Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite-horizon Brownian change of drift and relative entropy

Statement

Assume AC. Let T>0, let W be a standard d-dimensional Brownian motion on a complete usual filtered probability space, with increments after s independent of Fs, and let θ be predictable with AT:=∫0T∣θs∣2ds<∞ almost surely. Set Mt=∫0tθs⋅dWs,At=∫0t∣θs∣2ds,Zt=exp⁡(Mt−At/2). If Z is a true martingale on [0,T], then Q=ZTP is equivalent to P, its restriction to F0 equals that of P, and Bt=Wt−∫0tθsds is standard Brownian motion under Q relative to the same filtration. If AT is bounded by a deterministic constant, Z is a true martingale. If additionally EPAT<∞, then D(P∥Q)=12EPAT.

Here is a sufficient condition that permits unbounded AT. Fix a globally Lipschitz vector field b:Rd→Rd, a finite deterministic grid 0=t0<⋯<tN=T, and η(t)=tk for tk≤t<tk+1. Let each of the two path drifts a,c be one of 0, b(Xt), or b(Xη(t)). Suppose Xt=X0+∫0tas(X)ds+2Wt,E∣X0∣2<∞, where X is adapted with continuous paths and the equation holds on one probability-one event for all t∈[0,T], while X0 is F0-measurable. For θt=(ct(X)−at(X))/2, the exponential Z above is a true martingale, and under Q the process X has the unique path law with initial law LP(X0) and drift c and dispersion 2Id. Moreover EPAT<∞, so the entropy identity applies. Values of the piecewise coefficients at grid points do not affect any integral.

Finally, for any probability measures R≪S and measurable statistic F, relative entropy decreases under pushforward: D(F#R∥F#S)≤D(R∥S). All equivalence and entropy assertions concern this finite horizon.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC and the filtered Brownian data, integrand, horizon and, for the sufficient condition, the vector field, grid, initial value and solution specified in the Statement.

[F1]

Localized predictable Brownian integrals exist; stopping commutes with integration; finite-energy integrals are continuous square-integrable mean-zero martingales and obey their isometry. The multidimensional Itô formula applies to Brownian Itô processes with locally integrable drift and locally square-integrable diffusion. In particular it applies to exponentials of (M,A) and products of two such processes. Localized Ito integral Stopping an Ito integral The Ito integral process has a continuous martingale version Ito isometry and linearity in predictable L2 Multidimensional Ito formula for Brownian-driven processes

[F2]

A continuous vector local martingale starting at zero with covariation matrix tId is Brownian relative to its filtration; its increments are independent of the earlier sigma-algebra. Vector Levy characterization

[F3]

Conditional expectations are characterized by event integrals and preserve order; the tower property holds. Conditional expectations of a fixed integrable terminal variable are UI; UI and convergence in probability imply L1 convergence. Bounded optional sampling applies to the finite discrete-time martingale obtained by sampling a continuous martingale on a deterministic grid; the continuous-time extension is proved in step 1.2 below. Conditional expectation as an ae class Basic algebra and order properties of conditional expectation Tower property of conditional expectation Uniform integrability of conditional expectations of one variable Uniform integrability plus convergence in probability implies L1 convergence Optional sampling for bounded stopping times

[F4]

Each Brownian coordinate satisfies Esup⁡t≤T∣Wti∣2≤4T. The globally Lipschitz diffusion has a unique strong solution with finite second path moment, constructed by Picard iteration. Doob maximal bound for the Ito integral Global strong well-posedness for Lipschitz Itô SDEs

[F5]

Continuous adapted processes are predictable; interval step processes with coefficients measurable at the left endpoint have predictable versions. Adapted continuous processes are progressively measurable Progressively measurable and predictable processes

[F6]

Fatou, dominated convergence, monotone convergence, Tonelli and Cauchy–Schwarz apply to the displayed integrable or nonnegative quantities. Radon–Nikodym densities are determined by their event integrals and change measure in integrals. Relative entropy is directional, and xlog⁡x≥−1/e for x≥0, with 0log⁡0=0. Fatou's lemma Dominated convergence Monotone convergence for the integral Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product Cauchy-Schwarz for random variables A sigma-finite signed measure that is absolutely continuous with respect to a sigma-finite positive measure has a unique almost-everywhere density Likelihood-ratio change of measure Kullback–Leibler divergence

[F7]

The Borel sigma-algebra of continuous path space is generated by coordinate evaluations. The finite-horizon version follows by restriction and constant extension, and the vector version by finite products of scalar path spaces. Thus independence on finite coordinate cylinders extends to independence on the full Borel path space. Borel sigma-algebra of continuous path space is generated by coordinates

[A1]

AC is inherited from the Brownian Itô, conditional-expectation, Levy, and SDE suppliers; the integer localizers and deterministic meshes below require no additional choice principle. The Axiom of Choice

Proof

1.1F1F3F5F6given

By [F1], applied to f(m,a)=em−a/2, dZt=Ztθt⋅dWt. Stopping at integer levels of A, ∣M∣ and Z makes the integral finite-energy, so Z is a positive continuous local martingale. All these stops tend beyond every time strictly less than T, and stabilize at T, because the paths and energy are bounded on [0,T]. A nonnegative local martingale N is a supermartingale: Fatou first gives integrability, and conditional Fatou gives E[Nt∣Fs]≤lim inf⁡jE[Nt∧ρj∣Fs]=lim inf⁡jNs∧ρj=Ns for a localizing sequence. The conditional Fatou assertion follows by taking the increasing infima of the tails, using conditional order and monotone convergence; conditional monotone convergence follows by ordinary monotone convergence in the defining event integrals. Thus EZt≤1, and the same assertion applies to the stopped exponential for every scalar multiple of θ.

1.2F3F6

We record the continuous stopping consequence needed below. Let V be a continuous true martingale on [0,T]. For ρ≤T, round ρ upward to stopping times ρj on finite grids whose meshes tend to zero. Discrete bounded optional sampling in [F3] gives Vρj=E[VT∣Fρj]. This family is UI and converges almost surely to Vρ, hence in L1. If A∈Fρ, then A∈Fρj, as is checked by the defining stopped-event tests, so passage in those tests gives Vρ=E[VT∣Fρ]. In particular the family of all Vρ, ρ≤T, is UI. Stopping preserves true martingality: for fixed s<t, choose the grids on [0,t] to contain s; the finite-grid identity E[1AVt∧ρj]=E[1AVs∧ρj] for A∈Fs follows by telescoping grid increments with the left-endpoint measurable stopping indicators. Continuity and the preceding UI argument pass it to Vρ. Thus both continuous stopping facts used below have been derived from the discrete supplier.

1.3F3F6algebra

To prove data processing, write r=dR/dS, and let u be the density of F#R relative to F#S; absolute continuity follows immediately by taking inverse images of null sets. Testing events in σ(F) gives u∘F=ES[r∣σ(F)]. If D(R∥S)=∞ the desired inequality is immediate. Otherwise ϕ(r) is integrable, where ϕ(x)=xlog⁡x on x>0 and ϕ(0)=0, since its negative part is bounded by 1/e. For positive rational a, the tangent line ℓa(x)=(1+log⁡a)x−a lies below ϕ(x) on x≥0, by differentiating their difference, and ϕ(x)=sup⁡a∈Q, a>0ℓa(x), including x=0 by a↓0. Conditional order gives ℓa(ES[r∣σ(F)])≤ES[ϕ(r)∣σ(F)]. Intersect these countably many full events, take the supremum and then expectations. This yields D(F#R∥F#S)≤D(R∥S), with left integrability following from the lower bound −1/e and the displayed conditional upper bound.

2.1F1F3step 1.1algebra

If AT≤n, then at every stopping time ρ≤T, Zρ2=exp⁡(2Mρ−2Aρ)exp⁡(Aρ), whence EZρ2≤en by step 1.1 applied to the stopped integrand 2θ1[0,ρ]. Apply this bound to localizing stops for Z. Their terminal values are UI, since their tail integrals are at most en/R above level R. They converge almost surely, and hence in L1, to ZT. The same holds at every earlier time, so passage in martingale event tests proves true martingality. In particular Zt=E[ZT∣Ft].

