How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Selecting an admissible contour height
Example
For , one can choose with distance at least from every zero ordinate in , for an absolute .
Verification
Given: the unit-interval zero count.
The three adjacent unit-interval bounds show that the number of relevant ordinates is at most after enlarging an absolute constant to cover . Around each such ordinate remove an interval of radius , where .
The total removed length inside is at most . Consequently some remains in that interval, and by construction its distance from every relevant ordinate is at least .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
2 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Kiran S. Kedlaya, Analytic Number Theory, §10.3 (standard reference, not scraped)