Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Sphere as a polygonal quotient

Example

The digon with boundary word a a−1 is a polygonal schema whose realization Y is homeomorphic to the unit sphere S2 of Euclidean spheres and closed balls as subspaces of Rn. It has two vertex classes, one edge class and one face, so V=2, E=1, F=1 and χ(S2)=2−1+1=2 (Euler characteristic of a finite CW complex), and it is orientable. This finite example uses no choice axiom.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The digon D, a closed disk whose boundary is divided by two corners v0,v1 into the sides s1 from v0 to v1, labelled a, and s2 from v1 to v0, labelled a−1, paired by the parameter reversal s1(t)∼s2(1−t), with realization Y=D/∼; and the unit sphere S2={(α,t)∈R2×R:∥α∥22+t2=1} with its closed upper hemisphere S+2={(α,1−∥α∥22):∥α∥2≤1}, its closed lower hemisphere S−2={(α,−1−∥α∥22):∥α∥2≤1}, and the common equator S+2∩S−2.

[L1]

Schema conventions: a polygonal schema is finite data of oriented nondegenerate closed disks whose sides are paired by homeomorphisms, its realization is the quotient by the generated relation, and its corner classes, paired side classes and disk interiors form a finite cell structure with counts (V,E,F); each disk is a closed bounded subset of the plane; a disk with exactly two sides is a bigon whose sides are simple arcs meeting exactly at the two corners; in a one-polygon word a pair with opposite exponents is orientation compatible, while equal exponents give a twisted pairing (Polygonal schemas and paired boundary edges).

[L3]

Cutting a polygon along an embedded polygonal diagonal whose interior lies in the polygon interior and regluing the two new boundary sides to each other preserves the quotient homeomorphism type (Homeomorphism-preserving polygonal schema moves).

[L5]

The Euler characteristic of a space with finitely many cells is χ(X)=∑n(−1)ncn(X) (Euler characteristic of a finite CW complex).

[L6]

An integral orientation is a continuous section of the local homology system whose value generates every fiber; the system is trivialized over coordinate balls, where a continuous generator section is locally constant, so a generator prescribed on the oriented face continues across an edge exactly when the pairing is orientation compatible (R-orientation of a topological manifold, Orientation local system and orientation cover).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1L1

The pairing is the parameter reversal s1(t)∼s2(1−t), so the corner v0=s1(0) is paired with s2(1)=v0 and the corner v1=s1(1) with s2(0)=v1: each corner forms its own vertex class, the two sides form one edge class, and the disk interior is the one face. Hence the realization Y has V=2, E=1, F=1, and these are the cells of its finite CW structure.

1.2L1L3

First replace the bigon by a round-disk representative. A disk homeomorphism takes its two corners to two points of the unit circle; a circle homeomorphism carrying these to antipodal points extends radially, ru↦rφ(u), with radial inverse. Composing gives a disk homeomorphism taking the two corners to opposite ends of a diameter. Conjugate the side pairing by this homeomorphism; it induces a quotient homeomorphism by [L2], using the inverse to obtain the inverse quotient map. We may now cut the round representative along that diameter γ, whose interior lies in the disk interior; the pieces are two bigons, B1 with sides s1 and one copy of γ, and B2 with sides s2 and the other copy γ′. By the split identity of [L3] the quotient Y is homeomorphic to the quotient of B1⊔B2 by the pair s1∼s2 together with the pair γ∼γ′; since ∂B1=s1∪γ and ∂B2=s2∪γ′ and the two pairings match at the common endpoints v0,v1, they combine into a single homeomorphism h:∂B1→∂B2 that identifies the whole boundary circle of B1 with the whole boundary circle of B2.

2.1L2L4step 1.2

Fix homeomorphisms α1:B1→B‾2(0,1) and u2:B2→B‾2(0,1) onto the closed unit disk, which exist because bigons are closed disks, and let φ=α1∘h−1∘u2−1 on the unit circle; extending φ radially by κ(tu)=t φ(u) and putting α2=κ∘u2 gives a homeomorphism α2:B2→B‾2(0,1) with α2∘h=α1 on ∂B1. Here κ−1(tu)=t φ−1(u) and α2−1=u2−1∘κ−1. Define Φ on the class of x∈B1 as (α1(x),1−∥α1(x)∥22) and on the class of x∈B2 as (α2(x),−1−∥α2(x)∥22): the two formulas agree on the glued boundary circle because α2∘h=α1 there, so Φ is a well-defined continuous map out of the quotient by [L2]. It is surjective onto S+2∪S−2=S2 and injective because the two formulas are homeomorphisms onto the closed upper and lower hemispheres, which meet exactly in the equator. The quotient is compact as a continuous image of the compact disk D [L2], while S2 is Hausdorff [L4], so Φ is a homeomorphism by the compact-to-Hausdorff criterion [L4], and Y≅S2.

3.1L1L6step 1.1step 2.1

The single pair has opposite exponents, so by [L1] it is orientation compatible; by step 2.1 the realization Y is a boundaryless surface, and the generator carried by the oriented face continues unchanged across the single edge class, its locally constant generator classes over face and vertex charts supplying a continuous generating section as in [L6]. Hence Y, and by step 2.1 the sphere S2, is orientable.

4.1L1L5step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1∎

The cell counts of step 1.1 give χ(Y)=V−E+F=2−1+1=2 by [L5], and this is the Euler characteristic of S2 by step 2.1. Every construction used is finite and explicit: one diameter splitting a round representative into two bigons, one radial extension of a circle homeomorphism, and two hemisphere formulas, so no choice axiom is used.

Remarks

The word a a−1 is the empty product of crosscap and handle blocks, the genus-zero case of the classification. The split move turns the digon into two bigons whose whole boundary circles are glued to each other, and gluing two disks along their boundaries is exactly the two-hemisphere model of S2. The argument uses only the finite split move and explicit disk-to-hemisphere homeomorphisms, and never the classification theorem or the Axiom of Choice.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

74 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources