How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Over R, not every maximal ideal is an evaluation ideal
Example
In , the ideal is maximal but is not an evaluation ideal for any .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The polynomial ring .
Evaluation at has kernel (Evaluation at a point has kernel (x_1-a_1, ..., x_n-a_n)).
A maximal ideal of a finite-type algebra has finite residue field over the base field (A maximal ideal of an affine algebra has finite residue field over the base field).
Verification
The quotient is isomorphic to by sending the class of to . Since is a field, is maximal.
For every , [L1] says the evaluation ideal at is , and no such ideal equals because has no real root. So weak Nullstellensatz fails in point form over . The residue field extension here is , which is finite of degree , as [L2] allows.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Allen B. Altman and Steven L. Kleiman, A Term of Commutative Algebra, 13th ed., Corollary (15.5) (standard reference, not scraped)