Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Langevin diffusion has a reversible density and compact minorization

Statement

Assume AC. Let d≥1, U∈C2(Rd), ∇U be L-Lipschitz, and let x⋆ be a global minimizer with U(x⋆)=0. The solutions of dXt=−∇U(Xt) dt+2 dBt,X0=x, define a Borel Markov semigroup Pt. For every t>0 it has a positive jointly Borel density pt(x,y) relative to Lebesgue measure, and e−U(x)pt(x,y)=e−U(y)pt(y,x). If Z=∫e−U dx∈(0,∞), then Z−1e−U(x)dx is invariant. For every R>0 and t>0, there are ϵ>0 and a probability ν such that Pt(x,A)≥ϵν(A) for every Borel A and ∥x−x⋆∥≤R.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC and the potential, minimizer, and Brownian equation in the Statement.

[A1]

AC is inherited through Brownian, Gaussian, Ito and change-of-measure constructions. The Axiom of Choice

[F1]

Globally Lipschitz coefficients with linear growth have a unique strong solution from each square-integrable initial state on every finite horizon. Global strong well-posedness for Lipschitz Itô SDEs

[F2]

A true stochastic exponential changes a Brownian drift by its integrand. Finite-horizon Brownian change of drift and relative entropy

[F3]

Multidimensional Ito's formula applies to U(x+2Bt) and to its exponential compositions. Multidimensional Ito formula for Brownian-driven processes

[F4]

Brownian finite-dimensional laws are Gaussian with covariance min⁡(s,u)Id, independent future increments, and continuous paths; uncorrelated jointly Gaussian finite blocks are independent. d-dimensional Brownian motion Uncorrelated jointly Gaussian blocks are independent

[F5]

Continuous-path Borel sets are generated by rational evaluations; equality on a generating pi-system extends by the pi-lambda theorem. The same assertion on a finite interval and in finitely many coordinates follows by restriction, constant extension, and finite products. Borel sigma-algebra of continuous path space is generated by coordinates Dynkin's pi-lambda theorem

[F6]

The Gaussian increment 2Bt has density ht(z)=(4πt)−d/2e−∥z∥2/(4t). Each coordinate Brownian path obeys Esup⁡s≤t∣Bsi∣2≤4t. A positive-definite multivariate normal law has its Gaussian density Doob maximal bound for the Ito integral

[F7]

Tonelli interchanges nonnegative integrals, and dominated convergence applies under a fixed integrable majorant. Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product Dominated convergence

[F8]

A differentiable global minimizer has zero gradient. Fermat's theorem: an interior differentiable local extremum has zero gradient

Proof

Given: The hypotheses in the Statement.

1.1A1F1F4F8construct

Put g=∇U. By [F8], g(x⋆)=0, so ∥g(x)∥≤L∥x−x⋆∥; the equation meets [F1]. Its additive-noise integral equation is Xs=x−∫0sg(Xu)du+2Bs. For each continuous input path the deterministic Picard iteration converges uniformly on finite intervals: successive differences are bounded by a fixed finite constant times Lnsn/n!, by repeated integration. The limit is the unique solution; subtraction and the same iterative integral bound give sup⁡s≤t∥Xsx,w−Xsz,v∥≤eLt(∥x−z∥+2sup⁡s≤t∥ws−vs∥). Thus the solution is a continuous function of its initial point and driving path. Its flow composition identity follows from uniqueness of the integral equation. Independent Brownian future increments [F4] now give the Markov and semigroup identities; integration of its Borel solution map against the Brownian law gives a Borel transition kernel. Solutions on integer horizons agree by uniqueness and hence define all t≥0.

1.2F4F5F6construct

Define βs=2(Bs−sBt/t) for 0≤s≤t. For any finite list of times its coordinates together with Bt are jointly Gaussian and Cov⁡(Bs−sBt/t,Bt)=0. By [F4] that finite bridge block is independent of Bt. Apply [F5] to rational-time cylinders to obtain independence of the entire bridge path and Bt. Thus Brownian paths disintegrate explicitly as Ys=x+(s/t)(y−x)+βs when their endpoint has value y, with endpoint density ht(y−x) and bridge law independent of y. This identity holds first for cylinder functions by independence and the Gaussian endpoint density, then for all bounded Borel path functions by [F5], and for nonnegative ones by monotone approximation. The bridge has covariance 2(min⁡(s,u)−su/t)Id, which is unchanged when (s,u) is replaced by (t−s,t−u); its mean is zero. Gaussian finite-dimensional laws and [F5] therefore also give equality in law of βs and βt−s.

2.1F2F3F7step 1.1algebra

Under Brownian law put Ys=x+2Bs. The stochastic exponential with integrand −g(Ys)/2 is, by [F3], Zs=exp⁡ ⁣(U(x)−U(Ys)2+∫0s{ΔU(Yu)2−∥g(Yu)∥24}du). Lipschitz continuity gives ∣∂iiU∣≤L by taking coordinate difference quotients. Since U≥0, for s≤t this positive local martingale is bounded above by eU(x)/2+tdL/2. Stop at increasing energy/local-martingale levels. Dominated convergence [F7] in the stopped martingale identities makes Z a true martingale of mean one. By [F2], under Zt times Brownian law the process Bs+∫0sg(Yu)/2 du is Brownian, so Y solves the Langevin equation. The explicit unique solution map of step 1.1 identifies its law with Pt(x,⋅).

3.1F5F7step 2.1step 1.2algebra

Put H(z)=ΔU(z)/2−∥g(z)∥2/4 and bsx,y=x+(s/t)(y−x)+βs. Combining steps 2.1 and 1.2 gives the density pt(x,y)=ht(y−x)e(U(x)−U(y))/2 Eexp⁡ ⁣(∫0tH(bsx,y)ds). The integral is a continuous function of (x,y,β) in the uniform path topology, since H is continuous and uniformly continuous on each compact set containing the convergent paths. Its exponential is strictly positive and bounded above by etdL/2. Consequently its expectation is positive, finite, and continuous in (x,y) by dominated convergence; the density is jointly Borel. Its integral in y is one by step 2.1. Bridge reversal from step 1.2 interchanges x,y without changing the integral of H, and ht(y−x)=ht(x−y). Multiplication by e−U(x) proves the asserted symmetry. If Z<∞, Tonelli and the mass-one identity give ∫Z−1e−U(x)pt(x,y)dx=Z−1e−U(y)∫pt(y,x)dx=Z−1e−U(y), proving invariance.

4.1F6F7step 1.1step 3.1algebra∎

By [F6], Esup⁡s≤t∥Bs∥2≤4dt, and sup⁡∥βs∥2≤8sup⁡∥Bs∥2. With a0=64dt, Markov's inequality (integrate 1{Y>a02}≤Y/a02 for Y=sup⁡∥β∥2) gives Pr⁡(sup⁡∥β∥≤a0)≥1/2. If both endpoints lie in the ball D={∥z−x⋆∥≤R}, on this event the bridge lies in the radius R+a0 ball. Therefore H(bsx,y)≥−dL/2−L2(R+a0)2/4 and the bridge expectation in step 3.1 is at least one half times the exponential of −t[dL/2+L2(R+a0)2/4]. The heat factor is at least (4πt)−d/2e−R2/t on D2, and e(U(x)−U(y))/2≥e−sup⁡DU/2>0. Thus a constant c>0 bounds pt below on D2. Let ν be normalized Lebesgue measure on D and ϵ=min⁡{cLeb⁡(D),1/2}>0. Integrating the density over A∩D proves the stated minorization. The radius is positive, so the normalizing volume is finite and nonzero.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

132 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources