Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-04
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The completed zeta function satisfies Λ(s)=Λ(1s)

Statement

The completed zeta function extends meromorphically to C, has simple poles at 0 and 1, and satisfies

Λ(s)=Λ(1s).

More explicitly,

Λ(s)=1s(s1)+121(θ(t)1)(ts/21+ts/21/2)dt,

and the right-hand side is symmetric under s1s.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The completed function on Res>1.

[L1]

The completed zeta function is Λ(s)=πs/2Γ(s/2)ζ(s) (The completed zeta function Λ(s)=πs/2Γ(s/2)ζ(s)).

[L2]

The theta transformation is θ(t)=t1/2θ(1/t) (The Jacobi theta function satisfies θ(t)=t1/2θ(1/t)).

[L3]

On Res>1, Λ(s)=120(θ(t)1)ts/21dt (The completed zeta function has its Mellin-theta integral representation on Res>1).

[L4]

The meromorphic continuation theorem yields an entire function H with Λ(s)=1s(s1)+H(s) on C (The Riemann zeta function extends meromorphically to the complex plane with its only pole at 1).

[A1]

Two meromorphic functions on a connected domain that agree on a nonempty open subset agree everywhere on that domain.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Repeating the split-at-1 calculation from the Mellin integral in [L3] and using [L2] on (0,1) gives Λ(s)=1s(s1)+121(θ(t)1)(ts/21+ts/21/2)dt for Res>1.

givenL2L3algebra
2.1

Define F(s):=1s(s1)+H(s), where H is the entire function from [L4]. By step 1.1, on Res>1 this equals the explicit right-hand side there. That explicit formula is unchanged when s is replaced by 1s, because 1/(s(s1))=1/((1s)(s)) and the two powers of t are exchanged. Hence F(s)=F(1s)(Res>1).

step 1.1L4algebra
3.1

On Res>1, [L1] names the completed function as Λ(s), and step 1.1 identifies that same function with the explicit split formula. Combined with [L4], this shows that F(s)=Λ(s) there. Since both F and Λ are meromorphic on C, [A1] gives F=Λ on all of C. Applying [A1] again to the meromorphic functions F(s) and F(1s), which agree on Res>1 by step 2.1, yields F(s)=F(1s) on C. Therefore Λ(s)=F(s)=F(1s)=Λ(1s) for every sC. The explicit pole term in step 1.1 shows that the poles at 0 and 1 are simple.

step 1.1step 2.1L1L4A1algebra

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources