Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-09-24 (gpt-6-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The completed zeta function satisfies Λ(s)=Λ(1−s)

Statement

Assume countable choice.

The completed zeta function extends meromorphically to C, has simple poles at 0 and 1, and satisfies

Λ(s)=Λ(1−s).

More explicitly,

Λ(s)=1s(s−1)+12∫1∞(θ(t)−1)(ts/2−1+t−s/2−1/2) dt,

and the right-hand side is symmetric under s↦1−s.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable choice and the completed function on Re⁡s>1.

[A2]

Countable choice is The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω); it supplies the hypotheses of [L2] and [L4].

[L1]

The completed zeta function is Λ(s)=π−s/2Γ(s/2)ζ(s) (The completed zeta function Λ(s)=π−s/2Γ(s/2)ζ(s)).

[L2]

The theta transformation is θ(t)=t−1/2θ(1/t) (The Jacobi theta function satisfies θ(t)=t−1/2θ(1/t)).

[L3]

On Re⁡s>1, Λ(s)=12∫0∞(θ(t)−1)ts/2−1 dt (The completed zeta function has its Mellin-theta integral representation on Re⁡s>1).

[L4]

Under countable choice, the meromorphic continuation theorem constructs the entire function H(s)=12∫1∞(θ(t)−1)(ts/2−1+t−s/2−1/2) dt and gives Λ(s)=1/(s(s−1))+H(s) on C (The Riemann zeta function extends meromorphically to the complex plane with its only pole at 1, Proof 2.1).

[A1]

Two meromorphic functions on a connected domain that agree on a nonempty open subset agree everywhere on that domain.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenA2L2L3algebra

Under [A2], repeating the split-at-1 calculation from the Mellin integral in [L3] and using [L2] on (0,1) gives Λ(s)=1s(s−1)+12∫1∞(θ(t)−1)(ts/2−1+t−s/2−1/2) dt for Re⁡s>1.

1.2L4algebra

Define F(s):=1/(s(s−1))+H(s) on C, using the globally convergent integral for H in [L4]. For every s∈C, its two powers of t exchange under s↦1−s, and 1/(s(s−1))=1/((1−s)(−s)). Therefore F(s)=F(1−s) as meromorphic functions on C. This conclusion uses the global integral identity, not merely its initial validity on Re⁡s>1.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2L1L4A1algebra∎

On Re⁡s>1, [L1] names the completed function as Λ(s) and step 1.1 identifies it with F. By [L4] this is its meromorphic continuation, so [A1] identifies F with Λ on all of C. Step 1.2 now gives Λ(s)=F(s)=F(1−s)=Λ(1−s). Since H is entire, the nonzero simple principal parts of 1/(s(s−1)) give simple poles at 0 and 1.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources