since Xkm22Xk2+2m2. Each centered coordinate product is integrable by 2aba2+b2, and symmetry of these products gives Σij=Σji. Finite linearity gives EYk=0 and EYk2=uTΣu=:v0. Because this holds for every u, the symmetric matrix Σ is positive semidefinite. Consequently [F2] supplies the target law G=Nd(0,Σ).

F2F5F6
2.1

If v>0, [F1] gives (nv)1/2k=1nYkN(0,1). Scaling by v is continuous; [F7] gives n1/2kYkN(0,v), which is the u-projection of G by [F2]. If v=0, [F4] applied to Yk2 gives Yk=0 almost surely for each k. For each fixed n the union of the finitely many exceptional null sets is null, so the projected row sum is zero almost surely and has exactly the law N(0,0). Thus the same projection convergence holds without dividing by v.

step 1.1F1F2F4F7
3.1

The preceding convergence holds for every fixed u to the projections of the same specified probability G. [F3] therefore proves the vector conclusion. AC is inherited in the scalar CLT, Gaussian construction and Cramer–Wold theorem. A common null set across all u is neither claimed nor needed. When Sigma=0 all projections are in the zero-variance case. For d=1 this agrees with the scalar result after scaling.

step 2.1F3

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

62 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources