Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A deterministic Itô integral has independent Gaussian increments

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Fix a finite integer d≥1, a horizon T>0, and a complete filtered probability space (Ω,F,(Ft)0≤t≤T,P). Let W=(Wt)0≤t≤T be a standard d-dimensional Brownian motion adapted to the filtration, and assume that for every 0≤s<t≤T the vector increment Wt−Ws is independent of Fs and has law Nd(0,(t−s)Id). Let g:[0,T]→(0,∞) be continuously differentiable with constants 0<gmin⁡≤g(t)≤gmax⁡<∞, set v(t)=∫0tg(r)2 dr, and define Mt=(∫0tg(r) dWr1,…,∫0tg(r) dWrd) by coordinatewise scalar Itô integration. For every 0≤s<t≤T, the increment Mt−Ms is independent of Fs and has law Nd(0,(v(t)−v(s))Id). Consequently, the increments of M over every finite increasing time list are mutually independent.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Full AC, the filtered vector Brownian motion and deterministic integrand stated above, and the coordinatewise scalar Itô integrals constructed in L2.

[A1]

The full Axiom of Choice is available. The Axiom of Choice

[F1]

A standard d-dimensional Brownian motion has mutually independent vector increments on every finite increasing time list, each with law Nd(0,(tj−tj−1)Id). d-dimensional Brownian motion

[F2]

Under the standing filtered Brownian hypothesis, increments after a time r are independent of Fr; deterministic step integrands are elementary predictable integrands. Elementary predictable Brownian integrands

[F3]

The Itô integral of an elementary predictable integrand is the finite sum of its coefficients times the corresponding Brownian increments. Ito integral of an elementary predictable process

[F4]

A square-integrable predictable Itô integral is the L2 limit of elementary integrals, independent of the chosen approximating sequence. Ito integral for square-integrable predictable processes

[F5]

The scalar Itô integral is an isometry from predictable L2 into mean-zero L2. Applied coordinatewise, it gives E∣I(H)−I(K)∣2=d E∫0T∣Hs−Ks∣2ds for deterministic scalar integrands. Ito isometry and linearity in predictable L2

[F6]

For a square-integrable real random variable Y, the variance E[(Y−EY)2] is nonnegative. Moments, variance, and covariance on a probability space

[F7]

L2 convergence implies convergence of norms by the reverse triangle inequality. The Lp norm descends to the quotient and makes Lp a normed space for 1≤p≤∞

[F8]

Tonelli permits interchange of the time integral and expectation for nonnegative measurable functions. Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product

[F9]

The law Nd(m,Σ) is defined by its one-dimensional normal projections for every vector in Rd. Multivariate normal law, including singular covariance

[F10]

The characteristic function of Nd(m,Σ) is θ↦exp⁡(iθ⋅m−θTΣθ/2) and uniquely determines its law, including singular covariance matrices. Characteristic function of a multivariate normal law

[F11]

The Itô integral process has an adapted continuous martingale version. The Ito integral process has a continuous martingale version

Proof

Given: The hypotheses and notation of the statement.

1.1A1F4F6F7F8

Fix 0≤s<t≤T and put H(r)=g(r)1(s,t](r). By [F4], choose elementary predictable approximants Hn(r,ω)=∑kξn,k(ω)1(rn,k,rn,k+1](r) converging to H in L2(dr⊗P). On each interval define the deterministic coefficient ξˉn,k=E[ξn,k] and let Hˉn=∑kξˉn,k1(rn,k,rn,k+1]. Boundedness of the elementary coefficients makes these expectations finite. For every r in the kth interval, nonnegativity of Var⁡(ξn,k−H(r)) from [F6] gives ∣ξˉn,k−H(r)∣2≤E∣ξn,k−H(r)∣2. Integrating and applying [F7], with Tonelli [F8] to exchange the time integral and expectation of this nonnegative integrand, yields ∥Hˉn−H∥L2([0,T])2≤E∫0T∣Hn−H∣2dr→0. Set Hn0=Hˉn1(s,t]; it remains a deterministic step integrand and its error cannot increase, because H=0 outside (s,t].

1.2F1F2F3A1

Write Hn0=∑jan,j1(un,j,un,j+1] on a partition of [s,t]. By [F3], its vector integral is Zn=∑jan,j(Wun,j+1−Wun,j). For θ∈Rd, independence and the Gaussian increment laws in [F1] give Eeiθ⋅Zn=∏jexp⁡(−an,j2(un,j+1−un,j)∣θ∣2/2)=exp⁡(−∣θ∣2∫st(Hn0)2dr/2). The same factorization holds with any indicator 1A, A∈Fs, inserted: each increment is independent of the sigma-algebra at its left endpoint, which contains A and all preceding increments, so repeated factorization gives E[1Aeiθ⋅Zn]=P(A)Eeiθ⋅Zn.

2.1F5step 1.1step 1.2F6F7F10A1

Let Z=Mt−Ms. By [F5] applied to the deterministic step integrands, E∣Zn−Z∣2=d∫st∣Hn0(r)−g(r)∣2dr→0. Since ∣eiθ⋅z−eiθ⋅w∣≤∣θ∣∣z−w∣, nonnegativity of the variance of ∣Zn−Z∣ in [F6] gives convergence of both the ordinary and 1A-weighted characteristic functions. Also ∫st(Hn0)2dr→∫stg(r)2dr=v(t)−v(s) by the square-integrable norm convergence in step 1.1 and the norm-continuity result [F7]. Passing to the limit in step 1.2 therefore gives Eeiθ⋅Z=exp⁡(−∣θ∣2(v(t)−v(s))/2) and E[1Aeiθ⋅Z]=P(A)exp⁡(−∣θ∣2(v(t)−v(s))/2) for every θ and every A∈Fs.

3.1step 2.1F9F10A1

The multivariate-normal convention [F9] identifies the Gaussian law from its one-dimensional normal projections, and [F10] gives the characteristic function in step 2.1 for those projections. For any A∈Fs with P(A)>0, the probability measure B↦P(Z∈B,A)/P(A) has the same characteristic function by the second identity, so uniqueness in [F10] identifies it with that same Gaussian law. If P(A)=0, the joint probability is zero. Thus Z is independent of Fs.

4.1F11step 3.1A1∎

By [F11], M has an adapted continuous version. For any finite increasing list 0=t0<⋯<tn, the increments through time tj−1 are Ftj−1-measurable. Step 3.1 makes the next increment independent of that sigma-algebra; induction on j therefore factors the joint probabilities of all increment Borel sets into the product of their marginal probabilities. This proves mutual independence over the list.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

65 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources