Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pendingjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A stationary Ornstein–Uhlenbeck diffusion reverses to itself

Example

Assume AC. Let θ>0, σ>0, μ∈R, and let X0∼N(μ,σ2/(2θ)) be independent of a standard Brownian motion. Consider dXt=−θ(Xt−μ)dt+σdWt. For every finite horizon, Xt is stationary with density N(μ,σ2/(2θ)). Its time reversal has the same transition kernels and satisfies the same Ornstein–Uhlenbeck SDE; equivalently, the general reverse-drift formula gives −θ(x−μ).

Example references

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, θ>0, σ>0, an independent initial N(μ,σ2/(2θ)) state, and standard Brownian motion.

[A1]

AC is assumed by the Itô, deterministic Gaussian-integral, and reverse Brownian interfaces used below. The Axiom of Choice

[F1]

Itô's formula for the product of a differentiable deterministic factor and a Brownian-driven process gives the integrating-factor representation. Multidimensional Ito formula for Brownian-driven processes

[F2]

A deterministic Itô integral over (s,t] is centered Gaussian with variance its squared-integrand integral and is independent of the earlier filtration. A deterministic Itô integral has independent Gaussian increments

[F3]

A sum of independent Gaussian variables is Gaussian with mean and variance obtained by adding their means and variances; the characteristic function of an independent sum is the product of characteristic functions. Characteristic functions under affine maps and independent sums Standard normal and normal laws

[F4]

The normal law N(m,q) has density (2πq)−1/2exp⁡(−(x−m)2/(2q)) and the stated mean and variance. Standard normal and normal laws The standard normal density has total mass one

[F5]

Bayes' formula gives the reversed transition kernel as the forward joint density divided by the later marginal density; step 2.1 evaluates this ratio explicitly for the stationary Gaussian OU law.

[F6]

The globally Lipschitz forward OU coefficients give a unique nonexplosive strong solution. Itô SDE data and strong solution Global strong well-posedness for Lipschitz Itô SDEs

[F7]

The Borel sigma-algebra on continuous path space is generated by coordinate evaluations; finite-coordinate cylinders form a pi-system, and probability measures agreeing on a generating pi-system are equal. Borel sigma-algebra of continuous path space is generated by coordinates Finite-coordinate cylinders form a π-system Measures agreeing on a generating pi-system are equal under an increasing finite-measure exhaustion from that pi-system

Verification

1.1A1F1F2F3F4given

Applying [F1] to eθt(Xt−μ) gives, for t≥s, Xt−μ=e−θ(t−s)(Xs−μ)+σ∫ste−θ(t−r)dWr. The last term is independent of Fs and by [F2] is centered normal with variance σ2∫ste−2θ(t−r)dr=σ22θ(1−e−2θ(t−s)). With q=σ2/(2θ) and X0−μ∼N(0,q), the mean of Xt is μ and its variance is e−2θtq+q(1−e−2θt)=q. Independence and Gaussian addition [F3, F4] therefore give the same marginal law at every t.

2.1F2F3F4step 1.1algebra

Fix s<t and write r=e−θ(t−s), U=Xs−μ, and V=Xt−μ=rU+η, where U∼N(0,q) and η∼N(0,q(1−r2)) is independent of U by step 1.1. Their joint density is proportional to exp⁡ ⁣[−12(u2q+(v−ru)2q(1−r2))],u2q+(v−ru)2q(1−r2)=(u−rv)2q(1−r2)+v2q. Thus Xs∣Xt=y has law N(μ+r(y−μ),q(1−r2)), exactly the forward transition law over the same time gap. Bayes' formula shows that the reversed transition kernels equal the forward OU transition kernels.

3.1F1F2F3F4F5F6F7step 2.1algebra∎

By [F5] and step 2.1, the reversed process starts from the stationary law and has the same transition kernels as the forward OU process. Indeed, the forward joint density along an ordered time list is the stationary density times the product of the forward transition densities. The Bayes identity in step 2.1 gives detailed balance for each transition factor, so reversing this product gives the Markov factorization with the same kernels in reverse-time order. Thus all finite-dimensional distributions of Y equal those of the forward OU process. Extend each path constantly after T; the extended paths are random elements of C([0,∞),R) because each coordinate evaluation is measurable. By [F7], their Borel laws are equal. On a forward OU path define Γ(X)u=Xu−X0+θ∫0u(Xr−μ) drσ,0≤u≤T. The integral equation makes Γ(X)=W; because the natural filtration of X is contained in the forward filtration, this driver is Brownian relative to that natural filtration. The map from a continuous path to Γ(X) is continuous in the uniform norm on [0,T], so equality of path laws transfers this Brownian property to Bu:=Γ(Y)u. Rearranging its definition gives dYu=−θ(Yu−μ) du+σ dBu in the natural reversed filtration. Finally, the stationary score is ∂xlog⁡p(x)=−(x−μ)/q=−2θ(x−μ)/σ2. With b(x)=−θ(x−μ) and a(x)=σ2, the score-form drift equals −b(x)+a(x)∂xlog⁡p(x)=θ(x−μ)−2θ(x−μ)=−θ(x−μ), as stated.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

115 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources