Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Stability and rank cutoff under adding a trivial summand

Example

Assume AC. Let E be a numerable complex bundle of rank m and F a numerable real bundle of rank n over a nonempty path-connected paracompact Hausdorff CW base, and let εr denote a trivial summand of the same kind. Then c(Eεr)=c(E),p(Fεr)=p(F), and the coefficient cutoffs hold: ci(E)=0 for i>m and pi(F)=0 whenever 2i>n.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, a nonempty path-connected paracompact Hausdorff CW base, a numerable complex bundle E of rank m, a numerable real bundle F of rank n, and trivial summands εr.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice is assumed, exactly as inherited from the characteristic-class suppliers (The Axiom of Choice).

[F1]

The trivial bundle has total Chern class 1, Chern classes are multiplicative, and ci=0 above the rank (Naturality, normalization, and Whitney sum for Chern classes, Chern classes from the projective-bundle relation).

[F2]

Pontryagin classes are stable under adding trivial summands and vanish above the real rank: pi(Eεr)=pi(E) and pi(E)=0 for 2i>rankE (Naturality, stability, and mod-two reduction of Pontryagin classes, Pontryagin classes by complexification).

[F3]

Trivial bundles are direct sums of trivial lines and direct sums are compatible with pullback (Whitney sum, tensor, dual, Hom, and exterior-power bundles).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Chern stability: by [F1] and [F3], c(εr)=1 and multiplicativity gives c(Eεr)=c(E)c(εr)=c(E); the cutoff ci=0 for i>m is part of the definition.

F1F3
1.2

Pontryagin stability: by [F2] the classes pi are unchanged when a trivial summand is adjoined, and pi(F)=0 whenever 2i>n by the defining cutoff.

F2
2.1

Consistency of the two parities: in the complex case the total class is unchanged, so all components are unchanged; in the real case the total Pontryagin class as a finite sum ipi is unchanged because each pi is.

step 1.1step 1.2
3.1

Boundary cases. For r=0 both identities are trivial; for E or F trivial of rank zero, c(0)=1 and p(0)=1 by the conventions, so the identities read c(εr)=1 and p(εr)=1. The rank cutoffs are strict: they force ci(E)=0 only for i>m and pi(F)=0 only for 2i>n. They do not include i=m or 2i=n, where the top Chern or Pontryagin class may be nonzero. The coefficient ring Z is nonzero and the sums are finite. AC is used only through [A1].

A1F1F2step 2.1

Source notes

Hatcher's sections 3.1-3.2 record both stability statements: adding a trivial summand does not change the total Chern class, nor the total Pontryagin class, and the coefficients vanish above the rank by construction.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources