How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A zero-gradient quadratic limit
Example
Let with probabilities , let , and set for . For at , the first derivative vanishes and the second derivative is . The second-order delta method gives , which equals or with probability each.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The finite three-point law and sequence in the example.
has full sigma-field and assigns probabilities respectively; .
First- and second-order delta method for random vectors: if is deterministic with , , the Borel map has zero first derivative at , and for a continuous symmetric bilinear map , then .
Verification
Given: The three-point law, , , and .
By [A1], has the stated three-point law. We have exactly and for every , so the first derivative is zero, the second derivative is , and the second-order remainder vanishes.
Apply [F1] to obtain . By [A1], at and at , so each value has probability .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.