How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
I(V(x^2, xy)) keeps only the radical information
Example
Let be algebraically closed and let . Then , so the zero locus forgets the nilpotent multiplicity in .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An algebraically closed field and the ideal .
An ideal and its radical have the same zero locus (An ideal and its radical have the same zero locus).
Verification
A point lies in exactly when and . Since is a field, this means and is arbitrary. Hence .
The vanishing ideal of the -axis is . Also because and every element of is divisible by . Therefore , in agreement with [L1].
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, A Primer of Commutative Algebra, v4.03, Theorem 13.10 (standard reference, not scraped)