Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-06 rests on unproved material (inherited)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

The Grothendieck ring of finite-dimensional vector spaces

Example

The dimension map identifies K0(Vectkfd) with Z as a ring.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k and Vectkfd.

[F1]

This category is fusion (Finite-dimensional vector spaces form a fusion category). Every finite-dimensional vector space is isomorphic to a finite direct sum of copies of k, and k is simple, so k is its only simple class.

[F2]

The Grothendieck group is generated by object classes modulo short-exact relations; its intended multiplication on generators is [V][W]=[VkW] (The Grothendieck ring of a tensor category). We verify that this multiplication is well-defined in the present example.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Dimension is additive on short exact sequences: a basis of a subspace, together with lifts of a basis of the quotient, is a basis of the middle space. Thus d([V])=dimkV respects every relation in [F2] and induces a group homomorphism d:K0Z. Split direct-sum sequences and [F1] give [V]=(dimkV)[k], including [0]=0. Hence e:ZK0, mm[k], satisfies de=id and ed=id, proving the asserted additive bijection on all classes, including negative virtual classes.

F1F2given
2.1

Transport integer multiplication along this bijection: set ab=e(d(a)d(b)). This is a well-defined unital ring structure, with unit e(1)=[k]. Tensor products of finite bases give dimk(VkW)=dimkVdimkW, so [V][W]=e(dimk(VkW))=[VkW]. Thus the intended tensor multiplication in [F2] descends to the quotient; its bilinear extension is unique because object classes generate the group. The map d is therefore an isomorphism of rings, with zero and unit preserved.

step 1.1F2algebra

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources