Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pending
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Reverse Gaussian smoothing on a truncated time interval

Statement

Assume AC. Fix d≥1, T>0, a Borel probability measure μ supported in B‾(0,R) for a finite R, and g∈C1([0,T]) with 0<gmin⁡≤g(t)≤gmax⁡<∞. Let W be standard d-dimensional Brownian motion with increments independent of the past, let X0∼μ be independent of future Brownian increments, and set Xt=X0+∫0tg(r)dWr,v(t)=∫0tg(r)2dr,pt(x)=∫ϕv(t)(x−z)μ(dz)(t>0). For 0<ϵ<T, set Yu=XT−u on 0≤u≤T−ϵ. Then there is a standard d-dimensional Brownian motion B in the usual augmentation of the natural reversed filtration such that dYu=g(T−u)2∇log⁡pT−u(Yu) du+g(T−u) dBu,0≤u<T−ϵ. The reverse drift is globally Lipschitz in the state on this truncated interval, with constant at most gmax⁡2(1/v(ϵ)+R2/v(ϵ)2) when supp⁡μ⊆B‾(0,R), and has linear growth. The endpoint coupling satisfies E∣YT−ϵ−X0∣2=dv(ϵ),W2(Law⁡(YT−ϵ),μ)≤dv(ϵ), where W2 is the infimum of root mean-square cost over probability couplings with finite second moments. Consequently YT−ϵ=Xϵ converges to X0 in L2 and its law converges weakly to μ as ϵ↓0. No score or density regularity at t=0 is asserted.

Statement references

Gaussian smoothing density and forward equation: supplies the positive-time density and heat equation for arbitrary compactly supported Borel initial law.

Gaussian mixture score and global Lipschitz bound: supplies the score identity, state-Lipschitz constant, and linear-growth bound on [ϵ,T].

Gaussian smoothing endpoint weak limit: supplies the exact L2, weak, and W2 endpoint coupling estimate without a score claim at zero.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC and the compact-support, Brownian, and noise hypotheses in the Statement.

[A1]

AC is required by the supplied density, score, SDE, local-martingale, and Brownian reconstruction interfaces. The Axiom of Choice

[F1]

On every [ϵ,T], pt is positive and smooth and solves ∂tpt=12g(t)2Δpt; the Gaussian reverse kernels have the Bayes normalization and composition identities. Gaussian smoothing density and forward equation Bayes-reversed Gaussian smoothing kernels

[F2]

The reverse generator on compact tests is L~uφ=g(T−u)2(∇log⁡pT−u⋅∇φ+12Δφ), and the compensated test process is a martingale. Generator and martingale problem for reversed Gaussian smoothing

[F3]

The score is globally Lipschitz and has linear growth uniformly on [ϵ,T], with derivative bound 1/v(ϵ)+R2/v(ϵ)2. Gaussian-mixture score identities and a global Lipschitz bound

[F4]

For a continuous semimartingale, coordinate and coordinate-product martingale tests identify the bracket via the proved product formula; the resulting bracket ∫g(T−u)2Iddu can be inverted to construct Brownian motion. Bounded stopping preserves the continuous martingale identities used in the localization. Quadratic variation of a continuous local martingale An elliptic local martingale has a Brownian driver

[F5]

With X0 compactly supported, Xϵ has finite second moment and the coupling (Xϵ,X0) gives E∣Xϵ−X0∣2=dv(ϵ) and W2(Law⁡(Xϵ),μ)≤dv(ϵ), hence weak convergence. Gaussian smoothing converges weakly at the endpoint

[F6]

Under globally Lipschitz state coefficients and linear growth on a complete usual filtered Brownian space, the SDE has a unique strong solution; solutions driven by the same initial value and Brownian motion are pathwise unique. Itô SDE data and strong solution Global strong well-posedness for Lipschitz Itô SDEs

Proof

Given: the hypotheses in the Statement, AC, and any fixed 0<ϵ<T.

1.1F1F2

By [F1], the reversed Gaussian kernels are normalized and compose, and [F2] gives the reverse martingale problem for Yu=XT−u on 0≤u≤T−ϵ. In particular the reverse generator has drift βu(x)=g(T−u)2∇log⁡pT−u(x) and diffusion matrix au(x)=g(T−u)2Id.

2.1F2F4step 1.1

First pass to the usual augmentation of the reversed filtration and normalize the continuous processes on their common null exceptional set in its initial sigma-algebra. The continuous compact-test martingales in [F2] remain martingales there: on the finite horizon each is a conditional expectation of its integrable terminal value, hence uniformly integrable; passing its event identities along times decreasing to a fixed time gives the right-continuous extension, and completion adds only null-event identities. All stopping and product-formula uses below are on these normalized representatives. Fix R1 and stop when ∣Y∣ reaches R1. Compactly supported cutoffs equal to xi and xixj on that ball turn the identities in [F2] into coordinate and coordinate-product martingales. Subtracting the finite-variation drift gives continuous local martingales Mi. The product formula in [F4] makes YiYj−Yi(0)Yj(0)−∫(βiYj+βjYi)dr−[Mi,Mj] a local martingale. The coordinate-product identity makes the same expression with ∫g(T−r)2δijdr in place of [Mi,Mj] a local martingale. Their difference is a continuous finite-variation local martingale, hence constant by [F4]; it starts at zero. Thus [M]u=∫0ug(T−r)2Iddr. Letting R1↑∞ is valid because Y has continuous paths on the compact time interval.

3.1F4A1step 2.1

The process σr=g(T−r)Id is invertible with bounded inverse. Apply the inverse-diffusion construction in [F4] to define Bu=∫0ug(T−r)−1dMr. Its bracket is uId, so vector Lévy characterization makes B Brownian in the usual augmented reversed filtration in which step 2.1 was carried out. The decomposition of M gives the displayed reverse SDE.

4.1F3F6step 3.1

By [F3], βu is globally Lipschitz in x uniformly on the truncated interval, with constant at most gmax⁡2(1/v(ϵ)+R2/v(ϵ)2); its linear-growth bound follows by multiplying the supplied score bound by gmax⁡2. The diffusion coefficient g(T−u)Id is deterministic and bounded. The initial value Y0=XT has finite second moment since X0 is bounded and the Gaussian increment has finite second moment. Thus [F6] gives a unique strong solution for the same initial value and Brownian motion B on the usual augmented reversed filtration. Pathwise uniqueness identifies this solution with the weak solution Y from step 3.1.

5.1F5step 4.1∎

Since YT−ϵ=Xϵ, the endpoint coupling statement [F5] gives the exact mean-square error and W2 bound. Because v(ϵ)≤gmax⁡2ϵ→0, the coupling proves L2 convergence to X0; the same supplier gives weak convergence of the laws to μ. No part of this step evaluates a score at zero.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

46 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources