Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A broken polynomial with a nonzero jump is not globally H1

Example

On the interval partition K−=(0,1/2), K+=(1/2,1), let v=1 on K− and v=0 on K+. This is a broken piecewise-constant polynomial with jump [v]=1 at the interior face. Its distributional derivative is a point mass, so v∉W1,2(0,1).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice; the interval partition; the piecewise-constant function above; and the weak-derivative definition of W1,2.

[F1]

A weak first derivative g∈L2(0,1) must satisfy ∫01vφ′=−∫01gφ for every φ∈Cc∞(0,1). (Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms)

[F2]

The interior scalar jump is the left trace minus the right trace. (Jump and average conventions for symmetric interior-penalty DG)

[F3]

The Sobolev-space definition assumes Countable Choice. (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω))

[F4]

The L2 case of Holder's inequality gives ∣∫fg∣≤∥f∥2∥g∥2. (Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases)

Verification

1.1F2F3givenalgebra

The traces at x=1/2 are v−=1 and v+=0, so [F2] gives [v]=1. For every smooth compactly supported φ, direct integration on the two intervals gives ∫01vφ′=∫01/2φ′=φ(1/2).

2.1F1F4step 1.1givenconstruct∎

If an L2 weak derivative g existed, [F1] would give φ(1/2)=−∫01gφ. Use the explicit bump η(t)=exp⁡(1−(1−4t2)−1) for ∣t∣<1/2 and η(t)=0 otherwise; it is smooth because the exponential is flat at the endpoints, is supported in [−1/2,1/2]⊂(−1,1), and satisfies η(0)=1. Let φε(x)=η((x−1/2)/ε) for 0<ε<1/2. Then φε∈Cc∞(0,1), φε(1/2)=1, and ∥φε∥L2=ε∥η∥L2(−1,1)→0. The integral Cauchy–Schwarz inequality [F4] forces ∣∫gφε∣≤∥g∥2∥φε∥2→0, contradicting step 1.1. Thus no such g exists and v∉W1,2(0,1).

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

28 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.