How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Noether Normalisation and Nullstellensatz - Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Algebraic Extensions, Extension Degree, and Finite Fields
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Chain Conditions, Semisimple Modules and the Wedderburn–Artin Theorem
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Eigenvalues, Eigenvectors and the Characteristic Polynomial
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Finite Fields and Cyclotomic Extensions
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Noether Normalisation and Nullstellensatz
- Noetherian Rings and Hilbert Basis
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Prime Spectra and Radicals
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Field of Fractions and Localisation
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
These examples keep the theory concrete: a small transcendence-basis calculation, explicit infinite-field and finite-field normalisation moves, a denominator obstruction inside , the real-field failure of point-form weak Nullstellensatz, a nonradical ideal whose zero locus sees only its radical, and a fully written Rabinowitsch identity.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
A transcendence basis of k(s, t, sqrt(s+t)) over k
Example
Let , where and are algebraically independent over . Then is a transcendence basis of over .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field , algebraically independent elements over , and .
An algebraically independent set is a transcendence basis once the ambient field is algebraic over the generated field (A maximal algebraically independent set is a transcendence basis).
Verification
The set is algebraically independent over by construction, so is a rational function field in two variables.
The remaining generator satisfies the polynomial , so is algebraic over . Since , the whole field is algebraic over .
Therefore [L1] shows that is a transcendence basis of over .
A triangular change makes a bivariate relation monic
Example
Let be an infinite field of characteristic not equal to , and let
Put . Then the triangular change makes the defining relation monic in , and is module-finite over the polynomial subring .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An infinite field with and the quotient .
Over an infinite field, a triangular change can make a nonzero polynomial monic in one variable (Over an infinite field, a triangular change makes a nonzero polynomial monic).
A monic relation makes the last generator integral over the subalgebra on the earlier generators (A monic relation makes the last generator integral over the earlier ones).
Verification
Introduce the triangular coordinate , so . Then Multiplying by gives the monic polynomial in the variable . This is the concrete instance of [L1].
In the quotient algebra, and the class satisfies over . By [L2], is integral over . Since , the algebra is module-finite over .
Finite-field normalization needs the weight trick
Example
Let and
Then no substitution with makes monic in , but the weight substitution with does.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The finite field and the polynomial .
Rapidly increasing exponent substitutions isolate a unique highest -term (Rapidly increasing power substitutions isolate one highest x_n-term).
Verification
The highest homogeneous part of is itself. For any , so the infinite-field linear-change argument cannot choose a scalar with nonzero leading coefficient.
Now substitute with . Because is a power of the characteristic of , the Frobenius identity gives . Hence Because , the term is the unique highest power of . Therefore the transformed polynomial is already monic in , exactly as [L1] predicts.
A new irreducible denominator stays outside a finitely generated subalgebra of k(t)
Example
In the subalgebra , the element does not belong to .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field , the rational function field , and the subalgebra .
The one-variable denominator obstruction says that finitely many allowed denominator factors cannot generate all of over (The rational function field k(t) is not finite over k[t]).
Verification
Every element of can be written as with and . Thus only powers of occur in the denominator.
If belonged to , then for some . Cross-multiplication would give , so would divide . But substituting gives , impossible. This is the concrete obstruction behind [L1].
Over R, not every maximal ideal is an evaluation ideal
Example
In , the ideal is maximal but is not an evaluation ideal for any .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The polynomial ring .
Evaluation at has kernel (Evaluation at a point has kernel (x_1-a_1, ..., x_n-a_n)).
A maximal ideal of a finite-type algebra has finite residue field over the base field (A maximal ideal of an affine algebra has finite residue field over the base field).
Verification
The quotient is isomorphic to by sending the class of to . Since is a field, is maximal.
For every , [L1] says the evaluation ideal at is , and no such ideal equals because has no real root. So weak Nullstellensatz fails in point form over . The residue field extension here is , which is finite of degree , as [L2] allows.
I(V(x^2, xy)) keeps only the radical information
Example
Let be algebraically closed and let . Then , so the zero locus forgets the nilpotent multiplicity in .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An algebraically closed field and the ideal .
An ideal and its radical have the same zero locus (An ideal and its radical have the same zero locus).
Verification
A point lies in exactly when and . Since is a field, this means and is arbitrary. Hence .
The vanishing ideal of the -axis is . Also because and every element of is divisible by . Therefore , in agreement with [L1].
A small Rabinowitsch identity written out completely
Example
Let and let . Then the auxiliary ideal
contains the explicit identity
and clearing denominators after shows .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field , the ideal , and the polynomial .
If vanishes on , then the auxiliary ideal has empty zero locus (The Rabinowitsch auxiliary ideal has no common zero).
Substituting the inverse of and clearing denominators yields a power of in (Substituting y = 1/f and clearing denominators yields a power of f in I).
Verification
The zero locus of is the single point , and . So the Rabinowitsch hypothesis holds. The displayed formula is already an explicit unit-ideal identity in the auxiliary ideal.
In the localization where is invertible, substitute into to get The zero-denominator case is excluded precisely because this localization inverts . Multiplying by yields . This is the denominator-clearing step of [L3] with .
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Fields and Galois Theory, v5.10, Chapter 9
- Allen B. Altman and Steven L. Kleiman, A Term of Commutative Algebra, 13th ed., §15
- Allen B. Altman and Steven L. Kleiman, A Term of Commutative Algebra, 13th ed., Exercise (15.2)
- J. S. Milne, A Primer of Commutative Algebra, v4.03, Theorem 13.1
- Allen B. Altman and Steven L. Kleiman, A Term of Commutative Algebra, 13th ed., Corollary (15.5)
- J. S. Milne, A Primer of Commutative Algebra, v4.03, Theorem 13.10