How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The trace of an affine function on a ball is its classical restriction
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let , , , , , and . Then and, by The trace agrees with classical restriction for continuous Sobolev functions, moreover for with by The sharp trace theorem: boundedness and range in the fractional space. At only the statement is made; the space is not renamed . On the sphere the boundary norm is the classical surface integral with the surface measure on the unit sphere.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice; , , , , ; the affine function ; and the trace of The trace operator on a bounded domain.
If a class has a continuous representative on , its trace is the classical restriction of that representative. (The trace agrees with classical restriction for continuous Sobolev functions)
For the trace maps onto with and is bounded: . (The sharp trace theorem: boundedness and range in the fractional space, The fractional Sobolev space on a compact boundary)
The surface integral on the sphere is , and the boundary integral is finite for continuous on the compact boundary. (Surface integration on compact C1 hypersurfaces)
The Euclidean ball has finite Lebesgue measure, and . (A box in with parameters is Lebesgue measurable of measure , whichever of its faces are included)
Verification
The trace is the classical restriction, with a controlled norm. The affine function is smooth on ; its gradient is the constant , so and by [F4]. Hence with , and , so by [F1].
Fractional membership and the boundary norm. For put . By [F2] and step 1.1, with ; at the same computation gives only , and no space is introduced. For the value, parametrise the sphere by ; by [F3] and the definition of the surface integral, , which is the classical sphere integral.
Conclusion. Steps 1.1 and 2.1 prove that the affine class lies in with trace its classical restriction, that the trace lies in the fractional boundary space for with the stated bound, and that its boundary norm is the displayed surface integral.
Source notes
Teschl's Theorem 9.18 (printed p. 209) is the statement for continuous functions; Laugesen's Theorem 3.14 (printed pp. 62-64) records the classical boundary values, and Gagliardo's Teorema [1.I] (printed p. 289) the inverse estimate behind the fractional bound. The example keeps the endpoint out of the fractional notation, as required by the page conventions.
Depends on
- The trace agrees with classical restriction for continuous Sobolev functions
- The $L^p$ trace operator on a bounded $C^1$ domain
- The sharp trace theorem: boundedness and range in the fractional space
- The fractional Sobolev space on a compact $C^1$ boundary
- Surface integration on compact C1 hypersurfaces
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- A box in $\mathbb{R}^n$ with parameters $a_i\le b_i$ is Lebesgue measurable of measure $\prod_{i<n}(b_i-a_i)$, whichever of its faces are included
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
47 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Gerald Teschl, Partial Differential Equations: From Classical to Modern (archived 2025 author manuscript) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Richard S. Laugesen, Linear Analysis and Partial Differential Equations (University of Illinois, complete 158-page graduate notes) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Emilio Gagliardo, Caratterizzazioni delle tracce sulla frontiera relative ad alcune classi di funzioni in $n$ variabili, Rend. Sem. Mat. Univ. Padova 27 (1957), 284-305 (standard reference, not scraped)