Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 3 results · all verified · 0 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full by a delegated reviewing agent on the owner's instruction; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 3 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Perron Inversion and the Explicit Formula — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

These calculations isolate the half-jump, the four residue families, and the ordering convention that a sharp zero sum requires. The global sharp and smoothed formula examples inherit countable choice from their supplying theorems.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

Perron's kernel at and away from its jump

Example

At c=1, the limiting kernels for y=1/2,1,2 are respectively 0,1/2,1.

Verification

Given: the symmetric and truncated Perron kernel formulas.

1.1givenalgebra

Substitute y=1/2,1,2 in the three branches of the symmetric kernel.

2.1step 1.1algebra∎

The truncated estimate has the separate 1/T branch only at y=1, exhibiting why the half value cannot be merged into either away-from-jump estimate.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedaudited 2026-09-07Open item page →

Perron inversion for a finite Dirichlet polynomial

Example

For F(s)=1+2−s, Perron's integral is 1 for 1<x<2, 3/2 for x=2, and 2 for x>2.

Verification

Given: the Perron formula for finite sums.

1.1givenalgebra

Termwise inversion gives δ(x)+δ(x/2); for x>1, the first term is 1.

2.1step 1.1cases∎

The second term is 0,1/2,1 according as x<2,x=2,x>2, proving all three values without a limit interchange.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-09-24 (gpt-6-sol)Open item page →

The von Mangoldt residue table

Example

Assume countable choice.

For x>1, the contour integrand has contributions x at 1, −xρ/ρ at a nontrivial zero, −12log⁡(1−x−2) from all negative even zeros, and −ζ′(0)/ζ(0) at 0.

Verification

Given: Countable choice, x>1 and the residue ledger.

1.1givenalgebra

The pole at 1 and each nontrivial zero have the listed local residues, with zero multiplicity multiplying the second entry.

2.1step 1.1algebra∎

Summing the geometric-logarithmic trivial family and retaining the independent pole of 1/s at 0 gives the remaining two entries.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-09-24 (gpt-6-sol)Open item page →

Smoothed versus sharp explicit formulas

Example

Assume countable choice.

The linear cutoff equals 1 through x and fades to 0 on (x,y), whereas the sharp formula evaluates ψ0(x) and gives half weight at a prime power.

Verification

Given: Countable choice and the smoothed and sharp formulas.

1.1givenalgebra

The two integrations by parts in the smoothed formula supply Mellin decay, hence a declared convergent zero sum.

2.1step 1.1algebra∎

The sharp formula instead has a finite ordinate sum and an error containing ⟨x⟩; at a jump its left hand side is explicitly half-weighted.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedverified 2026-09-26 (gpt-6-sol)Open item page →

Selecting an admissible contour height

Example

Assume countable choice. For T≥3, one can choose T′∈[T,T+1] with distance at least c/log⁡T from every zero ordinate in [T−1,T+2], for an absolute c>0.

Verification

Given: Countable choice and the O(log⁡(T+2)) unit-interval zero count.

1.1givenconstruct

The three adjacent unit-interval bounds show that the number of relevant ordinates is at most Clog⁡T after enlarging an absolute constant C to cover 3≤T≤5. Around each such ordinate remove an interval of radius c/log⁡T, where c<1/(2C).

2.1step 1.1discharge-construct∎

The total removed length inside [T,T+1] is at most 2Cc<1. Consequently some T′ remains in that interval, and by construction its distance from every relevant ordinate is at least c/log⁡T.

CounterexampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-09-24 (gpt-6-sol)Open item page →

An unordered infinite zero sum is not an explicit formula

Statement refuted

For x>1, the bare unordered expression ∑ρxρ/ρ is a defined quantity equal to the sharp explicit-formula zero contribution.

Counterexample

Given: Countable choice and the sharp and smoothed explicit formulas.

1.1givenalgebra

The sharp formula asserts only finite sums ∑∣ℑρ∣<T and specifies an error before any limit is taken.

2.1step 1.1contradiction∎

The smoothed formula supplies a different convergence mechanism through its Mellin decay. Neither result assigns a value to the displayed unordered bare sum, so the asserted equality has no defined left side.

CounterexampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

Right-continuous psi has the wrong Perron endpoint

Statement refuted

At every prime power q, the right-continuous ψ(q) equals the Perron endpoint value.

Counterexample

Given: q=pk and the definitions of ψ and ψ0.

1.1givenalgebra

The right-continuous sum includes the full last term: ψ(q)=∑n<qΛ(n)+log⁡p.

2.1step 1.1algebra∎

Perron's endpoint is ψ0(q)=∑n<qΛ(n)+12log⁡p, so the two values differ by 12log⁡p≠0.

Sources