2.2F1F3F5F6step 1.1

Suppose Z is true and put Q=ZTP. Since 0<ZT<∞ almost surely, these probabilities are equivalent. For A∈Ft, Q(A)=EP[ZT1A]=EP[Zt1A] by [F3], so Q∣Ft=ZtP∣Ft; at t=0 this is Q∣F0=P∣F0. The measures have identical null sets, so completeness and the usual filtration conditions persist. Let B=W−∫θds, whose drift has finite total variation by pathwise Cauchy–Schwarz. For a coordinate i, let σr be the first time ∣Bi∣ reaches r, capped at T. These are stopping times because continuous adapted path suprema are measurable by their rational-time suprema. Product Itô gives d(ZtBt∧σri)=Zt1[0,σr](t)dWti+Bt∧σriZtθt⋅dWt. The finite-variation terms cancel against d[Z,Wi]t=Ztθtidt. The right side is locally square integrable, so the product is a P-local martingale.

3.1F3F6step 1.2step 2.2

For every ρ≤T, ∣ZρBρ∧σri∣≤rZρ. By step 1.2, Zρ=E[ZT∣Fρ], and these random variables form a UI family. Hence the localizing stopped products in step 2.2 are UI. Passing their event tests in L1 makes ZBi,σr a true P-martingale. For A∈Fs, change of measure at times s,t now gives EQ[1ABt∧σri]=EP[1AZtBt∧σri]=EP[1AZsBs∧σri]=EQ[1ABs∧σri]. Thus Bi is a Q-local martingale. Its localizers increase to the horizon because continuous paths are bounded on each compact interval.

3.2F1F6step 2.2

If EPAT<∞, [F1] gives EPMT=0 and EPMT2=EPAT. Since dQ/dP=ZT>0, dP/dQ=1/ZT and −log⁡ZT=−MT+AT/2 is P-integrable. The definition of relative entropy therefore gives D(P∥Q)=EP[−log⁡ZT]=EPAT/2. This establishes the asserted identity whenever Z is true; it does not yet presume true martingality in the unbounded-energy sufficient condition.

4.1F1F2F6step 3.1

Subtracting a continuous finite-variation path preserves quadratic covariations: its squared-increment sum is at most its largest increment times its total variation, and its mixed-increment sum with Wi is at most the largest Brownian increment times that variation. Both errors tend to zero pathwise along every vanishing-mesh partition. The Brownian covariation limits also hold in Q-probability: P(En)→0 implies Q(En)=EP[ZT1En]→0 by integrability of ZT. Consequently [Bi,Bj]t=δijt under Q, and [F2] proves that B is Q-Brownian. The cited proof applies on [0,T] because it uses only finite pairs of times. Equivalently, if the Brownian space is defined for all times, set θ=0 after T and keep Z constant; the argument applies on every horizon and uses [F2] literally. A space defined only up to T can first be extended by an independent Brownian continuation.

5.1F4F5step 2.1step 4.1given

Consider that sufficient condition. The three candidate drifts are predictable by [F5] and obey ∣vt(X)∣≤K(1+sup⁡u≤t∣Xu∣) for some common K. The base Brownian and Euler equations are explicit, and the diffusion equation is covered by [F4]. Their solutions have finite second path moment: for Euler this follows immediately from its finite recursion and the Brownian maximal bound. Pathwise boundedness gives AT<∞. Set τn=inf⁡{t:At≥n}∧T and Ztn=exp⁡(Mt∧τn−At∧τn/2). By step 2.1 it is a true martingale. Under Qn=ZTnP, step 4.1 gives Brownian motion Bn=W−∫0⋅∧τnθsds, and substitution in the additive equation gives dXt=(1[0,τn](t)ct(X)+1(τn,T](t)at(X))dt+2dBtn. The initial law is unchanged and the switched drift obeys the same K bound.

6.1F4F6step 5.1algebra

Uniformly in n, EQnsup⁡t≤T∣Xt∣2≤CT:=(1+3E∣X0∣2+24dT)e6K2T2−1. To establish finiteness without assuming it, first stop X at its first exit from a ball of radius R. If ∣X0∣≥R the stop is zero and the stopped path is X0, which retains its integrable second moment. Before stopping, the drift bound uses the corresponding stopped path supremum. Cauchy–Schwarz, ∣x+y+z∣2≤3(∣x∣2+∣y∣2+∣z∣2), and [F4] therefore bound its expected squared supremum qn,R(t) by 3E∣X0∣2+24dT+6K2T∫0t(1+qn,R(s))ds. These quantities are finite for fixed R. Put H(t)=1+3E∣X0∣2+24dT+6K2T∫0t(1+qn,R(s))ds; then 1+qn,R≤H and H′≤6K2TH almost everywhere, so the integrating factor gives qn,R(T)≤CT. The ball stops tend to T on every bounded continuous path; Fatou proves the displayed bound.

7.1F1F5F6step 4.1step 5.1step 6.1

For the integrands used here, elementary left-endpoint sums on deterministic partitions refining the Euler grid give the identity MT∧τn=∫0T1[0,τn](s)θs⋅dBsn+AT∧τn. Here is a direct justification across the measure change. All path coefficients are continuous on each of finitely many open mesh intervals; multiplying by the stopping indicator adds at most one discontinuity. Stop further on bounded path and coefficient levels. Their left-endpoint staircases converge for almost every time on each path, are bounded, and hence converge in predictable L2 under both equivalent measures by dominated convergence. Both Brownian integrals converge by their respective isometries, while the drift integral converges by Cauchy–Schwarz. For each elementary sum the identity follows by substituting dW=dBn+1[0,τn]θds. Equivalence identifies the probability limits; removing the extra increasing stops proves the displayed identity. The Qn-Brownian integral has mean zero since its energy is at most n. As ∣θt∣2≤4K2(1+sup⁡u≤t∣Xu∣2), step 6.1 yields EP[ZTnlog⁡ZTn]=12EQnAT∧τn≤2K2T(1+CT).

8.1F3F6step 1.1step 3.2step 5.1step 7.1

Since zlog⁡z≥−1/e, step 7.1 gives, for R>1, EP[ZTn1{ZTn>R}]≤(2K2T(1+CT)+1/e)/log⁡R. Thus (ZTn) is UI. On every path with AT<∞, τn=T for all sufficiently large n, so ZTn→ZT almost surely and in L1. In particular EZT=1. Step 1.1 gives a supermartingale with initial mean one and terminal mean one, so every intermediate mean equals one; the nonnegative conditional supermartingale deficit has mean zero, proving true martingality of Z. Apply step 4.1 without stops to get the target equation. The base finite second path moment in step 5.1 and the coefficient bound imply EPAT<∞, so step 3.2 applies.

9.1F2F4F6F7step 4.1step 8.1

The target path law is uniquely determined, as follows. For target zero it is X0+2B; for Euler target it is the finite mesh recursion, a Borel function of (X0,B). For target b(Xt), use the Picard recursion Xm+1=X0+∫0⋅b(Xsm)ds+2B starting with Xt0=X0. Its iterates are Borel functions on Rd×C([0,T],Rd): integration of a continuous path is a uniform limit of its deterministic Riemann sums. For every fixed input (x,w), put C=T∣b(x)∣+2sup⁡∣w∣. The first iterate difference has supremum at most C, and induction in the Lipschitz integral inequality bounds the mth difference up to time t by CLm−1tm−1/(m−1)!. Their uniformly summable majorant proves uniform convergence for every continuous input. The limit is consequently a Borel function of that input. The deterministic Lipschitz integral inequality makes any solution with the same input agree with this limit: if h(t) is the path supremum of their difference, h(t)≤L∫0th(s)ds, and the integrating factor forces h=0. Under the changed measure, B has Wiener law and is independent of X0, because its future increments are independent of F0; independence of the entire path follows first on finite-time cylinder events and then on their generated Borel sigma-algebra by [F7]. Thus (X0,B) has the same product law on every such space, and its Borel solution map proves the asserted uniqueness in law.

10.1A1step 2.1step 4.1step 3.2step 8.1step 9.1step 1.3∎

If θ=0, then Z=1, Q=P and the entropy is zero. A zero mesh interval is omitted; the stated grid has strictly positive lengths, and no lower bound on those lengths is needed. At time zero all integrals vanish and the initial law is preserved. The excluded horizon T=0 has the same trivial conclusions. AC has exactly the inherited uses in [A1].

Source notes

Van der Vaart, Theorem 6.9 and Theorem 6.14 with their proofs, supply the exponential/product route and its source provenance. The bounded-energy argument above replaces the source's general Novikov/time-change argument. The entropy localization is supplied explicitly for the required linear-growth path drifts. No general Girsanov, Novikov, semimartingale measure-invariance, or weak-uniqueness theorem is taken as an unproved premise.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

159 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources