Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Two squeeze computations: 1/((k+1)k+1)→0 and (k+(−1)k)/(k+1)→1

Example

(i) The sequence ak:=((k+1)k+1)−1 converges to 0, squeezed between the constant sequence 0 and (k+1)−1. (ii) With (sk) the alternating sequence of FALSE: every bounded sequence converges, the sequence bk:=(k+sk)/(k+1) converges to 1, squeezed between 1−2(k+1)−1 and the constant 1. Both use The squeeze theorem; in (ii) the middle sequence is not presented as a sum of two sequences whose limits are known in advance, which is what the squeeze theorem is for.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: For every natural k the reals k+1 with k+1=σ(k) (Sequences of reals: bounded, eventually, frequently, tails, subsequences), the sequence uk:=(k+1)−1, and the alternating sequence (sk) with s0=1, sσ(k)=−sk (FALSE: every bounded sequence converges); the sequences ak:=((k+1)k+1)−1 and bk:=(k+sk)/(k+1).

[F1]

Squeeze theorem: if ak≤xk≤bk eventually and (ak), (bk) both converge to the same real L, then (xk) converges to L (The squeeze theorem).

[F2]

Sum and scalar clauses of the algebra of limits: if (pk) converges to p and (qk) converges to q, then pk+qk converges to p+q; and c pk converges to c p for every real c (Algebra of limits: sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients).

[F3]

(uk)=((k+1)−1) converges to 0 and every uk is positive (The sequence 1/(k+1) converges to 0).

[F4]

The recursion s0=1, sσ(k)=−sk defines the alternating sequence (sk) (FALSE: every bounded sequence converges).

[F5]
[F6]

Square roots: every real a≥0 has a unique s≥0 with s2=a, written a (Square roots exist: a unique a≥0 with (a)2=a; the positives are {x2:x≠0}).

[F7]

Monotonicity of squaring on nonnegatives: for a,b≥0, a≤b  ⟺  a2≤b2 (Squaring is monotone on the nonnegatives).

[F8]

Inverses of positives: a>0 implies a−1>0; and 0<a<b implies 0<b−1<a−1 (Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order).

[F9]

Multiplying inequalities of nonnegatives: 0≤x≤y and 0≤u≤v imply xu≤yv (Multiplying inequalities of positives).

[F10]

Sign rules: a product of two nonnegatives is nonnegative, and for c>0, x<y implies xc<yc (Sign rules for products and monotonicity of multiplication).

[F11]

Field arithmetic: every nonzero element has an inverse and multiplication distributes over addition (Field).

[F12]

Order arithmetic: the positives are closed under addition and trichotomy holds, so 2:=1+1 is positive and 2≠0 (Ordered field, The multiplicative identity is positive).

[F13]

Convergence: (zk) converges to z when for every rational ε>0 there is K with ∣zk−z∣<ε for all k≥K (Limits and Cauchy sequences of reals).

[F14]

Canonical naturals: k+1≥1 and k+1>0, hence k+1≠0, for every natural k; the map n↦n⋅1R is strictly increasing, hence preserves non-strict order, on {1,2,3,… } (Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing).

[F15]

Absolute value: ∣u∣=u whenever u≥0, so ∣0∣=0 (Absolute value in an ordered field).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1F13F15

For every real c the constant sequence c converges to c: given a rational ε>0, ∣c−c∣=∣0∣=0<ε at every index by [F15], so the threshold K=0 witnesses [F13].

1.2givenF3

The sequence (uk)=((k+1)−1) converges to 0 with every term positive.

1.3givenF4F5

By induction [F5], sk∈{1,−1} for every k: s0=1; and if sk=±1 then sσ(k)=−sk=∓1 by [F4].

1.4givenF6F7F14

For every k one has k+1≥1: by [F6], k+1≥0 and (k+1)2=k+1, while 1≤k+1 by [F14] with 12=1≤k+1, so the equivalence [F7] at the nonnegative pair 1,k+1 gives 1≤k+1.

2.1step 1.4F8F9F10F14

For every k, 0≤ak≤uk: put A:=(k+1)k+1 and B:=k+1, so that A−B=(k+1)(k+1−1)≥0 by [F9] and [F10], because both factors are nonnegative by [F14] and step 1.4; hence 0<B≤A, and reciprocal reversal [F8] gives ak=A−1≤B−1=uk, while ak>0 by [F8].

2.2step 1.3givenF3F10F11F12F14

For every k, the denominator k+1 is nonzero by [F14], and the middle sequence is bounded by the two claimed bounds: if sk=1 then bk=(k+1)/(k+1)=1; if sk=−1 then bk=(k−1)/(k+1)=1−2(k+1)−1=1−2uk. In both cases 1−2uk≤bk≤1: since 2uk>0 by [F3], [F10] and [F12], one has 1−2uk<1. If sk=1 the upper bound is attained and the lower inequality is strict; if sk=−1 the lower bound is attained and the upper inequality is strict.

2.3step 1.1step 1.2F2

The lower bound converges: −2uk→(−2)⋅0=0 by the scalar clause of [F2] applied to step 1.2, and 1−2uk=1+(−2uk)→1+0=1 by the sum clause applied to the constant sequence 1 of step 1.1 and (−2uk).

3.1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1F1

Squeeze for ak: the constant sequence 0 converges to 0 by step 1.1, (uk) converges to 0 by step 1.2, and 0≤ak≤uk at every index by step 2.1; so [F1] gives ak→0.

4.1step 1.1step 2.2step 2.3F1∎

Squeeze for bk: the lower bound converges to 1 by step 2.3, the constant sequence 1 converges to 1 by step 1.1, and 1−2uk≤bk≤1 at every index by step 2.2; so [F1] gives bk→1.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

46 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources