How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Gaussian smoothing converges weakly at the endpoint
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Fix , , and a Borel probability measure on supported in for some finite . Let be continuously differentiable and satisfy ; set . On a complete filtered probability space with the usual conditions, let be measurable at time zero with law and independent of future Brownian increments. Let be a standard adapted -dimensional Brownian motion whose increment is independent of and has law for . Let be the unique strong solution of , and write . For Borel probability laws with finite second moments, write for the square root of the infimum of over Borel probability couplings of and . For every ,
As , in probability and converges weakly to , meaning that for every bounded continuous real function on . This estimate controls endpoint truncation only: it gives no bound for learned-score error or numerical-discretization error, and asserts no density or score regularity at .
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The probability space, Brownian motion, initial random vector, coefficient, and strong solution in the statement.
The full Axiom of Choice is assumed by the inherited Brownian and Itô interfaces. The Axiom of Choice
The deterministic Itô increment is independent of and has law . A deterministic Itô integral has independent Gaussian increments
The strong-solution equation identifies with the corresponding Itô integral. Itô SDE data and strong solution
Under the stated globally Lipschitz and linear-growth SDE hypotheses there is a unique strong solution with continuous paths. Global strong well-posedness for Lipschitz Itô SDEs
The positive-time law has the stated Gaussian-mixture density, and . Gaussian-smoothed data law and transition density
The law of a random element is its probability pushforward. Law or distribution of a random element
Weak convergence of Borel probability laws is tested by bounded continuous real functions. Weak convergence of borel probability measures
For laws with finite second moments, is the square root of the infimum of quadratic costs over their Borel couplings. The Euclidean quadratic Wasserstein space
The Borel sigma-algebra on a finite-dimensional Euclidean product is the product of its Borel sigma-algebras. The Borel product of R^m and R^n is the Borel sigma-algebra of R^{m+n}
Proof
Given: The statement's hypotheses and notation.
The coefficients and are jointly Borel, globally Lipschitz in with constant zero, and satisfy . The initial support gives , and the complete usual filtered space, adapted Brownian increments, and independence of are hypotheses of the statement. Thus [F3] supplies the unique continuous strong solution. By [F2], . The characteristic-function identity in [F1] identifies this vector with , whose coordinate variances sum to . Thus . Also . For every , ; taking expectations gives .
The support condition gives , and step 1.1 gives . Hence both laws lie in the quadratic Wasserstein space. The measurable pair has a Borel law on by [F8]; by [F5] its marginals are and , and [F4] identifies as the smoothed law from the definition. Thus it is a coupling. Its cost is . Taking the infimum in [F7] proves .
Fix bounded continuous and let . Its restriction to compact is uniformly continuous; define , which tends to zero as . For , on the event , both vectors belong to , so their -values differ by at most . On the complementary event the difference is at most . Step 1.1 and Markov's inequality therefore give For fixed the second term tends to zero as ; then letting proves convergence for every such . This is weak convergence by [F6]. The estimates establish only the endpoint statements in the theorem.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- A deterministic Itô integral has independent Gaussian increments
- Gaussian-smoothed data law and transition density
- Itô SDE data and strong solution
- Global strong well-posedness for Lipschitz Itô SDEs
- Law or distribution of a random element
- Weak convergence of borel probability measures
- The Euclidean quadratic Wasserstein space
- The Borel product of R^m and R^n is the Borel sigma-algebra of R^{m+n}
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
53 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Gregory F. Lawler, Stochastic Calculus: An Introduction with Applications (standard reference, not scraped)
- John K. Hunter, Notes on Partial Differential Equations (standard reference, not scraped)