How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Global strong well-posedness for Lipschitz Itô SDEs
Statement
Assume the data and hypotheses of Itô SDE data and strong solution on , with , finite dimensions , Lipschitz constant , and linear-growth constant . There is a strong solution on the given filtered probability space. It is unique up to indistinguishability among strong solutions with the same initial value and Brownian driver, and it satisfies The bound is independent of any later numerical mesh.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the complete usual filtered Brownian space, , finite , jointly Borel coefficients with the stated uniform global Lipschitz and linear-growth constants, an -measurable independent of future Brownian increments, and the Axiom of Choice as required by the Itô-integral interfaces.
The Picard map is well-defined on adapted continuous inputs with finite path supremum; it has the path-sup difference estimate with , the growth estimate with , and the first-iterate bound . Well-definedness and estimates for the Lipschitz SDE map
A strong solution is an adapted continuous process on the given space with the locally defined finite-coordinate Itô integral equation satisfied indistinguishably. The complete filtration contains all null sets at time zero. Itô SDE data and strong solution
The declared Itô-integral and martingale interfaces use the Axiom of Choice; the Picard recursion, integer bounds, and stopping conventions below make no further selections. The Axiom of Choice
Cauchy–Schwarz bounds expectations by second moments; monotone convergence passes to expectations of nonnegative partial sums, and Fatou passes the finite-tail bounds to their pointwise limit. Cauchy-Schwarz for random variables Monotone convergence for the integral Fatou's lemma
For a continuous path, its supremum on equals the supremum over rational times in and the endpoint . The rationals embed densely in the reals
Every adapted continuous solution of the same SDE with the stated initial-value and coefficient hypotheses has finite . A Lipschitz SDE solution has a finite path-sup second moment
Every Cauchy sequence of real numbers converges. Hence, on each path where the Picard iterates are uniformly Cauchy, their finitely many coordinate sequences have real limits; these limits form the pointwise limit, and the uniform Cauchy bound passes to that limit. The reals are complete
Proof
If , set as the sole value of the process; both integrals vanish, the path-sup bound follows from , and any two solutions with that initial value agree. For , let be the map of [F1], set , and recursively set .
Put for . By [F1], and . Induction on gives .
The majorant series converges. If , it is identically zero; if , every term after the first is zero; otherwise the ratio of consecutive terms is . By [F4], and monotone convergence gives ; hence that nonnegative series is finite almost surely. On this event, for every the vector sequence is Cauchy, since ; [F7] gives the coordinate limits and therefore a vector limit . Letting in the same inequality bounds by the tail of the summable series, which tends to zero. Thus the convergence is almost surely uniform. For finite tails the triangle inequality follows by expanding the square and applying Cauchy–Schwarz, so . Fatou's lemma [F4] then gives .
Let be the measurable probability-one event on which that series of path suprema is finite; measurability follows because each supremum is a supremum over the countable dense set in [F5]. Uniform convergence makes continuous on ; completeness gives , so set on . For each fixed , the limit on of the -measurable , together with the -measurable value on , is -measurable. Thus is adapted and continuous, and its path-sup convergence places it in the class of [F2].
For every , . The difference estimate of [F1] gives . Since in the same norm by step 3.1, uniqueness of an limit implies indistinguishably. Hence satisfies the SDE.
Write . The growth estimate of [F1] and imply . Put and . Then , , and almost everywhere. Consequently almost everywhere, so .
If is any other strong solution with the same data, then by [F2] and by [F6]. The difference estimate in [F1] gives . With , one has and almost everywhere, hence . Thus almost surely, which is indistinguishability. AC is exactly the inherited assumption [F3].
Remarks
The proof uses no ellipticity or nondegeneracy of . The result gives strong existence, uniqueness, and moment control only; it implies no transition-density regularity, forward Kolmogorov uniqueness, or reversal theorem.
Sources
Van Handel, Chapter 5.1, Theorems 5.1.3 and 5.1.5 with proofs, and van der Vaart, Section 7.1, Theorem 7.8 with proof, independently develop Picard iteration and Gronwall uniqueness. The proof here supplies the vector coordinate estimates, complete path-space limit argument, and exact finite-horizon supremum bound under the displayed hypotheses.
Depends on
- Itô SDE data and strong solution
- Well-definedness and estimates for the Lipschitz SDE map
- A Lipschitz SDE solution has a finite path-sup second moment
- Cauchy-Schwarz for random variables
- Monotone convergence for the integral
- Fatou's lemma
- The rationals embed densely in the reals
- The reals are complete
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
- A deterministic initial law is singular although the SDE is well-posed Example
- A scalar Ornstein–Uhlenbeck SDE satisfies the strong well-posedness hypotheses Example
- Noise destabilizes explicit Euler while drift-implicit Euler contracts Example
- Finite-horizon Brownian change of drift and relative entropy Lemma
- Langevin diffusion has a reversible density and compact minorization Lemma
- Moment-weighted local defect bounds for BAOAB Lemma
- Pathwise relative-entropy error of the Langevin Euler interpolation Lemma
- Symmetric BAOAB one-step weak expansion Lemma
- Euler–Maruyama strong rate for square-integrable initial data Theorem
- Euler–Maruyama weak order one under backward regularity Theorem
- Finite-horizon moments for Lipschitz Itô SDEs Theorem
- Finite-time strong order one of BAOAB Theorem
- Finite-time weak order two of BAOAB Theorem
- Local strong existence and uniqueness up to exit for locally Lipschitz SDEs Theorem
- Strong error bound for Euler–Maruyama on a predictable grid Theorem
- The canonical Gibbs measure is stationary for underdamped Langevin dynamics Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
54 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ramon van Handel, Stochastic Calculus, Filtering, and Stochastic Control: Lecture Notes (ACM 217, Spring 2007), Chapter 5.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- A.W. van der Vaart, Martingales, Diffusions and Financial Mathematics (preliminary notes), Section 7.1 (standard reference, not scraped)