How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Splitting the theta Mellin integral at isolates the two polar terms of completed zeta
Example
For the completed zeta function,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Mellin representation and the completed functional equation.
The completed-function theorem supplies the split formula displayed in the statement (The completed zeta function satisfies ).
Verification
Start from [L1] and split the integral at . The piece on is exactly where the theta transformation is used in the proof of the completed functional equation.
The resulting rewritten form is the symmetric identity recorded in [L2], so the two polar terms are isolated explicitly in the factor .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Elias M. Stein and Rami Shakarchi, Complex Analysis, Theorem 2.3 (standard reference, not scraped)