How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Jacobi theta function satisfies
Statement
Assume countable choice. For every ,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable choice and a real number .
The Jacobi theta function is (The Jacobi theta function for ).
Assuming countable choice, for the Fourier transform with normalization is (Euclidean Gaussian transform with the 2π normalization).
Assuming countable choice, Poisson summation gives for every Schwartz function on (Poisson summation for Schwartz functions).
Proof
Repeated differentiation of gives a polynomial times the same Gaussian. For every polynomial , faster than any reciprocal power as , since . Thus is Schwartz and [L3] applies.
By [L1], . Poisson summation from [L3], step 1.1 and the exact Gaussian transform [L2] therefore give
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
32 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Elias M. Stein and Rami Shakarchi, Complex Analysis, Ch. 6 §2.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- K. Chandrasekharan, Lectures on the Riemann Zeta-Function, Lecture 12, The Theta Relation (standard reference, not scraped)