Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The punctured Euclidean plane is geodesically incomplete

Example

Assume ACω, as required by the library's current maximal-geodesic and geodesic-completeness suppliers. The punctured Euclidean plane M=R2{(0,0)}, with the restricted Euclidean metric, is not geodesically complete. More precisely, the unique maximal geodesic with initial point (1,0) and initial velocity (1,0) is γ:(,1)M,γ(t)=(1t,0), and it has unit speed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The subset M=R2{(0,0)}, the restriction g of the Euclidean metric, and ACω.

[F1]

Open subsets of Euclidean space have the standard smooth structure gives every open subset of R2 its one-chart smooth structure, and Riemannian metric and riemannian manifold characterizes a Riemannian metric as a smooth positive-definite symmetric covariant two-tensor.

[F2]

Christoffel formula for the levi civita connection computes the Levi–Civita symbols from the coordinate metric coefficients.

[F3]

Coordinate geodesic equation says that a curve is geodesic exactly when its coordinates satisfy x¨k+Γkij(x)x˙ix˙j=0.

[F4]

Assuming ACω, Existence uniqueness and smooth dependence of geodesics supplies a unique maximal geodesic on an open interval containing zero for every initial vector.

[F5]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω) names the assumed ACω, and Geodesically complete Riemannian manifold says that a boundaryless Riemannian manifold is geodesically complete exactly when every unique maximal geodesic has domain R.

[F6]

The geodesic spray is a well-defined smooth vector field on TM identifies velocity lifts of geodesics with integral curves of the geodesic spray. Local existence, uniqueness, and smooth dependence for manifold integral curves gives uniqueness for the local integral-curve initial-value problem.

Verification

1.1

For zM, one has z>0, while the distance from z to the origin is exactly z; hence the ball of radius z/2 about z misses the origin, so M is open. By [F1], its identity chart makes it a boundaryless smooth two-manifold. In that chart gij=δij, which is a smooth positive-definite symmetric matrix, so [F1] also makes (M,g) a Riemannian manifold.

F1givenalgebra
2.1

The coefficients gij=δij are constant, so [F2] gives Γkij=0 throughout M. For t<1, the point γ(t)=(1t,0) is nonzero; moreover γ(0)=(1,0), γ(0)=(1,0), γ(t)=0, and γ(t)g=1. Thus [F3] makes γ:(,1)M a unit-speed geodesic with the claimed initial data.

F2F3step 1.1algebra
3.1

Let Γ:IM be the unique maximal geodesic with those initial data from [F4]. By [F6], the velocity lifts of Γ and γ are integral curves of the same smooth spray. On their common interval J=I(,1), let E be the set of times at which the two lifts agree. It contains 0, is closed by continuity, and is open by applying the local uniqueness statement in [F6] at any time of agreement after translating that time to zero. Since J is an interval, E=J. Thus Γ and γ agree on their common interval. Their union is therefore a well-defined geodesic on the interval I(,1), so maximality forces (,1)I. If 1I, continuity of MR2 and the equality for t<1 would give Γ(1)=limt1(1t,0)=(0,0)M, a contradiction. Because I is an interval containing zero, it cannot contain a time greater than 1 without containing 1. Hence I(,1) and therefore I=(,1).

F4F6step 2.1
4.1

The maximal interval in step 3.1 is not R, so [F5] makes (M,g) geodesically incomplete. The witness has a finite excluded upper endpoint, while M itself is nonempty and boundaryless; its starting velocity is nonzero and has norm one. The formula for γ, its geodesic calculation, and the extension obstruction make no choices. The sole use of ACω is through [F4] and [F5], whose current library formulations use it to supply and name unique maximal geodesics.

F5step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1given

Source locator

Andrews, §11.5, Theorem 11.5.1 and its proof, printed pp. 106–108 (PDF pp. 6–8), state the equivalence between metric completeness and indefinite geodesic extension and prove the metric-limit continuation direction. The complete eight-page chapter does not state a punctured-plane example. The explicit manifold, geodesic, maximal interval, and obstruction above are supplied locally and are not attributed to Andrews.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

37 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources