Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pendingjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Bayes-reversed Gaussian smoothing kernels

Definition

Assume AC. Fix T>0, a compactly supported Borel probability measure μ on Rd, a continuously differentiable function g:[0,T]→(0,∞) bounded above and away from zero, and v(t)=∫0tg(r)2dr. For t>0 put pt(y)=∫Rdϕv(t)(y−z) μ(dz),q(s,x;t,y)=ϕv(t)−v(s)(y−x)(0≤s<t≤T), where ϕa is the centered Gaussian density with covariance aId. Put p0=μ as a probability measure, not as a Lebesgue density. For 0≤u<v<T define Ku,v(y,dx)=pT−v(x)q(T−v,x;T−u,y)pT−u(y) dx, and for 0≤u<T at the singular data endpoint define Ku,T(y,A)=∫Aq(0,x;T−u,y) μ(dx)pT−u(y)(A Borel). Set Ku,u(y,⋅)=δy. These are the Bayes-reversed kernels of the additive Gaussian smoothing process, including the posterior kernel at the original data time; no density for μ is required.

Definition references

Gaussian-smoothed law and transition density: supplies the explicit positive-time marginal density, Gaussian transition density, and forward marginal and Chapman–Kolmogorov identities.

Anderson, Sections 3–4: context for Bayes reversal from forward transition densities.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, μ, g, v, pt, and q in the definition.

[A1]

The Gaussian smoothing supplier assumes AC, compact support, pt>0 for t>0, the displayed transition density, the forward marginal identity, and Chapman–Kolmogorov; it defines p0=μ without asserting a density there. The Axiom of Choice Gaussian-smoothed data law and transition density

[F1]

A probability kernel assigns a probability measure to each source state and has a measurable evaluation function for each Borel target set. Measure kernel and probability kernel

[F2]

Nonnegative joint Borel densities can be integrated in either order; parameter integrals are measurable. Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product

Verification

1.1F2A1F1

For u<v<T, the integrand 1A(x)pT−v(x)q(T−v,x;T−u,y) is jointly Borel and nonnegative; Tonelli [F2] makes its integral measurable in y, and countable additivity in A follows from countable additivity of the integral. For v=T, the integrand 1A(x)q(0,x;T−u,y) is jointly Borel and nonnegative relative to the finite measure μ, so the same parameter-integral argument applies. All denominators are positive because T−u>0.

2.1A1F1step 1.1

If v<T, the forward marginal identity [A1] gives ∫pT−v(x)q(T−v,x;T−u,y)dx=pT−u(y); if v=T, the same identity with initial measure μ gives ∫q(0,x;T−u,y)μ(dx)=pT−u(y). Thus both formulas have total mass one. The equal-time kernel is a probability measure by definition.

3.1A1F2step 1.1∎

For u<v<w<T, composing the density ratios cancels pT−v(x), and Tonelli followed by forward Chapman–Kolmogorov [A1] gives Ku,vKv,w=Ku,w. If w=T, the same computation leaves μ(dz) times ∫q(0,z;T−v,x)q(T−v,x;T−u,y)dx=q(0,z;T−u,y), so the endpoint formula gives Ku,vKv,T=Ku,T. Cases with equal adjacent times use the identity kernel.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

24 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources