Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite-horizon moments for Lipschitz Itô SDEs

Statement

Assume the SDE data of Itô SDE data and strong solution and the global strong solution supplied by Global strong well-posedness for Lipschitz Itô SDEs. For every real p≥2 with E∣X0∣p<∞, the unique solution satisfies sup⁡0≤t≤TE∣Xt∣p≤2p/2(1+E∣X0∣p)eCpT,Cp:=2 pK+p(p−1)K2. The supremum is over the individual-time moments; for p>2 this statement does not assert an Esup⁡t≤T∣Xt∣p bound. In particular, if X0 has every finite moment of order p≥2, then the solution has uniform finite-horizon moments of every such order.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the usual filtered-space SDE data, T≥0, d,m≥1, global Lipschitz and linear-growth coefficients with constant K, X0∈Lp for a fixed real p≥2, and the unique strong solution X.

[F1]

The unique solution has continuous adapted paths and Esup⁡t≤T∣Xt∣2<∞. Global strong well-posedness for Lipschitz Itô SDEs

[F2]

An adapted continuous process is predictable and progressive. Once its finite-coordinate drift and diffusion coefficients have the local integrability required by the continuous Brownian Itô-process definition, the multidimensional C1,2 Itô formula holds up to indistinguishability. Tonelli's theorem justifies the expected time-integral interchanges below for the nonnegative coefficient and stopped-energy integrands. Adapted continuous processes are progressively measurable Progressively measurable and predictable processes Continuous Brownian Ito processes Multidimensional Ito formula for Brownian-driven processes Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product

[F3]

For a stopping time τ, the stopped integral satisfies (H⋅W)t∧τ=∫0t1[0,τ]H dW; a finite-energy Itô integral is a square-integrable mean-zero martingale and obeys its isometry. Stopping an Ito integral The Ito integral process has a continuous martingale version Ito isometry and linearity in predictable L2

[F4]

A stopping time is characterized by {τ≤t}∈Ft; for a continuous adapted path its supremum on [0,t] equals the supremum on rational times together with the endpoint. Continuous-time stopping times and stopped sigma-algebras The rationals embed densely in the reals

[F5]

Fatou's lemma passes a pointwise almost-sure limit of nonnegative variables to the lower bound on their expectations. Fatou's lemma

[F6]

The scalar Itô integral and multidimensional Itô formula carry the Axiom of Choice; no additional choice is made here. The Axiom of Choice

Proof

1.1givenalgebra

If T=0, then ∣X0∣p≤2p/2(1+∣X0∣p) and the result follows. For T>0, put V(x)=(1+∣x∣2)p/2. It is C2 and ∂iV=pxi(1+∣x∣2)p/2−1,∂ijV=pδij(1+∣x∣2)p/2−1+p(p−2)xixj(1+∣x∣2)p/2−2. The gradient bound follows from ∣x∣≤(1+∣x∣2)1/2. The Hessian is a nonnegative multiple of I plus a nonnegative multiple of xxT, so it is positive semidefinite. Its eigenvalues orthogonal to x are p(1+∣x∣2)p/2−1, and the eigenvalue in the x direction is p(1+∣x∣2)p/2−2(1+(p−1)∣x∣2); each is at most p(p−1)(1+∣x∣2)p/2−1 because p≥2. At x=0 all eigenvalues equal p, which obeys the same bound.

1.2F1F2given

By [F1], Esup⁡t≤T∣Xt∣2<∞, so [F2] makes b(⋅,X⋅) progressive and σ(⋅,X⋅) predictable. The growth bound gives E∫0T(∣b(s,Xs)∣2+∥σ(s,Xs)∥F2)ds≤2K2T(1+Esup⁡s≤T∣Xs∣2)<∞. Thus the drift-square integral and diffusion energy are finite almost surely; pathwise Cauchy–Schwarz gives ∫0T∣b(s,Xs)∣ds≤T(∫0T∣b(s,Xs)∣2ds)1/2<∞. Hence X satisfies the continuous Brownian Itô-process hypotheses in [F2].

1.3F1F2F4given

For R>0 define τR:=inf⁡{s∈[0,T]:∣Xs∣≥R}∧T, with inf⁡∅=+∞. For t<T, {τR≤t}={sup⁡s≤t∣Xs∣≥R}; by continuity and [F4] that supremum is measurable using the countable rational times in [0,t] and t, all of which are Ft-measurable. For t≥T the event is all of Ω, so τR is a stopping time. On [0,τR] the process is bounded by R unless ∣X0∣≥R, in which case τR=0. Hence 1[0,τR]∇V(Xs)Tσ(s,Xs) is predictable and has finite energy on [0,T].

2.1givenstep 1.1algebra

Let LsV(x)=b(s,x)⋅∇V(x)+12tr⁡(σσT(s,x)D2V(x)). The inequality 1+∣x∣≤2(1+∣x∣2) follows by squaring and using (∣x∣−1)2≥0, so the drift term has absolute value at most 2 pKV(x). For each diffusion column σ⋅k, positive semidefiniteness and the operator-norm bound give 0≤σ⋅kTD2V σ⋅k≤∥D2V∥op∣σ⋅k∣2. Summing over the finite m columns yields 0≤12tr⁡(σσTD2V)≤p(p−1)K2V(x). Thus LsV(x)≤CpV(x).

3.1F2F3step 2.1step 1.2step 1.3

Apply the multidimensional Itô formula [F2] to V(X) and evaluate the common continuous identity at t∧τR. By the stopping identity and mean-zero finite-energy martingale facts in [F3], the stopped stochastic integral has expectation zero. With gR(t):=EV(Xt∧τR), nonnegativity of V and step 2.1 therefore give gR(t)=EV(X0)+E∫0t1[0,τR](s)LsV(Xs)ds≤EV(X0)+Cp∫0tgR(s)ds. The right side is finite: before stopping X is bounded, and on paths stopped at zero the value is X0 with finite pth moment.

4.1step 3.1algebra

Set HR(t)=EV(X0)+Cp∫0tgR(s)ds. By step 3.1, gR≤HR; also HR is absolutely continuous and HR′(t)=CpgR(t)≤CpHR(t) almost everywhere. Thus (e−CptHR(t))′≤0 almost everywhere, giving gR(t)≤EV(X0)eCpt.

5.1F5F6step 4.1given∎

Take R=n∈N and let n→∞. Every continuous path on [0,T] is bounded, so for each fixed t one has Xt∧τn→Xt almost surely. Fatou's lemma [F5] and step 4.1 give EV(Xt)≤EV(X0)eCpT. Also V(X0)=(1+∣X0∣2)p/2≤2p/2(1+∣X0∣p) and ∣Xt∣p≤V(Xt). Taking the supremum over 0≤t≤T proves the stated moment bound. AC is only the inherited interface assumption [F6].

Remarks

The proof establishes sup⁡t≤TE∣Xt∣p for each p separately. For p=2, the preceding strong well-posedness theorem gives the stronger path-sup bound. No density, ellipticity, forward Kolmogorov, or reversal claim is used.

Sources

Van Handel, Chapter 5.1, Theorems 5.1.3 and 5.1.5, and van der Vaart, Section 7.1, Theorem 7.8, provide independent stopped second-moment and strong-solution contexts. Neither is used to assert the all-real-p result: the Lyapunov calculation, stopping, martingale expectation, Gronwall bound, and Fatou passage are proved here.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

78 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources